Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Patricia Li, Meltem Tuna, Madhura Thipse, Nick Barrowman, Vid Bijelic, Naveen Poonai, Dominic Chalut, Roger Zemek, Eric I Benchimol, Francine M Ducharme
{"title":"Predicting Future Acute Care Visit Risk in Kids With Asthma (PARKA): A Nested Cohort Study.","authors":"Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Patricia Li, Meltem Tuna, Madhura Thipse, Nick Barrowman, Vid Bijelic, Naveen Poonai, Dominic Chalut, Roger Zemek, Eric I Benchimol, Francine M Ducharme","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop a clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits [emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations] within 1 year following a discharge from 1 of 2 tertiary care pediatric EDs in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assembled a nested Ontario cohort from the multicenter prospective DOORWAY cohort study and included children 1 to 17 years of age, with an ED visit for a moderate/severe asthma exacerbation. We linked this with provincial health administrative data. We used multivariable regression to derive and internally validate a practical clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 257 children [32% female, median age 3.0 years (IQR 1 to 7 y)] were included, and 58 experienced an asthma visit within the following year. These were best predicted by 4 factors: food allergy (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.9), family history of asthma (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9), prior acute asthma medical visits (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 0.9-8.6), and prior emergency room visits for any respiratory diagnosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4-6.4). A score of 0, 1, or 2 points was applied to each factor for up to a maximum of 6 points; the PARKA score has very good overall performance with a scaled Brier score of 0.11 on internal validation and good discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PARKA score predicts the risk of a future asthma acute care visit in a cohort of Ontario children with a moderate/severe asthma ED visit. Following external validation, this tool may aid ED clinicians in accurately targeting resource-intensive preventative interventions for at-risk children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to develop a clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits [emergency department (ED) visits or hospitalizations] within 1 year following a discharge from 1 of 2 tertiary care pediatric EDs in Ontario, Canada.
Methods: We assembled a nested Ontario cohort from the multicenter prospective DOORWAY cohort study and included children 1 to 17 years of age, with an ED visit for a moderate/severe asthma exacerbation. We linked this with provincial health administrative data. We used multivariable regression to derive and internally validate a practical clinical risk score to predict future asthma acute care visits.
Results: A total of 257 children [32% female, median age 3.0 years (IQR 1 to 7 y)] were included, and 58 experienced an asthma visit within the following year. These were best predicted by 4 factors: food allergy (OR 4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.9), family history of asthma (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9), prior acute asthma medical visits (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 0.9-8.6), and prior emergency room visits for any respiratory diagnosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4-6.4). A score of 0, 1, or 2 points was applied to each factor for up to a maximum of 6 points; the PARKA score has very good overall performance with a scaled Brier score of 0.11 on internal validation and good discrimination with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78).
Conclusions: The PARKA score predicts the risk of a future asthma acute care visit in a cohort of Ontario children with a moderate/severe asthma ED visit. Following external validation, this tool may aid ED clinicians in accurately targeting resource-intensive preventative interventions for at-risk children.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.