Leveraging technology and standardized institutional practices to mitigate disparities in breast cancer radiation therapy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Causes & Control Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s10552-025-01978-5
Jacob F Oyeniyi, Bailey A Loving, Muayad F Almahariq, Maha Saada Jawad, Joshua T Dilworth
{"title":"Leveraging technology and standardized institutional practices to mitigate disparities in breast cancer radiation therapy.","authors":"Jacob F Oyeniyi, Bailey A Loving, Muayad F Almahariq, Maha Saada Jawad, Joshua T Dilworth","doi":"10.1007/s10552-025-01978-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disparities in various dimensions, including racial, in breast cancer treatment and outcomes are well established. A recent multi-institutional study reported a higher mean heart dose (MHD) in Black and minority women compared to White women who underwent left-sided breast/chest wall irradiation which translated into excess cardiac events and mortality. We evaluated the MHD of women treated in our institution and investigated whether institution-wide measures including the use of readily available but inconsistently adopted technologies can mitigate this disparity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 509 female patients treated with left-sided breast/chest wall irradiation with/without regional nodal irradiation (RNI). Details regarding cardiac dosimetry, deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) such as active breathing coordinator (ABC) use, breast size, internal mammary nodal (IMN) irradiation, and whether the treatment plan met boarding pass requirements and was peer reviewed were noted. MHD differences across racial groups were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, while UVA and MVA linear regression analyses assessed influence of various factors on MHD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MHD(Gy) was similar across racial groups; 1.38, 1.35, and 1.39 (p = 0.6) in Black, White, and other racial groups, respectively. Utilization of hypofractionation, cavity boosts, RNI, IMN irradiation, meeting boarding pass requirements, and peer review were similar. ABC usage (%) was 83/75/62 (p = 0.005), while median breast size(cc) was 1504/1904/1331 (p = 0.001) in White/Black/other women, respectively. On UVA and MVA, MHD differed with IMN treatment, boost and ABC use but not racial groups and varying breast sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite anatomical differences such as breast size, achieving similar cardiac dose is feasible across racial groups by uniformly utilizing appropriate technology such as ABC, with standardized boarding pass constraints, and peer review of all cases. Further studies to identify factors that may cause varied cardiac morbidity rates despite similar cardiac dosimetry among racial groups are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":9432,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Causes & Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Causes & Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-025-01978-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Disparities in various dimensions, including racial, in breast cancer treatment and outcomes are well established. A recent multi-institutional study reported a higher mean heart dose (MHD) in Black and minority women compared to White women who underwent left-sided breast/chest wall irradiation which translated into excess cardiac events and mortality. We evaluated the MHD of women treated in our institution and investigated whether institution-wide measures including the use of readily available but inconsistently adopted technologies can mitigate this disparity.

Methods: We identified 509 female patients treated with left-sided breast/chest wall irradiation with/without regional nodal irradiation (RNI). Details regarding cardiac dosimetry, deep-inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) such as active breathing coordinator (ABC) use, breast size, internal mammary nodal (IMN) irradiation, and whether the treatment plan met boarding pass requirements and was peer reviewed were noted. MHD differences across racial groups were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, while UVA and MVA linear regression analyses assessed influence of various factors on MHD.

Results: MHD(Gy) was similar across racial groups; 1.38, 1.35, and 1.39 (p = 0.6) in Black, White, and other racial groups, respectively. Utilization of hypofractionation, cavity boosts, RNI, IMN irradiation, meeting boarding pass requirements, and peer review were similar. ABC usage (%) was 83/75/62 (p = 0.005), while median breast size(cc) was 1504/1904/1331 (p = 0.001) in White/Black/other women, respectively. On UVA and MVA, MHD differed with IMN treatment, boost and ABC use but not racial groups and varying breast sizes.

Conclusion: Despite anatomical differences such as breast size, achieving similar cardiac dose is feasible across racial groups by uniformly utilizing appropriate technology such as ABC, with standardized boarding pass constraints, and peer review of all cases. Further studies to identify factors that may cause varied cardiac morbidity rates despite similar cardiac dosimetry among racial groups are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Causes & Control
Cancer Causes & Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Causes & Control is an international refereed journal that both reports and stimulates new avenues of investigation into the causes, control, and subsequent prevention of cancer. By drawing together related information published currently in a diverse range of biological and medical journals, it has a multidisciplinary and multinational approach. The scope of the journal includes: variation in cancer distribution within and between populations; factors associated with cancer risk; preventive and therapeutic interventions on a population scale; economic, demographic, and health-policy implications of cancer; and related methodological issues. The emphasis is on speed of publication. The journal will normally publish within 30 to 60 days of acceptance of manuscripts. Cancer Causes & Control publishes Original Articles, Reviews, Commentaries, Opinions, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor which will have direct relevance to researchers and practitioners working in epidemiology, medical statistics, cancer biology, health education, medical economics and related fields. The journal also contains significant information for government agencies concerned with cancer research, control and policy.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging technology and standardized institutional practices to mitigate disparities in breast cancer radiation therapy. Lung cancer screening completion among patients using decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social media use and the relationship with colorectal cancer screening among foreign-born populations in the United States. Comparison of middle aged and older cancer survivors in the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Human papillomavirus and prostate cancer in Mexican men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1