Multicenter phase II study on the efficacy of an oral nutritional supplement containing eicosapentaenoic acid in advanced gastric cancer patients with cachexia.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastric Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s10120-025-01605-x
Ryohei Kawabata, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Tomono Kawase, Junji Kawada, Yutaka Kimura, Yasushige Kashima, Shugo Ueda, Atsushi Takeno, Kazuhiro Shimomura, Hiroshi Imamura
{"title":"Multicenter phase II study on the efficacy of an oral nutritional supplement containing eicosapentaenoic acid in advanced gastric cancer patients with cachexia.","authors":"Ryohei Kawabata, Kazuhiro Nishikawa, Tomono Kawase, Junji Kawada, Yutaka Kimura, Yasushige Kashima, Shugo Ueda, Atsushi Takeno, Kazuhiro Shimomura, Hiroshi Imamura","doi":"10.1007/s10120-025-01605-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cachexia is a common complication in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) may ameliorate cachexia. This single-arm, phase II study assessed the potential benefit of an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ONS-EPA) for cachexia in AGC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chemotherapy-naive AGC patients with cachexia, defined by serum albumin < 3.5 g/dl and C-reactive protein ≥ 0.5 mg/dl, were included. Patients received an EPA-enriched supplement (Prosure<sup>®</sup>, 1.056 g EPA/pack) twice daily during first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) in patients adhering to ≥ 25% of the planned ONS-EPA dose in the first two weeks (per-protocol set, PPS). Secondary analyses evaluated adherence impact on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 72 enrolled patients, 65 were evaluated. Median adherence was 42.8%. Median TTF in the PPS group was 4.8 months (95% CI 3.6-5.5), below the pre-set 4-month threshold. The PPS group had a higher proportion of patients who improved their nutritional and inflammatory status during treatment, along with better TTF and overall survival (OS) compared to those with poor adherence. Adjusted median TTF was 4.6 vs. 2.5 months (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% CI 0.28-1.12, p = 0.105).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the primary endpoint was not achieved, the study suggests that ONS-EPA may benefit AGC patients with cachexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12684,"journal":{"name":"Gastric Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01605-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cachexia is a common complication in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) may ameliorate cachexia. This single-arm, phase II study assessed the potential benefit of an oral nutritional supplement containing EPA (ONS-EPA) for cachexia in AGC patients.

Methods: Chemotherapy-naive AGC patients with cachexia, defined by serum albumin < 3.5 g/dl and C-reactive protein ≥ 0.5 mg/dl, were included. Patients received an EPA-enriched supplement (Prosure®, 1.056 g EPA/pack) twice daily during first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) in patients adhering to ≥ 25% of the planned ONS-EPA dose in the first two weeks (per-protocol set, PPS). Secondary analyses evaluated adherence impact on treatment outcomes.

Results: Of 72 enrolled patients, 65 were evaluated. Median adherence was 42.8%. Median TTF in the PPS group was 4.8 months (95% CI 3.6-5.5), below the pre-set 4-month threshold. The PPS group had a higher proportion of patients who improved their nutritional and inflammatory status during treatment, along with better TTF and overall survival (OS) compared to those with poor adherence. Adjusted median TTF was 4.6 vs. 2.5 months (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% CI 0.28-1.12, p = 0.105).

Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint was not achieved, the study suggests that ONS-EPA may benefit AGC patients with cachexia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastric Cancer
Gastric Cancer 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastric Cancer is an esteemed global forum that focuses on various aspects of gastric cancer research, treatment, and biology worldwide. The journal promotes a diverse range of content, including original articles, case reports, short communications, and technical notes. It also welcomes Letters to the Editor discussing published articles or sharing viewpoints on gastric cancer topics. Review articles are predominantly sought after by the Editor, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the field. With a dedicated and knowledgeable editorial team, the journal is committed to providing exceptional support and ensuring high levels of author satisfaction. In fact, over 90% of published authors have expressed their intent to publish again in our esteemed journal.
期刊最新文献
Multicenter phase II study on the efficacy of an oral nutritional supplement containing eicosapentaenoic acid in advanced gastric cancer patients with cachexia. Appetite-preserving gastrectomy (APG) for esophagogastric junction cancer: preserving the residual stomach as an endocrine organ. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer: A Review. Nishi memorial award in gastric cancer. Predicting chemotherapy responsiveness in gastric cancer through machine learning analysis of genome, immune, and neutrophil signatures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1