Development of a standardized single-session cardiopulmonary exercise test for combined assessment of peak oxygen uptake and on/off-kinetics.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Experimental Physiology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1113/EP092337
Jefferson L Santana, Till Enzner, Britney Blunderfield, Asher A Mendelson, Rodrigo Villar
{"title":"Development of a standardized single-session cardiopulmonary exercise test for combined assessment of peak oxygen uptake and on/off-kinetics.","authors":"Jefferson L Santana, Till Enzner, Britney Blunderfield, Asher A Mendelson, Rodrigo Villar","doi":"10.1113/EP092337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peak oxygen uptake ( <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>peak</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) and <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> on/off-kinetics are key indicators of exercise capacity and health outcomes, but their assessment often requires separate laboratory visits, which limits feasibility. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a single cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for both assessments. We designed a single-session combined CPET protocol using an upright cycle ergometer in healthy volunteers (n = 20). <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>peak</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> was first estimated using an a priori formula. The constant work rate (CWR) part of the test (on-kinetics) was set to an intensity of 30% <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>reserve</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{reserve}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . After an incremental test to measure <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>peak</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> , a 10-min recovery period was used to evaluate off-kinetics. Twenty volunteers (9 females and 11 males), 28.0 ± 8.1 years completed the protocol. No significant differences were found between predicted and measured <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>peak</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> (P = 0.47). A strong correlation (r = 0.88) and good agreement (Bland-Altman bias = -0.82 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) were found between the calculated/actual individuals' 30% <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>reserve</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{reserve}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> (mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) and the measured steady-state <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> at CWR. The measured exercise intensity at CWR closely matched the target of 30%, with no statistical differences, with an average difference of 0.2 percentage points. Small-medium Cohen's d (0.16) indicated high similarity between predicted and measured <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>peak</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> on- and off-kinetics analyses were also performed for all participants with mono-exponential fittings. A single-session protocol for the combined assessment of <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <mrow><msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> <mi>peak</mi></mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\\mathrm{peak}}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> and <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> on/off-kinetics was developed. This protocol will enable greater recruitment and participation in research and enhanced detail for clinical CPET use. Future research should evaluate intra- and inter-participant reproducibility over repeated sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peak oxygen uptake ( V ̇ O 2 peak ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$ ) and V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ on/off-kinetics are key indicators of exercise capacity and health outcomes, but their assessment often requires separate laboratory visits, which limits feasibility. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a single cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) for both assessments. We designed a single-session combined CPET protocol using an upright cycle ergometer in healthy volunteers (n = 20). V ̇ O 2 peak ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$ was first estimated using an a priori formula. The constant work rate (CWR) part of the test (on-kinetics) was set to an intensity of 30% V ̇ O 2 reserve ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{reserve}}}}$ . After an incremental test to measure V ̇ O 2 peak ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$ , a 10-min recovery period was used to evaluate off-kinetics. Twenty volunteers (9 females and 11 males), 28.0 ± 8.1 years completed the protocol. No significant differences were found between predicted and measured V ̇ O 2 peak ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$ (P = 0.47). A strong correlation (r = 0.88) and good agreement (Bland-Altman bias = -0.82 mL kg-1 min-1) were found between the calculated/actual individuals' 30% V ̇ O 2 reserve ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{reserve}}}}$ (mL kg-1 min-1) and the measured steady-state V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ at CWR. The measured exercise intensity at CWR closely matched the target of 30%, with no statistical differences, with an average difference of 0.2 percentage points. Small-medium Cohen's d (0.16) indicated high similarity between predicted and measured V ̇ O 2 peak ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$ . V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ on- and off-kinetics analyses were also performed for all participants with mono-exponential fittings. A single-session protocol for the combined assessment of V ̇ O 2 peak ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}{\mathrm{peak}}}}$ and V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ on/off-kinetics was developed. This protocol will enable greater recruitment and participation in research and enhanced detail for clinical CPET use. Future research should evaluate intra- and inter-participant reproducibility over repeated sessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Development of a standardized single-session cardiopulmonary exercise test for combined assessment of peak oxygen uptake and on/off-kinetics. Limited matching of the cardiac output response to the peripheral demand of heat stress and exercise. RETRACTION: Comparison of Preventive and Therapeutic Effects of Continuous Exercise on Acute Lung Injury Induced with Methotrexate. Increase in plasma succinate is associated with aerobic lactate production in a model of endotoxic shock. Microgravity-induced changes in skeletal muscle and possible countermeasures: What we can learn from bed rest and human space studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1