Comparison of the accuracy of GPT-4 and resident physicians in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules.

IF 4.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-03-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frai.2025.1512438
Boxiong Wei, Xiumei Zhang, Yuhong Shao, Xiuming Sun, Luzeng Chen
{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of GPT-4 and resident physicians in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules.","authors":"Boxiong Wei, Xiumei Zhang, Yuhong Shao, Xiuming Sun, Luzeng Chen","doi":"10.3389/frai.2025.1512438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic performance of the GPT-4 model in comparison to resident physicians in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasound images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 1,145 ultrasound images, including 632 malignant and 513 benign nodules. Both the GPT-4 model and two resident physicians independently classified the nodules using ultrasound images. The diagnostic accuracy of the resident physicians was determined by calculating the average of the individual accuracy rates of the two physicians and this was compared with the performance of the GPT-4 model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GPT-4 model correctly identified 367 out of 632 malignant nodules (58.07%) and 343 out of 513 benign nodules (66.86%). Resident physicians identified 467 malignant (73.89%) and 383 benign nodules (74.66%). There was a statistically significant difference in the classification of malignant nodules (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and benign nodules (<i>p</i> = 0.048) between the GPT-4 model and residents. GPT-4 performed better for larger nodules (>1 cm) at 65.38%, compared to 53.77% for smaller nodules (≤1 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The AUC for GPT-4 was 0.67, while residents achieved 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GPT-4 model shows potential in classifying thyroid nodules, but its diagnostic accuracy remains significantly lower than that of resident physicians, particularly for smaller malignant nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":33315,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"8 ","pages":"1512438"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11919898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1512438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the GPT-4 model in comparison to resident physicians in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasound images.

Methods: This study analyzed 1,145 ultrasound images, including 632 malignant and 513 benign nodules. Both the GPT-4 model and two resident physicians independently classified the nodules using ultrasound images. The diagnostic accuracy of the resident physicians was determined by calculating the average of the individual accuracy rates of the two physicians and this was compared with the performance of the GPT-4 model.

Results: The GPT-4 model correctly identified 367 out of 632 malignant nodules (58.07%) and 343 out of 513 benign nodules (66.86%). Resident physicians identified 467 malignant (73.89%) and 383 benign nodules (74.66%). There was a statistically significant difference in the classification of malignant nodules (p < 0.001) and benign nodules (p = 0.048) between the GPT-4 model and residents. GPT-4 performed better for larger nodules (>1 cm) at 65.38%, compared to 53.77% for smaller nodules (≤1 cm, p = 0.004). The AUC for GPT-4 was 0.67, while residents achieved 0.75.

Conclusion: The GPT-4 model shows potential in classifying thyroid nodules, but its diagnostic accuracy remains significantly lower than that of resident physicians, particularly for smaller malignant nodules.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GPT-4与住院医师鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节准确性的比较。
目的:比较GPT-4模型与住院医师在超声图像区分甲状腺结节良恶性方面的诊断性能。方法:分析超声图像1145张,其中恶性结节632张,良性结节513张。GPT-4模型和两名住院医师使用超声图像独立分类结节。住院医师的诊断准确性是通过计算两位医师的个人准确率的平均值来确定的,并将其与GPT-4模型的性能进行比较。结果:GPT-4模型正确识别632例恶性结节中的367例(58.07%),513例良性结节中的343例(66.86%)。住院医师发现恶性结节467例(73.89%),良性结节383例(74.66%)。GPT-4模型与居民恶性结节的分类差异有统计学意义(p p = 0.048)。GPT-4对较大结节(>.1 cm)的疗效为65.38%,而对较小结节(≤1 cm, p = 0.004)的疗效为53.77%。GPT-4的AUC为0.67,而居民达到0.75。结论:GPT-4模型在甲状腺结节分类方面具有一定的潜力,但其诊断准确率仍明显低于住院医师,特别是对于较小的恶性结节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
272
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The silent accumulation: AI as mental contaminant. Dynamic-focus transformer for point cloud segmentation. Few-shot deployment of pretrained MRI transformers in brain imaging tasks. Explainable AI in healthcare: a systematic review of XAI use cases in imaging, diagnostics, and rehabilitation. Benchmark datasets for predictive maintenance challenges in steel manufacturing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1