{"title":"A cross-sequential study of academic readiness and coping strategies among first-generation college students.","authors":"Nimra Rani Musawar, Najia Zulfiqar","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1537850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transition from high school to college has embedded challenges, particularly for first-generation students. The study examined the overtime relationship and level of academic readiness and coping strategies among first-year, first-generation, and continuing-generation college students. Another objective was to examine the gender differences in the study variable. A cross-sequential design was used to collect data during college entry and 3 months after the baseline assessment. The differences in the levels of readiness and coping were examined based on participants' generation status and gender. Generation status played a significant role in shaping readiness and coping strategies, and this association was more vital for the continuing generation than for the first-generation college students. As hypothesized, the findings show that first-generation college students were less ready and used poor coping strategies than continuing-generation college students at Time 1. However, this difference disappeared 3 months later between the two cohorts. The overall scores of readiness and coping increased from Time 1 to Time 2. Gender comparison showed that irrespective of being FGCS or CGCS, girls were more prepared than boys at the time of entering college, and boys surpassed girls in using coping strategies to overcome academic issues. Limitations, implications, and recommendations are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1537850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1537850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transition from high school to college has embedded challenges, particularly for first-generation students. The study examined the overtime relationship and level of academic readiness and coping strategies among first-year, first-generation, and continuing-generation college students. Another objective was to examine the gender differences in the study variable. A cross-sequential design was used to collect data during college entry and 3 months after the baseline assessment. The differences in the levels of readiness and coping were examined based on participants' generation status and gender. Generation status played a significant role in shaping readiness and coping strategies, and this association was more vital for the continuing generation than for the first-generation college students. As hypothesized, the findings show that first-generation college students were less ready and used poor coping strategies than continuing-generation college students at Time 1. However, this difference disappeared 3 months later between the two cohorts. The overall scores of readiness and coping increased from Time 1 to Time 2. Gender comparison showed that irrespective of being FGCS or CGCS, girls were more prepared than boys at the time of entering college, and boys surpassed girls in using coping strategies to overcome academic issues. Limitations, implications, and recommendations are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.