Evaluation of Plasma Arginine Vasopressin During Hypertonic Saline Loading: A Comparison of Radioimmunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Peptides Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.peptides.2025.171392
Narantsatsral Daramjav, Junko Takagi, Fumio Nomura, Kazuo Otake, Akiyoshi Takami
{"title":"Evaluation of Plasma Arginine Vasopressin During Hypertonic Saline Loading: A Comparison of Radioimmunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.","authors":"Narantsatsral Daramjav, Junko Takagi, Fumio Nomura, Kazuo Otake, Akiyoshi Takami","doi":"10.1016/j.peptides.2025.171392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) measurement is critical for diagnosing central diabetes insipidus (CDI). Conventional radioimmunoassay (RIA) is widely used for AVP quantification, but its limited sensitivity, specificity, and dynamic range have prompted exploration of alternative methods. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has emerged as a promising technique for AVP measurement, offering potential advantages over RIA. This study aimed to evaluate LC-MS/MS performance for AVP quantification during hypertonic saline loading and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of RIA in differentiating CDI patients from controls. A total of 335 plasma samples were collected from 77 individuals-23 diagnosed with CDI and 54 controls-during hypertonic saline loading. AVP concentrations were measured using both LC-MS/MS and RIA. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon tests to compare AVP levels, correlation analysis between LC-MS/MS and RIA, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess diagnostic performance. LC-MS/MS demonstrated a lower detection limit (0.3pg/mL) and a broader quantification range than RIA. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between LC-MS/MS and RIA in the control group, but no correlation in the CDI group. ROC analysis indicated that LC-MS/MS provided diagnostic accuracy comparable to RIA for distinguishing CDI patients from controls. Bland-Altman analysis showed the agreement between two methods at the low range of AVP. LC-MS/MS offers equivalent specificity and sensitivity to RIA for AVP measurement, while providing added benefits in time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and differential diagnosis of CDI. These findings suggest that LC-MS/MS is a viable alternative to RIA for clinical AVP quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":19765,"journal":{"name":"Peptides","volume":" ","pages":"171392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peptides","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2025.171392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) measurement is critical for diagnosing central diabetes insipidus (CDI). Conventional radioimmunoassay (RIA) is widely used for AVP quantification, but its limited sensitivity, specificity, and dynamic range have prompted exploration of alternative methods. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has emerged as a promising technique for AVP measurement, offering potential advantages over RIA. This study aimed to evaluate LC-MS/MS performance for AVP quantification during hypertonic saline loading and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of RIA in differentiating CDI patients from controls. A total of 335 plasma samples were collected from 77 individuals-23 diagnosed with CDI and 54 controls-during hypertonic saline loading. AVP concentrations were measured using both LC-MS/MS and RIA. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon tests to compare AVP levels, correlation analysis between LC-MS/MS and RIA, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess diagnostic performance. LC-MS/MS demonstrated a lower detection limit (0.3pg/mL) and a broader quantification range than RIA. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between LC-MS/MS and RIA in the control group, but no correlation in the CDI group. ROC analysis indicated that LC-MS/MS provided diagnostic accuracy comparable to RIA for distinguishing CDI patients from controls. Bland-Altman analysis showed the agreement between two methods at the low range of AVP. LC-MS/MS offers equivalent specificity and sensitivity to RIA for AVP measurement, while providing added benefits in time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and differential diagnosis of CDI. These findings suggest that LC-MS/MS is a viable alternative to RIA for clinical AVP quantification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Peptides
Peptides 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
130
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Peptides is an international journal presenting original contributions on the biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology of biological active peptides, as well as their functions that relate to gastroenterology, endocrinology, and behavioral effects. Peptides emphasizes all aspects of high profile peptide research in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates. Special consideration can be given to plants and invertebrates. Submission of articles with clinical relevance is particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Plasma Arginine Vasopressin During Hypertonic Saline Loading: A Comparison of Radioimmunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Adropin: A Cardio-Metabolic Hormone in the Periphery, a Neurohormone in the Brain? Editorial Board Multifunctional incretin peptides in therapies for type 2 diabetes, obesity and associated co-morbidities A novel regulator of NLRP3 inflammasome: Peptides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1