Exploring features of the physical environment as contributors to racial and ethnic disparities in sleep duration and efficiency among older adults.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Sleep Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf048
Dayna A Johnson, Laura Ward, Krysta Medearis, Kari Moore, Susan Redline
{"title":"Exploring features of the physical environment as contributors to racial and ethnic disparities in sleep duration and efficiency among older adults.","authors":"Dayna A Johnson, Laura Ward, Krysta Medearis, Kari Moore, Susan Redline","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Racial and ethnic sleep disparities have been documented; however, the mechanisms are unclear. In a cross-sectional analysis, we examined the contribution of features of the physical environment to sleep disparities among Black, Chinese, Hispanic, and White adults (N = 1945, average age: 68.5 ± 9.1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physical environment measures were self-reported (aesthetic quality, walking environment) and objectively measured via Geographic Information Systems (walking destination density, proportion of land dedicated to retail space, and overall built environment score). Sleep duration (short: <6 hours) and sleep efficiency were measured via 7-day actigraphy. Multilevel linear and Poisson regression models with robust variance were fit to examine associations with adjustment for covariates. Direct and indirect mediation was tested via path models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insufficient sleep was highest for minoritized individuals (short sleep: 32.5-44.1%, <85% sleep efficiency: 9.3-10.5%). Living in neighborhoods with higher aesthetic quality scores was associated with sleeping 5.8 minutes (0.67, 10.85) longer on average. Higher walking destination density, proportion retail, and built environment scores were associated with shorter sleep duration and higher prevalence of short sleep (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.0001 [1.0005, 1.0016], 1.02 [1.01, 1.04], and 1.06 [1.02, 1.09], respectively). Proportion retail partially explained the Black-White (2.8%) and Chinese-White (11.3%) difference in sleep duration. The Hispanic-White difference in sleep duration was partially (5.8-26.5%) explained by differences in aesthetic quality, walking destination density, proportion retail, and built environment score. There were no associations between features of the physical environment and sleep efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Features of the physical environment partially contributed to racial disparities in sleep duration and are a likely target for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12163123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: Racial and ethnic sleep disparities have been documented; however, the mechanisms are unclear. In a cross-sectional analysis, we examined the contribution of features of the physical environment to sleep disparities among Black, Chinese, Hispanic, and White adults (N = 1945, average age: 68.5 ± 9.1).

Methods: Physical environment measures were self-reported (aesthetic quality, walking environment) and objectively measured via Geographic Information Systems (walking destination density, proportion of land dedicated to retail space, and overall built environment score). Sleep duration (short: <6 hours) and sleep efficiency were measured via 7-day actigraphy. Multilevel linear and Poisson regression models with robust variance were fit to examine associations with adjustment for covariates. Direct and indirect mediation was tested via path models.

Results: Insufficient sleep was highest for minoritized individuals (short sleep: 32.5-44.1%, <85% sleep efficiency: 9.3-10.5%). Living in neighborhoods with higher aesthetic quality scores was associated with sleeping 5.8 minutes (0.67, 10.85) longer on average. Higher walking destination density, proportion retail, and built environment scores were associated with shorter sleep duration and higher prevalence of short sleep (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.0001 [1.0005, 1.0016], 1.02 [1.01, 1.04], and 1.06 [1.02, 1.09], respectively). Proportion retail partially explained the Black-White (2.8%) and Chinese-White (11.3%) difference in sleep duration. The Hispanic-White difference in sleep duration was partially (5.8-26.5%) explained by differences in aesthetic quality, walking destination density, proportion retail, and built environment score. There were no associations between features of the physical environment and sleep efficiency.

Conclusions: Features of the physical environment partially contributed to racial disparities in sleep duration and are a likely target for intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索自然环境的特征作为贡献者的种族和民族差异在睡眠时间和效率的老年人。
研究目标:种族和民族的睡眠差异已被记录;然而,其机制尚不清楚。在横断面分析中,我们研究了自然环境特征对黑人、华人、西班牙裔和白人成年人睡眠差异的影响(N=1945,平均年龄:68.5+9.1)。方法:物理环境测量采用自我报告(审美质量、步行环境)和地理信息系统客观测量(步行目的地密度、零售空间用地比例、整体建成环境得分)。睡眠时间(短):结果:睡眠不足在少数民族个体中最高(短睡眠:32.5-44.1%)。结论:物理环境的特征部分导致了睡眠时间的种族差异,这可能是干预的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
期刊最新文献
A wake-up call for a global climate and sleep task force. Modern lights on neuropathology of Alzheimer's Disease. Accelerometer-measured sleep habits in Danish children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years: a pooled analysis with 9,000 participants from six cross-sectional population-based studies. Transcriptomic recovery and persistence patterns reveal the biological cost of sleep debt in healthy adult males. 'How Did You Sleep Last Night?': Predicting Young Adults' Subjective Sleep Quality Through the Use of Multi-night Ambulatory Sleep EEG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1