Energetic Value of Women's Work: Assessing Maternal Energetic Costs From Acorn Foraging

IF 2 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Journal of Biological Anthropology Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1002/ajpa.70023
Alexandra Niclou, Alexandra Greenwald, Cara Ocobock
{"title":"Energetic Value of Women's Work: Assessing Maternal Energetic Costs From Acorn Foraging","authors":"Alexandra Niclou,&nbsp;Alexandra Greenwald,&nbsp;Cara Ocobock","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Perceptions of female energetic contributions and their role in human evolution are limited. This exploratory study compares energy expenditure, return rate, and foraging efficiency between infant carrying methods in females simulating acorn foraging practices by Indigenous communities in western North America.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>After resting metabolic rate (RMR) was collected, female volunteers (<i>n</i> = 6, age: 21–37) conducted three 1-h bouts of acorn foraging. First, volunteers foraged unloaded (control) while for the second and third bouts they foraged carrying a traditional basketry cradle or a chest sling (randomized order) with 4.5 kg sandbags. Energy expenditure (EE) was measured through indirect calorimetry, physical activity intensity was assessed using accelerometry, and foraging return rates (RR) were calculated after acorn processing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The inter-bout results are not statistically significant. Findings show, however, that foraging RR largely surpasses EE irrespective of infant carrying method. The cradle carrying technique resulted in the largest mean EE, yet it was more efficient than the sling-carrying method. Most of the time foraging was spent at moderate physical intensity, especially during cradle-carrying bouts compared to the sling-carrying and control groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This small exploratory study demonstrates the caloric contributions by and foraging efficiency of females. Our findings emphasize that child-carrying techniques using basketry cradles allow for improved efficiency in foraging returns compared to more commonly used slings. Our results reinforce previous findings of female foraging efficiency despite the energetic demands of infant carrying and emphasize the energetic contributions of females to human evolution even during child-rearing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"186 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Perceptions of female energetic contributions and their role in human evolution are limited. This exploratory study compares energy expenditure, return rate, and foraging efficiency between infant carrying methods in females simulating acorn foraging practices by Indigenous communities in western North America.

Materials and Methods

After resting metabolic rate (RMR) was collected, female volunteers (n = 6, age: 21–37) conducted three 1-h bouts of acorn foraging. First, volunteers foraged unloaded (control) while for the second and third bouts they foraged carrying a traditional basketry cradle or a chest sling (randomized order) with 4.5 kg sandbags. Energy expenditure (EE) was measured through indirect calorimetry, physical activity intensity was assessed using accelerometry, and foraging return rates (RR) were calculated after acorn processing.

Results

The inter-bout results are not statistically significant. Findings show, however, that foraging RR largely surpasses EE irrespective of infant carrying method. The cradle carrying technique resulted in the largest mean EE, yet it was more efficient than the sling-carrying method. Most of the time foraging was spent at moderate physical intensity, especially during cradle-carrying bouts compared to the sling-carrying and control groups.

Conclusions

This small exploratory study demonstrates the caloric contributions by and foraging efficiency of females. Our findings emphasize that child-carrying techniques using basketry cradles allow for improved efficiency in foraging returns compared to more commonly used slings. Our results reinforce previous findings of female foraging efficiency despite the energetic demands of infant carrying and emphasize the energetic contributions of females to human evolution even during child-rearing.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女工作的能量价值:评估母亲采橡子的能量成本。
目的:对女性能量贡献及其在人类进化中的作用的认识是有限的。本探索性研究比较了北美西部土著社区雌性模拟橡子觅食行为的能量消耗、返回率和觅食效率。材料与方法:采集静息代谢率(RMR)后,女性志愿者(n = 6,年龄21-37岁)进行3次1 h的橡子采集。第一组,志愿者们在没有负重的情况下(对照组)觅食,而第二组和第三组,他们带着传统的篮子摇篮或吊带(随机排序)和4.5公斤的沙袋觅食。通过间接量热法测量能量消耗(EE),用加速度计评估体力活动强度,计算橡子加工后的觅食返回率(RR)。结果:两组间结果无统计学意义。然而,研究结果表明,无论婴儿携带方式如何,觅食RR都大大超过EE。摇篮搬运技术的平均EE最大,但比吊索搬运方法效率更高。与吊带组和对照组相比,大部分时间的觅食都是在中等体力强度下进行的,尤其是在抱摇篮的时候。结论:这项小型探索性研究证明了雌性的热量贡献和觅食效率。我们的研究结果强调,与更常用的吊带相比,使用篮子摇篮的儿童携带技术可以提高觅食回报的效率。我们的研究结果强化了之前的研究结果,即尽管生育婴儿需要能量,但女性的觅食效率很高,并强调了女性在养育子女过程中对人类进化的能量贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Isotopic Approach to Examining Mobility and Social Reorganization During the Bronze Age Transition in Ras Al Khaimah, UAE. RETRACTION: Berbers And Arabs: Tracing The Genetic Diversity And History of Southern Tunisia Through Genome Wide Analysis. Phylogenetic Influence on Bone Material Stiffness in the Mandibles of Cercopithecid Primates. AABA Task Force on the Ethical Study of Human Remains Recommendations: Proposal for the Management and Oversight of Community Partnership and Ethical Stewardship of Human Remains. Response to Garcia (2025).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1