Transfusion of Whole Blood Is Not Associated With Increased Rate of Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf080
Samantha Murphy, Aaron Russell, Daniel Meaders, David Limon, Lauran Barry, Vipulkumar Prajapati, Leslie Greebon, Erika Brigmon, Donald Jenkins
{"title":"Transfusion of Whole Blood Is Not Associated With Increased Rate of Hemolytic Transfusion Reaction.","authors":"Samantha Murphy, Aaron Russell, Daniel Meaders, David Limon, Lauran Barry, Vipulkumar Prajapati, Leslie Greebon, Erika Brigmon, Donald Jenkins","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low-titer cold-stored whole blood (WB) transfusion provides multiple advantages over component therapy (CT) in resuscitation of the hemorrhaging patient. However, concern regarding the risk of hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) is a barrier for continued expansion of the use of WB. HTR is most often seen after transfusion of packed red blood cells (RBCs), and the rate of HTR after WB transfusion remains largely unknown. We sought to investigate the incidence of HTR after WB transfusion at our institution via a retrospective observational study. Given that the pathogenesis of HTR is often an immune-mediated response to RBC antigens, we hypothesized that the incidence of HTR in WB transfusion would not be higher than in CT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The institutional blood bank was queried for the total number of units transfused in the facility and all suspected transfusion reactions from CT (RBC, fresh-frozen plasma [FFP], or platelets) or WB between July 2020 and June 2023. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the type and severity of reaction and the implicated product. The primary outcome was incidence of HTR. Secondary outcomes were incidence of severe transfusion reaction (including transfusion-associated cardiac overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, and severe allergic reactions) and in-hospital mortality related to transfusion reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two HTRs occurred out of 6,771 units of WB transfused (incidence 0.03%), compared to 6 HTRs out of 49,802 units of RBCs (incidence 0.012%, P = .25 via Fisher's exact test). One severe reaction occurred in the WB subgroup (0.01%); 8 occurred with RBC (0.02%). In patients with suspected transfusion reaction, there was no difference in mortality between WB (1, 0.01%) and RBC transfusion (7, 0.01%). No HTR was seen in patients who received prehospital transfusion of WB, RBC, or platelets (no patient received prehospital FFP). No HTR was seen with transfusion of platelets or FFP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective study found no difference in incidence of HTR, severe transfusion reaction, or mortality with transfusion of WB when compared to CT, in particular RBC. These findings underpin the assertion that WB is a safe method of resuscitation and supports the expanded utilization of WB in both in-hospital and prehospital settings, and has implications in both civilian and deployed settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1946-e1950"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low-titer cold-stored whole blood (WB) transfusion provides multiple advantages over component therapy (CT) in resuscitation of the hemorrhaging patient. However, concern regarding the risk of hemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR) is a barrier for continued expansion of the use of WB. HTR is most often seen after transfusion of packed red blood cells (RBCs), and the rate of HTR after WB transfusion remains largely unknown. We sought to investigate the incidence of HTR after WB transfusion at our institution via a retrospective observational study. Given that the pathogenesis of HTR is often an immune-mediated response to RBC antigens, we hypothesized that the incidence of HTR in WB transfusion would not be higher than in CT.

Materials and methods: The institutional blood bank was queried for the total number of units transfused in the facility and all suspected transfusion reactions from CT (RBC, fresh-frozen plasma [FFP], or platelets) or WB between July 2020 and June 2023. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the type and severity of reaction and the implicated product. The primary outcome was incidence of HTR. Secondary outcomes were incidence of severe transfusion reaction (including transfusion-associated cardiac overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, and severe allergic reactions) and in-hospital mortality related to transfusion reaction.

Results: Two HTRs occurred out of 6,771 units of WB transfused (incidence 0.03%), compared to 6 HTRs out of 49,802 units of RBCs (incidence 0.012%, P = .25 via Fisher's exact test). One severe reaction occurred in the WB subgroup (0.01%); 8 occurred with RBC (0.02%). In patients with suspected transfusion reaction, there was no difference in mortality between WB (1, 0.01%) and RBC transfusion (7, 0.01%). No HTR was seen in patients who received prehospital transfusion of WB, RBC, or platelets (no patient received prehospital FFP). No HTR was seen with transfusion of platelets or FFP.

Conclusions: This retrospective study found no difference in incidence of HTR, severe transfusion reaction, or mortality with transfusion of WB when compared to CT, in particular RBC. These findings underpin the assertion that WB is a safe method of resuscitation and supports the expanded utilization of WB in both in-hospital and prehospital settings, and has implications in both civilian and deployed settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全血输注与溶血性输血反应发生率增高无关。
低滴度冷藏全血(WB)输血在出血患者的复苏中提供了比成分治疗(CT)更多的优势。然而,对溶血性输血反应(HTR)风险的担忧是WB继续扩大使用的一个障碍。HTR最常见于填充红细胞(rbc)输注后,输血后HTR的发生率在很大程度上仍然未知。我们试图通过一项回顾性观察研究来调查我们机构输血后HTR的发生率。考虑到HTR的发病机制通常是对红细胞抗原的免疫介导反应,我们假设输血时HTR的发生率不会高于CT。材料和方法:查询机构血库在2020年7月至2023年6月期间在该设施输血的总单位数和所有可疑输血反应的CT (RBC、新鲜冷冻血浆[FFP]或血小板)或WB。回顾性图表审查进行,以确定类型和严重程度的反应和牵连的产物。主要观察指标为HTR的发生率。次要结局是严重输血反应的发生率(包括输血相关的心脏负荷、输血相关的急性肺损伤和严重过敏反应)和与输血反应相关的住院死亡率。结果:6771单位WB输注中发生2例htr(发生率0.03%),49,802单位红细胞输注中发生6例htr(发生率0.012%,P =。25(根据费雪的精确检验)。WB亚组发生1例严重反应(0.01%);8例发生在RBC(0.02%)。在怀疑有输血反应的患者中,输血WB(1,0.01%)和输血RBC(7,0.01%)的死亡率没有差异。院前输注WB、RBC或血小板的患者未见HTR(院前无患者接受FFP)。输注血小板或FFP均未见HTR。结论:本回顾性研究发现,与CT相比,输血WB的HTR发生率、严重输血反应或死亡率没有差异,特别是RBC。这些发现支持了WB是一种安全的复苏方法的主张,并支持WB在院内和院前环境中的扩大应用,并且对民用和部署环境都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Wilderness Medicine Training Effect on Perceived Confidence Practicing in Deployed Environments. Letter to the Editor: Irregular Warfare Medicine. Response to Letter to the Editor: Medical Support to Irregular Warfare: A Systematic Literature Review, 2000-2024. Cross-sectional Comparison of Social Drivers of Health in The Million Veteran Program and Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2011-2023). Return to Duty Rates in Active-Duty Military: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Open Cervical Spine Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1