Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is a risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty with a conventional polyethylene liner: a 25-year follow-up study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS HIP International Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1177/11207000251326473
Hideki Ueyama, Mitsuyoshi Yamamura, Junichiro Koyanagi, Kenji Fukunaga, Susumu Takemura, Suguru Nakamura, Hiroshi Kagiyama
{"title":"Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is a risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty with a conventional polyethylene liner: a 25-year follow-up study.","authors":"Hideki Ueyama, Mitsuyoshi Yamamura, Junichiro Koyanagi, Kenji Fukunaga, Susumu Takemura, Suguru Nakamura, Hiroshi Kagiyama","doi":"10.1177/11207000251326473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is an independent risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional polyethylene (PE) liner is unclear. This long-term follow-up study assessed the association between posterior pelvic tilt and cup revision after THA using the porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 94 patients who underwent THA using the PCA total hip system and participated in postoperative follow-up for a mean of 25 years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score was the clinical outcome, and prosthetic alignment and the change in pelvic tilt were measured as radiological outcomes. Prosthetic survival rates for revision as the endpoint were evaluated, and risk factors for cup revision were identified using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The JOA hip score improved significantly (<i>p <</i> 0.001) after THA (before THA: 41 ± 6.3 points; after THA: 86 ± 8.9 points). The postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progressed 3.6 ± 3.2°. Survival rates of the cup and stem at 27 years postoperatively were 60.8% and 87.5%, respectively (<i>p <</i> 0.001). The main reason for revision (81% of all revisions) was aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.20; <i>p =</i> 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When the PCA total hip system was used, the stem exhibited good longevity during a mean follow-up period of 25 years; however, the cup was vulnerable because of aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"486-492"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251326473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression is an independent risk factor for cup revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a conventional polyethylene (PE) liner is unclear. This long-term follow-up study assessed the association between posterior pelvic tilt and cup revision after THA using the porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip system.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 94 patients who underwent THA using the PCA total hip system and participated in postoperative follow-up for a mean of 25 years. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score was the clinical outcome, and prosthetic alignment and the change in pelvic tilt were measured as radiological outcomes. Prosthetic survival rates for revision as the endpoint were evaluated, and risk factors for cup revision were identified using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: The JOA hip score improved significantly (p < 0.001) after THA (before THA: 41 ± 6.3 points; after THA: 86 ± 8.9 points). The postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progressed 3.6 ± 3.2°. Survival rates of the cup and stem at 27 years postoperatively were 60.8% and 87.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). The main reason for revision (81% of all revisions) was aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.20; p = 0.022).

Conclusions: When the PCA total hip system was used, the stem exhibited good longevity during a mean follow-up period of 25 years; however, the cup was vulnerable because of aseptic loosening. Postoperative posterior pelvic tilt progression was an independent risk factor for cup revision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后后骨盆倾斜进展是常规聚乙烯衬垫全髋关节置换术后杯翻修的危险因素:一项25年随访研究。
背景:术后后骨盆倾斜进展是否是常规聚乙烯(PE)衬垫全髋关节置换术(THA)后杯翻修的独立危险因素尚不清楚。这项长期随访研究评估了使用多孔包被解剖(PCA)全髋关节系统THA后骨盆后倾与髋杯翻修之间的关系。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入94例采用PCA全髋关节系统行THA的患者,术后随访平均25年。日本骨科协会(JOA)髋关节评分是临床结果,假体对齐和骨盆倾斜的变化是放射学结果。以假体翻修为终点评估假体存活率,并使用多变量logistic回归分析确定假体翻修的危险因素。结果:THA后JOA髋关节评分显著提高(p 0.001) (THA前:41±6.3分;术后:86±8.9分)。术后骨盆后侧倾斜3.6±3.2°。术后27年,杯状体和茎状体的生存率分别为60.8%和87.5% (p < 0.001)。修订的主要原因(占所有修订的81%)是无菌性松动。术后骨盆后倾进展是罩杯翻修的独立危险因素(优势比,1.53;95%置信区间为1.06-2.20;p = 0.022)。结论:当使用PCA全髋关节系统时,该系统在平均25年的随访期间表现出良好的寿命;然而,由于无菌性松动,杯子是脆弱的。术后骨盆后倾进展是杯型翻修的独立危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
期刊最新文献
Impact of CT-based 3D modelling on hip joint anatomical measurements: a comparative study with 2D methods. Surgical management of a subtrochanteric fracture in a patient with 50-year longstanding intra-articular hip ankylosis and ischiofemoral synostosis: a case report. Haemoglobin threshold-based blood transfusion practices in patients following hip fracture surgery: a multicentre retrospective study. The risk of prosthetic joint infection with oxidised zirconium-on-polyethylene components in total hip arthroplasty: a comparison to conventional bearings. Using a robotic-arm assisted system in revision total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique and a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1