Craftwell: a feasibility and acceptability study of outdoor heritage crafting for wellbeing and mental health.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1556230
Emily Shoesmith, Patricia M Darcy, Stephanie Piper, Piran C L White, Andy Needham, Aimée Little, Gareth Perry, Peter Coventry
{"title":"Craftwell: a feasibility and acceptability study of outdoor heritage crafting for wellbeing and mental health.","authors":"Emily Shoesmith, Patricia M Darcy, Stephanie Piper, Piran C L White, Andy Needham, Aimée Little, Gareth Perry, Peter Coventry","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1556230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There has been increasing interest in creativity, heritage and nature to improve health-related outcomes. However, limited research has examined the intersection of heritage crafting in the context of natural spaces. This study aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of an archaeologically informed outdoor heritage crafting intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods single group before and after feasibility study was conducted. Participants completed questionnaires, including validated items measuring outcomes related to mental health, wellbeing, social connectedness, mindfulness, perceived state of flow and the connection with nature and the environment. Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants to explore their experiences, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight participants from a University in the United Kingdom attended the workshops, achieving the recruitment target within the required timeframe. The response rate to all pre-workshop measures was 100% and remained at 100% post-workshop, with the exception of missing data for two participants (4.2%) for measures assessing wellbeing and anxiety, and missing data for five participants (10.4%) for the measure assessing depression. Therefore, response and retention rates indicate high levels of feasibility to conduct a robust evaluation of this intervention. Five themes were identified, including: participant motivation to sign up; engaging with creative activities in a natural setting; skilled facilitation and a flexible approach; group delivery, and duration and frequency of workshops. Overall, the workshops were positively received by participants, primarily attributing their satisfaction to engagement with group-based creative activities in a natural setting with an educational component.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown it is feasible and acceptable to deliver and evaluate an archaeologically informed heritage crafting intervention to support wellbeing. These results suggest the need for formal testing of the potential health benefits of the intervention to address policy imperatives for developing and implementing community- and place-based approaches to support mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1556230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1556230","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There has been increasing interest in creativity, heritage and nature to improve health-related outcomes. However, limited research has examined the intersection of heritage crafting in the context of natural spaces. This study aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of an archaeologically informed outdoor heritage crafting intervention.

Methods: A mixed-methods single group before and after feasibility study was conducted. Participants completed questionnaires, including validated items measuring outcomes related to mental health, wellbeing, social connectedness, mindfulness, perceived state of flow and the connection with nature and the environment. Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants to explore their experiences, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Forty-eight participants from a University in the United Kingdom attended the workshops, achieving the recruitment target within the required timeframe. The response rate to all pre-workshop measures was 100% and remained at 100% post-workshop, with the exception of missing data for two participants (4.2%) for measures assessing wellbeing and anxiety, and missing data for five participants (10.4%) for the measure assessing depression. Therefore, response and retention rates indicate high levels of feasibility to conduct a robust evaluation of this intervention. Five themes were identified, including: participant motivation to sign up; engaging with creative activities in a natural setting; skilled facilitation and a flexible approach; group delivery, and duration and frequency of workshops. Overall, the workshops were positively received by participants, primarily attributing their satisfaction to engagement with group-based creative activities in a natural setting with an educational component.

Conclusion: This study has shown it is feasible and acceptable to deliver and evaluate an archaeologically informed heritage crafting intervention to support wellbeing. These results suggest the need for formal testing of the potential health benefits of the intervention to address policy imperatives for developing and implementing community- and place-based approaches to support mental health.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Craftwell:户外遗产制作对身心健康的可行性和可接受性研究。
背景:人们越来越关注创造力、遗产和自然,以改善与健康相关的结果。然而,有限的研究已经检查了自然空间背景下遗产制作的交集。本研究旨在探讨考古信息户外遗产制作干预的可行性和可接受性。方法:采用混合方法单组,前后进行可行性研究。参与者完成了问卷调查,包括与心理健康、幸福感、社会联系、正念、心流感知状态以及与自然和环境的联系相关的有效项目。对参与者进行了定性访谈,以探索他们的经历,并使用主题分析对数据进行了分析。结果:来自英国一所大学的48名学员参加了研讨会,在规定的时间内完成了招聘目标。所有研讨会前测量的回复率均为100%,并在研讨会后保持100%,但评估健康和焦虑的测量中有2名参与者(4.2%)缺少数据,评估抑郁的测量中有5名参与者(10.4%)缺少数据。因此,应答率和保留率表明,对该干预措施进行强有力的评估具有很高的可行性。确定了五个主题,包括:参与者注册的动机;在自然环境中从事创造性活动;熟练的指导和灵活的方法;小组交付,以及讲习班的持续时间和频率。总的来说,讲习班受到了参与者的积极欢迎,主要是由于他们在具有教育成分的自然环境中参与了以团体为基础的创造性活动。结论:这项研究表明,提供和评估考古学信息的遗产制作干预措施以支持福祉是可行和可接受的。这些结果表明,有必要对干预措施的潜在健康效益进行正式测试,以解决制定和实施基于社区和地方的方法来支持精神卫生的政策要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
An individual with multiple high-risk links uncovered: an epidemiological investigation based on molecular network analysis. Associations of electronic health literacy with related factors in individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional analysis. Animal contact-related nontyphoidal Salmonella enterica outbreaks in humans in the U.S. (2009-2022): serovar-specific temporal trends and associations with exposure sources and settings. A commentary on GST reforms and their effect on cancer care in India. Predicting patient dropout: a nomogram for loss to follow-up after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1