Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial doppler biomarkers for the prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1177/0271678X251313746
Hanna Schenck, Céline van Craenenbroeck, Sander van Kuijk, Erik Gommer, Michael Veldeman, Yasin Temel, Marcel Aries, Werner Mess, Roel Haeren
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial doppler biomarkers for the prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Hanna Schenck, Céline van Craenenbroeck, Sander van Kuijk, Erik Gommer, Michael Veldeman, Yasin Temel, Marcel Aries, Werner Mess, Roel Haeren","doi":"10.1177/0271678X251313746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) significantly impacts mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of Transcranial Doppler (TCD)-derived biomarkers for predicting DCI via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Included studies had to correctly define DCI and report data on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Univariate or bivariate analyses with a random effects model were used, and risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. From 23 eligible articles (n = 2371 patients), three biomarker categories were identified: cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV), cerebral autoregulation, and microembolic signals (MES). The highest sensitivity (0.86, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) and specificity (0.75, 95% CI 0.52-0.94) for DCI prediction were achieved with a mean CBFV of 120 cm/s combined with a Lindegaard ratio. The transient hyperemic response test showed the best performance among autoregulatory biomarkers with a sensitivity of 0.88, (95% CI 0.54-0.98) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.52-0.94). MES were less effective predictors. Combining CBFV with autoregulatory biomarkers enhanced TCD's predictive value. High heterogeneity and risk of bias were noted, indicating the need for a standardized TCD approach for improved DCI evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"271678X251313746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X251313746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) significantly impacts mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of Transcranial Doppler (TCD)-derived biomarkers for predicting DCI via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Included studies had to correctly define DCI and report data on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Univariate or bivariate analyses with a random effects model were used, and risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. From 23 eligible articles (n = 2371 patients), three biomarker categories were identified: cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV), cerebral autoregulation, and microembolic signals (MES). The highest sensitivity (0.86, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) and specificity (0.75, 95% CI 0.52-0.94) for DCI prediction were achieved with a mean CBFV of 120 cm/s combined with a Lindegaard ratio. The transient hyperemic response test showed the best performance among autoregulatory biomarkers with a sensitivity of 0.88, (95% CI 0.54-0.98) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.52-0.94). MES were less effective predictors. Combining CBFV with autoregulatory biomarkers enhanced TCD's predictive value. High heterogeneity and risk of bias were noted, indicating the need for a standardized TCD approach for improved DCI evaluation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
期刊最新文献
More severe vascular remodeling in deep brain regions caused by hemodynamic differences is a potential mechanism of hypertensive cerebral small vessel disease. Behavioural assessment of neuropsychiatric outcomes in rodent stroke models. Selective deletion of interleukin-1 alpha in microglia does not modify acute outcome but may regulate neurorepair processes after experimental ischemic stroke. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial doppler biomarkers for the prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Characterising the protective vasodilatory effects of hypobaric hypoxia on the neurovascular coupling response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1