Volume Tolerance and Prognostic Impact of Hematoma Expansion in Deep and Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049008
Andrea Morotti, Qi Li, Jawed Nawabi, Federico Mazzacane, Frieder Schlunk, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Giorgio Busto, Anna Cavallini, Francesco Palmerini, Maurizio Paciaroni, Edip M Gurol, Anand Viswanathan, Ilaria Casetta, Laura Piccolo, Enrico Fainardi, Steven M Greenberg, Alessandro Padovani, Andrea Zini, Jonathan Rosand, Joseph P Broderick, Dar Dowlatshahi, Joshua N Goldstein
{"title":"Volume Tolerance and Prognostic Impact of Hematoma Expansion in Deep and Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage.","authors":"Andrea Morotti, Qi Li, Jawed Nawabi, Federico Mazzacane, Frieder Schlunk, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Giorgio Busto, Anna Cavallini, Francesco Palmerini, Maurizio Paciaroni, Edip M Gurol, Anand Viswanathan, Ilaria Casetta, Laura Piccolo, Enrico Fainardi, Steven M Greenberg, Alessandro Padovani, Andrea Zini, Jonathan Rosand, Joseph P Broderick, Dar Dowlatshahi, Joshua N Goldstein","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prognostic impact of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume varies according to location, with smaller volume tolerance in deep ICH, and hematoma expansion (HE) contributes to final ICH volume. We tested the hypothesis that HE influences outcome only when the final ICH volume achieves a critical threshold that differs according to ICH location.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients with supratentorial ICH admitted at 10 centers in North America and China (development cohort) and Europe (replication cohort). HE was defined as growth >33% and >6 mL. Location-specific (lobar versus deep) volume cutoffs for the prediction of poor outcomes were derived using receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index. The prognostic impact of HE stratified by location and final volume was explored with logistic regression (poor outcome: 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6), accounting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, baseline volume, intraventricular hemorrhage, and admission center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1774 patients with ICH in the development cohort and 1746 in the replication cohort. A total of 1058 (mean age, 68 years; 47.8% males) and 1423 (mean age, 71 years; 44.7% males) subjects met the inclusion criteria, respectively. The optimal final ICH volume cutoff for poor outcome differed by location: ≥36 mL for lobar and ≥17 mL for deep ICH. HE with final volume below the cutoff was not associated with higher odds of poor outcome compared with patients without HE (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 0.78-4.38]; <i>P</i>=0.163 in lobar ICH; adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.38-1.89]; <i>P</i>=0.685 in deep ICH). The combination of HE and final volume over the critical threshold was, however, significantly associated with poor prognosis, and the magnitude of this effect was substantial (adjusted odds ratio, 8.55 [95% CI, 2.87-25.48]; <i>P</i><0.001 in lobar ICH; adjusted odds ratio, 10.34 [95% CI, 2.86-37.44]; <i>P</i><0.001 in deep ICH). These findings were confirmed in the replication cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HE significantly impacts severe outcomes only when the final ICH volume exceeds a critical target threshold, and this threshold is lower in deep versus lobar ICH. These findings might inform clinical practice and future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prognostic impact of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) volume varies according to location, with smaller volume tolerance in deep ICH, and hematoma expansion (HE) contributes to final ICH volume. We tested the hypothesis that HE influences outcome only when the final ICH volume achieves a critical threshold that differs according to ICH location.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with supratentorial ICH admitted at 10 centers in North America and China (development cohort) and Europe (replication cohort). HE was defined as growth >33% and >6 mL. Location-specific (lobar versus deep) volume cutoffs for the prediction of poor outcomes were derived using receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden index. The prognostic impact of HE stratified by location and final volume was explored with logistic regression (poor outcome: 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 4-6), accounting for age, Glasgow Coma Scale, baseline volume, intraventricular hemorrhage, and admission center.

Results: We identified 1774 patients with ICH in the development cohort and 1746 in the replication cohort. A total of 1058 (mean age, 68 years; 47.8% males) and 1423 (mean age, 71 years; 44.7% males) subjects met the inclusion criteria, respectively. The optimal final ICH volume cutoff for poor outcome differed by location: ≥36 mL for lobar and ≥17 mL for deep ICH. HE with final volume below the cutoff was not associated with higher odds of poor outcome compared with patients without HE (adjusted odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 0.78-4.38]; P=0.163 in lobar ICH; adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.38-1.89]; P=0.685 in deep ICH). The combination of HE and final volume over the critical threshold was, however, significantly associated with poor prognosis, and the magnitude of this effect was substantial (adjusted odds ratio, 8.55 [95% CI, 2.87-25.48]; P<0.001 in lobar ICH; adjusted odds ratio, 10.34 [95% CI, 2.86-37.44]; P<0.001 in deep ICH). These findings were confirmed in the replication cohort.

Conclusions: HE significantly impacts severe outcomes only when the final ICH volume exceeds a critical target threshold, and this threshold is lower in deep versus lobar ICH. These findings might inform clinical practice and future trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Volume Tolerance and Prognostic Impact of Hematoma Expansion in Deep and Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Altered Functional Connectivity Between Cortical Premotor Areas and the Spinal Cord in Chronic Stroke. Impact of Direct Transfer to Angiography Suite on Treatment Time Metrics in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Low Hemoglobin Causes Hematoma Expansion and Poor Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes. Primary CNS Vasculitis With Spinal Cord Involvement: A 40-Year Single-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1