{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of GPT-4 and resident physicians in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules.","authors":"Boxiong Wei, Xiumei Zhang, Yuhong Shao, Xiuming Sun, Luzeng Chen","doi":"10.3389/frai.2025.1512438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of the GPT-4 model in comparison to resident physicians in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasound images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 1,145 ultrasound images, including 632 malignant and 513 benign nodules. Both the GPT-4 model and two resident physicians independently classified the nodules using ultrasound images. The diagnostic accuracy of the resident physicians was determined by calculating the average of the individual accuracy rates of the two physicians and this was compared with the performance of the GPT-4 model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GPT-4 model correctly identified 367 out of 632 malignant nodules (58.07%) and 343 out of 513 benign nodules (66.86%). Resident physicians identified 467 malignant (73.89%) and 383 benign nodules (74.66%). There was a statistically significant difference in the classification of malignant nodules (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and benign nodules (<i>p</i> = 0.048) between the GPT-4 model and residents. GPT-4 performed better for larger nodules (>1 cm) at 65.38%, compared to 53.77% for smaller nodules (≤1 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The AUC for GPT-4 was 0.67, while residents achieved 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GPT-4 model shows potential in classifying thyroid nodules, but its diagnostic accuracy remains significantly lower than that of resident physicians, particularly for smaller malignant nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"1512438"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1512438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the GPT-4 model in comparison to resident physicians in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasound images.
Methods: This study analyzed 1,145 ultrasound images, including 632 malignant and 513 benign nodules. Both the GPT-4 model and two resident physicians independently classified the nodules using ultrasound images. The diagnostic accuracy of the resident physicians was determined by calculating the average of the individual accuracy rates of the two physicians and this was compared with the performance of the GPT-4 model.
Results: The GPT-4 model correctly identified 367 out of 632 malignant nodules (58.07%) and 343 out of 513 benign nodules (66.86%). Resident physicians identified 467 malignant (73.89%) and 383 benign nodules (74.66%). There was a statistically significant difference in the classification of malignant nodules (p < 0.001) and benign nodules (p = 0.048) between the GPT-4 model and residents. GPT-4 performed better for larger nodules (>1 cm) at 65.38%, compared to 53.77% for smaller nodules (≤1 cm, p = 0.004). The AUC for GPT-4 was 0.67, while residents achieved 0.75.
Conclusion: The GPT-4 model shows potential in classifying thyroid nodules, but its diagnostic accuracy remains significantly lower than that of resident physicians, particularly for smaller malignant nodules.
目的:比较GPT-4模型与住院医师在超声图像区分甲状腺结节良恶性方面的诊断性能。方法:分析超声图像1145张,其中恶性结节632张,良性结节513张。GPT-4模型和两名住院医师使用超声图像独立分类结节。住院医师的诊断准确性是通过计算两位医师的个人准确率的平均值来确定的,并将其与GPT-4模型的性能进行比较。结果:GPT-4模型正确识别632例恶性结节中的367例(58.07%),513例良性结节中的343例(66.86%)。住院医师发现恶性结节467例(73.89%),良性结节383例(74.66%)。GPT-4模型与居民恶性结节的分类差异有统计学意义(p p = 0.048)。GPT-4对较大结节(>.1 cm)的疗效为65.38%,而对较小结节(≤1 cm, p = 0.004)的疗效为53.77%。GPT-4的AUC为0.67,而居民达到0.75。结论:GPT-4模型在甲状腺结节分类方面具有一定的潜力,但其诊断准确率仍明显低于住院医师,特别是对于较小的恶性结节。