Predicting Future Acute Care Visit Risk in Kids With Asthma (PARKA): A Nested Cohort Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003336
Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Patricia Li, Meltem Tuna, Madhura Thipse, Nick Barrowman, Vid Bijelic, Naveen Poonai, Dominic Chalut, Roger Zemek, Eric I Benchimol, Francine M Ducharme
{"title":"Predicting Future Acute Care Visit Risk in Kids With Asthma (PARKA): A Nested Cohort Study.","authors":"Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Patricia Li, Meltem Tuna, Madhura Thipse, Nick Barrowman, Vid Bijelic, Naveen Poonai, Dominic Chalut, Roger Zemek, Eric I Benchimol, Francine M Ducharme","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits [emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations] within 1 year following a discharge from 1 of 2 tertiary care pediatric EDs in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assembled a nested Ontario cohort from the multicenter prospective DOORWAY cohort study and included children 1 to 17 years of age, with an ED visit for a moderate/severe asthma exacerbation. We linked this with provincial health administrative data. We used multivariable regression to derive and internally validate a practical clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 children [32% female, median age 3.0 years (IQR 1 to 7 y)] were included, and 58 experienced an asthma visit within the following year. These were best predicted by 4 factors: food allergy (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.9), family history of asthma (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9), prior acute asthma medical visits (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 0.9-8.6), and prior emergency room visits for any respiratory diagnosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4-6.4). A score of 0, 1, or 2 points was applied to each factor for up to a maximum of 6 points; the PARKA score has very good overall performance with a scaled Brier score of 0.11 on internal validation and good discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PARKA score predicts the risk of a future asthma acute care visit in a cohort of Ontario children with a moderate/severe asthma ED visit. Following external validation, this tool may aid ED clinicians in accurately targeting resource-intensive preventative interventions for at-risk children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to develop a clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits [emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations] within 1 year following a discharge from 1 of 2 tertiary care pediatric EDs in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We assembled a nested Ontario cohort from the multicenter prospective DOORWAY cohort study and included children 1 to 17 years of age, with an ED visit for a moderate/severe asthma exacerbation. We linked this with provincial health administrative data. We used multivariable regression to derive and internally validate a practical clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits.

Results: A total of 257 children [32% female, median age 3.0 years (IQR 1 to 7 y)] were included, and 58 experienced an asthma visit within the following year. These were best predicted by 4 factors: food allergy (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.9), family history of asthma (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9), prior acute asthma medical visits (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 0.9-8.6), and prior emergency room visits for any respiratory diagnosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4-6.4). A score of 0, 1, or 2 points was applied to each factor for up to a maximum of 6 points; the PARKA score has very good overall performance with a scaled Brier score of 0.11 on internal validation and good discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78).

Conclusions: The PARKA score predicts the risk of a future asthma acute care visit in a cohort of Ontario children with a moderate/severe asthma ED visit. Following external validation, this tool may aid ED clinicians in accurately targeting resource-intensive preventative interventions for at-risk children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Reply: Antivenom Administration Strategies in Pediatric Snake Envenomation. Reply: Comparing the Use of Crotaline-Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Versus Observation in Children. Response to Rohl S, Meredith M, Anderson T, et al. Comparing the Use of Crotaline-Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Versus Observation in Children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024;40(11):e270-e276. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Clinical Trends in Pediatric Intentional Self-Poisonings. Predicting Future Acute Care Visit Risk in Kids With Asthma (PARKA): A Nested Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1