Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of major depressive disorder after brain trauma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100103
Ren-Xian Gao, Xiao-Na Zhang, Peng Zhu
{"title":"Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of major depressive disorder after brain trauma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ren-Xian Gao, Xiao-Na Zhang, Peng Zhu","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a considerable risk to human health. After TBI, individuals are susceptible to a range of psychiatric disorders, with depression being a primary complication. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently used in the treatment of depression; however, their efficacy in addressing major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults following TBI remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of SSRIs in the treatment of MDD after TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, encompassing studies published until May 2024. This review focused on studies that examined the efficacy of SSRIs in the treatment of MDD following TBI. Studies were assessed based sample size, treatment duration, treatment methodologies, severity of brain injury, assessment techniques, and drug response. A random-effects model was used to derive the summary effect size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies compared the reduction in depression scores in patients with MDD after TBI and SSRI treatment. The eight studies did not exhibit heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 38%). The depression score for MDD after TBI in the SSRI group decreased more than that in the control group [odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95%CI: 1.09-2.58, <i>P</i> = 0.02]. The adverse reactions after treatment included diarrhea, dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, or vomiting. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment between the two groups (OR 1.16, 95%CI: 0.78-1.73, <i>P</i> = 0.46]. These studies did not show significant heterogeneity (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SSRIs may be effective in treating patients with MDD after TBI. Adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 3","pages":"100103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.100103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a considerable risk to human health. After TBI, individuals are susceptible to a range of psychiatric disorders, with depression being a primary complication. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are frequently used in the treatment of depression; however, their efficacy in addressing major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults following TBI remains uncertain.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of SSRIs in the treatment of MDD after TBI.

Methods: A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, encompassing studies published until May 2024. This review focused on studies that examined the efficacy of SSRIs in the treatment of MDD following TBI. Studies were assessed based sample size, treatment duration, treatment methodologies, severity of brain injury, assessment techniques, and drug response. A random-effects model was used to derive the summary effect size.

Results: Eight studies compared the reduction in depression scores in patients with MDD after TBI and SSRI treatment. The eight studies did not exhibit heterogeneity (I 2 = 38%). The depression score for MDD after TBI in the SSRI group decreased more than that in the control group [odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95%CI: 1.09-2.58, P = 0.02]. The adverse reactions after treatment included diarrhea, dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, or vomiting. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment between the two groups (OR 1.16, 95%CI: 0.78-1.73, P = 0.46]. These studies did not show significant heterogeneity (I 2 = 44%).

Conclusion: SSRIs may be effective in treating patients with MDD after TBI. Adequately powered, randomized, controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂治疗脑外伤后重度抑郁症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:外伤性脑损伤(TBI)对人类健康构成相当大的威胁。创伤性脑损伤后,个体易患一系列精神疾病,抑郁症是主要并发症。选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)经常用于治疗抑郁症;然而,它们在治疗创伤性脑损伤后成人重度抑郁障碍(MDD)方面的疗效仍不确定。目的:探讨ssri类药物治疗脑外伤后重度抑郁症的疗效。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目声明中概述的指南,对多个数据库进行全面搜索,包括截至2024年5月发表的研究。本综述的重点是研究SSRIs治疗TBI后重度抑郁症的疗效。根据样本量、治疗时间、治疗方法、脑损伤严重程度、评估技术和药物反应对研究进行评估。采用随机效应模型推导总效应大小。结果:8项研究比较了TBI和SSRI治疗后MDD患者抑郁评分的降低。8项研究均未显示异质性(i2 = 38%)。SSRI组脑外伤后MDD抑郁评分下降幅度大于对照组[比值比(OR) 1.68, 95%CI: 1.09-2.58, P = 0.02]。治疗后不良反应包括腹泻、头晕、口干、恶心、呕吐。两组治疗后不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(OR 1.16, 95%CI: 0.78 ~ 1.73, P = 0.46)。这些研究没有显示出显著的异质性(i2 = 44%)。结论:SSRIs可有效治疗脑外伤后MDD。需要足够有力的、随机的、对照试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Impact of psychological nursing on anxiety, depression, wound healing, and satisfaction in patients with superficial basal cell carcinoma. Inadequacy of interventions to eliminate or reduce violence against healthcare professionals by patients and/or their relatives. Integrating electromyographic biofeedback in stroke rehabilitation: A paradigm shift in motor and psychological recovery. Internet plus-based post-discharge continuity care for mild-to-moderate depression: An exploratory study. L-shaped association between fasting blood glucose and comorbid anxiety in Chinese patients with first-episode untreated major depressive disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1