Moderators of aerobic exercise effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Parkinsonism & related disorders Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779
Ryul Kim, Nyeonju Kang, Joon Ho Lee, Hanall Lee, Tae Lee Lee, Do Kyung Ko, Hajun Lee, Kyeongho Byun, Kiwon Park, Jee-Young Lee, Beomseok Jeon
{"title":"Moderators of aerobic exercise effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ryul Kim, Nyeonju Kang, Joon Ho Lee, Hanall Lee, Tae Lee Lee, Do Kyung Ko, Hajun Lee, Kyeongho Byun, Kiwon Park, Jee-Young Lee, Beomseok Jeon","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although growing evidence suggests that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), it remains unclear which specific aerobic exercise regimen optimizes improvement in these symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the effects of aerobic exercise on motor function in patients with PD according to exercise intervention protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (<four vs. ≥four sessions per week), period (<12 weeks vs. ≥12 weeks), and intensity (low-to-moderate vs. moderate-to-high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":" ","pages":"107779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although growing evidence suggests that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), it remains unclear which specific aerobic exercise regimen optimizes improvement in these symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the effects of aerobic exercise on motor function in patients with PD according to exercise intervention protocols.

Methods: Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (

Results: Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.

Conclusions: Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Moderators of aerobic exercise effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pure autonomic failure, phenoconversion phenomenon and autonomic non-motor subtype of Parkinson disease: The chicken or the egg? Comprehensive analysis of SLC17A5 variants in large European cohorts reveals no association with Parkinson's disease risk TOR1AIP2 as a candidate gene for dystonia-hemichorea/hemiballism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1