Long-term effects of various exercise training modalities on balance, gait and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Research Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1080/01616412.2025.2481427
Hakan Polat, Serkan Usgu
{"title":"Long-term effects of various exercise training modalities on balance, gait and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Hakan Polat, Serkan Usgu","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2481427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the long-term effects of vestibular exercises (VE), cervical stabilization exercises (CSE) and standard balance exercises (SBE) on balance, gait and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five patients were randomly allocated to three groups, performing different exercises three days a week for 12 weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline, at Week 12 and at a 6-month follow-up using the Functional Reach Test (FRT), Four-Square Step Test (FSST), 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 weeks, both CSE and VE groups improved on FRT and 2MWT, with the CSE group also experiencing improvements on FSST, TUG, and FIS (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The SBE group showed no significant changes. At 6 months, FRT, FSST, and 2MWT improvements persisted in the VE group, while the CSE group-maintained TUG and FIS gains. The VE group had superior FRT at 6 months, while the CSE group showed greater FSST improvements at 12 weeks. The VE group exhibited greater 2MWT improvements than the CSE group at 6 months, while the CSE group had better TUG results at both timepoints. Both CSE and VE groups showed greater reductions in fatigue (FIS) than the SBE group at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>VE provide long-term benefits for balance and gait speed, while CSE enhance gait endurance and postural control during training. Both modalities contribute to long-term fatigue reduction. SBE are less effective, highlighting the need for targeted interventions such as VE and CSE for sustained improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2481427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the long-term effects of vestibular exercises (VE), cervical stabilization exercises (CSE) and standard balance exercises (SBE) on balance, gait and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Methods: Thirty-five patients were randomly allocated to three groups, performing different exercises three days a week for 12 weeks. Assessments were conducted at baseline, at Week 12 and at a 6-month follow-up using the Functional Reach Test (FRT), Four-Square Step Test (FSST), 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS).

Results: At 12 weeks, both CSE and VE groups improved on FRT and 2MWT, with the CSE group also experiencing improvements on FSST, TUG, and FIS (p < 0.05). The SBE group showed no significant changes. At 6 months, FRT, FSST, and 2MWT improvements persisted in the VE group, while the CSE group-maintained TUG and FIS gains. The VE group had superior FRT at 6 months, while the CSE group showed greater FSST improvements at 12 weeks. The VE group exhibited greater 2MWT improvements than the CSE group at 6 months, while the CSE group had better TUG results at both timepoints. Both CSE and VE groups showed greater reductions in fatigue (FIS) than the SBE group at 6 months.

Discussion: VE provide long-term benefits for balance and gait speed, while CSE enhance gait endurance and postural control during training. Both modalities contribute to long-term fatigue reduction. SBE are less effective, highlighting the need for targeted interventions such as VE and CSE for sustained improvements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
期刊最新文献
Six-spot step test under three different task conditions to assess dual-task ability in people with multiple sclerosis. Long-term effects of various exercise training modalities on balance, gait and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled study. The relationship between serum GDF15 levels and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. Involvement of the disulfidptosis-related immune checkpoint gene, CD276, in glioblastoma malignant phenotype and poor prognosis. Exploring the impact of dietary factors on intracranial aneurysm risk: insights from Mendelian randomization analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1