Hearing Loss and Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0056
Brian Sheng Yep Yeo, Vanessa Yee Jueen Tan, Jia Hui Ng, Joyce Zhi'en Tang, Brenda Ling Hui Sim, Yu Ling Tay, Anupama Roy Chowdhury, Abel P David, Nicole T Jiam, Elliott D Kozin, Steven D Rauch
{"title":"Hearing Loss and Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Brian Sheng Yep Yeo, Vanessa Yee Jueen Tan, Jia Hui Ng, Joyce Zhi'en Tang, Brenda Ling Hui Sim, Yu Ling Tay, Anupama Roy Chowdhury, Abel P David, Nicole T Jiam, Elliott D Kozin, Steven D Rauch","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Falls constitute a significant public health concern worldwide and have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality across all ages. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors for falls is a key public health priority. Literature surrounding the association between hearing loss (HL) and falls remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively synthesize evidence surrounding the impact of HL on falls.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception through April 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Observational studies investigating the association between HL and falls were selected. Only studies reporting covariate-adjusted estimates were included to minimize confounding.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Using a random-effects model, adjusted estimates were pooled in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was evaluated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was assessed.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The cross-sectional odds and longitudinal risk of falls among patients with HL compared with those without HL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 071 935 participants were included from 27 studies; approximately 49.2% of participants were female, and 14 studies were conducted in Asia, 7 in North America, 3 in Europe, and 3 in Oceania, represented by Australia. Patients with HL exhibited an increased cross-sectional odds of falls (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.37-1.67; I2 = 64%) and longitudinal risk of falls (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29; I2 = 69%) than those without HL. Further stratification by self-reported or validated hearing assessments, fall reporting duration, continent, community-dwelling adults, and studies adjusting for other sensory deficits identified as fall risk factors by the World Falls Guideline did not change significance. These results remained robust to sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was absent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis found that overall, HL may be a risk factor for falls. With a rapidly aging global population, it is crucial to acknowledge the public health concerns surrounding falls and consider if HL could be a potentially modifiable risk factor. Nonetheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate any benefit of treating HL on fall prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":"485-494"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.0056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Falls constitute a significant public health concern worldwide and have been associated with increased morbidity and mortality across all ages. Identifying potentially modifiable risk factors for falls is a key public health priority. Literature surrounding the association between hearing loss (HL) and falls remains inconclusive.

Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively synthesize evidence surrounding the impact of HL on falls.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception through April 9, 2024.

Study selection: Observational studies investigating the association between HL and falls were selected. Only studies reporting covariate-adjusted estimates were included to minimize confounding.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers evaluated studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Using a random-effects model, adjusted estimates were pooled in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was evaluated using subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was assessed.

Main outcomes and measures: The cross-sectional odds and longitudinal risk of falls among patients with HL compared with those without HL.

Results: A total of 5 071 935 participants were included from 27 studies; approximately 49.2% of participants were female, and 14 studies were conducted in Asia, 7 in North America, 3 in Europe, and 3 in Oceania, represented by Australia. Patients with HL exhibited an increased cross-sectional odds of falls (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.37-1.67; I2 = 64%) and longitudinal risk of falls (risk ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29; I2 = 69%) than those without HL. Further stratification by self-reported or validated hearing assessments, fall reporting duration, continent, community-dwelling adults, and studies adjusting for other sensory deficits identified as fall risk factors by the World Falls Guideline did not change significance. These results remained robust to sensitivity analyses, and publication bias was absent.

Conclusions and relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that overall, HL may be a risk factor for falls. With a rapidly aging global population, it is crucial to acknowledge the public health concerns surrounding falls and consider if HL could be a potentially modifiable risk factor. Nonetheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to elucidate any benefit of treating HL on fall prevention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力损失和跌倒:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
重要性:跌倒是世界范围内一个重大的公共卫生问题,与各年龄段发病率和死亡率的增加有关。确定可能改变的跌倒风险因素是一项关键的公共卫生优先事项。有关听力损失(HL)和跌倒之间关系的文献尚无定论。目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,综合分析HL对跌倒影响的相关证据。数据来源:PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆,从数据库建立到2024年4月9日。研究选择:选择调查HL和跌倒之间关系的观察性研究。仅纳入报告协变量调整估计的研究,以尽量减少混淆。数据提取和综合:两名独立的审稿人评估研究的合格性,提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型,将调整后的估计值汇总到meta分析中。采用亚组分析和敏感性分析评估异质性,并评估发表偏倚。主要结局和指标:与非HL患者相比,HL患者摔倒的横截面几率和纵向风险。结果:27项研究共纳入5 071 935名受试者;大约49.2%的参与者是女性,14项研究在亚洲进行,7项在北美进行,3项在欧洲进行,3项在大洋洲进行,以澳大利亚为代表。HL患者摔倒的横断面几率增加(优势比,1.51;95% ci, 1.37-1.67;I2 = 64%)和纵向跌倒风险(风险比1.17;95% ci, 1.06-1.29;I2 = 69%)。通过自我报告或验证的听力评估、跌倒报告持续时间、大陆、社区居住的成年人以及调整世界跌倒指南确定的跌倒危险因素的其他感觉缺陷的研究,进一步分层没有改变意义。这些结果在敏感性分析中仍然是稳健的,并且没有发表偏倚。结论和相关性:本系统综述和荟萃分析发现,总体而言,HL可能是跌倒的危险因素。随着全球人口的迅速老龄化,认识到与跌倒有关的公共卫生问题并考虑HL是否可能是一个潜在的可改变的风险因素是至关重要的。尽管如此,需要进一步的随机临床试验来阐明治疗HL对预防跌倒的任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Risk of Osteoradionecrosis For Intensity-Modulated Photon vs Proton Therapy in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma-Reply. JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Peer Reviewers in 2025. Analyzing the Risk of Osteoradionecrosis For Intensity-Modulated Photon vs Proton Therapy in Oropharyngeal Carcinoma. Tumor and Flap Reconstruction Volumes and Functional Outcomes after Glossectomy. Long-Term Outcomes of an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy Intervention for Tinnitus: Follow-Up Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1