Household members' positive personality traits and age stereotypes do not predict perceived expectations for active aging.

IF 3.7 2区 社会学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY European Journal of Ageing Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1007/s10433-025-00850-4
Sonja Radoš, Maria K Pavlova, Klaus Rothermund, Rainer K Silbereisen
{"title":"Household members' positive personality traits and age stereotypes do not predict perceived expectations for active aging.","authors":"Sonja Radoš, Maria K Pavlova, Klaus Rothermund, Rainer K Silbereisen","doi":"10.1007/s10433-025-00850-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The household represents a proximal social context whose members can convey various expectations to each other, including expectations for active aging. We used a nationally representative sample (N = 2007, aged 16-94 years) to investigate the household predictors of perceived expectations for active aging (PEAA, i.e., \"activation demands\" targeting individuals as older adults) in three domains: physical health, mental health, and social engagement. We considered household members' dispositional optimism, conscientiousness, age stereotypes, and the life goal of civic engagement. A set of preregistered multiple regression analyses indicated that, irrespective of age, household members' life goal of civic engagement had a positive effect on individual PEAA in the social engagement domain, which disappeared upon controlling for the respective individual life goal. In middle-aged and older adults, household members' conscientiousness unexpectedly had a significantly negative effect on individual PEAA in the physical health domain. Neither household members' dispositional optimism nor their domain-specific age stereotypes had significant associations with individual PEAA. Our findings suggest that household members' mindsets and attitudes play a limited role in predicting PEAA of individuals from the same household.</p>","PeriodicalId":47766,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ageing","volume":"22 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-025-00850-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The household represents a proximal social context whose members can convey various expectations to each other, including expectations for active aging. We used a nationally representative sample (N = 2007, aged 16-94 years) to investigate the household predictors of perceived expectations for active aging (PEAA, i.e., "activation demands" targeting individuals as older adults) in three domains: physical health, mental health, and social engagement. We considered household members' dispositional optimism, conscientiousness, age stereotypes, and the life goal of civic engagement. A set of preregistered multiple regression analyses indicated that, irrespective of age, household members' life goal of civic engagement had a positive effect on individual PEAA in the social engagement domain, which disappeared upon controlling for the respective individual life goal. In middle-aged and older adults, household members' conscientiousness unexpectedly had a significantly negative effect on individual PEAA in the physical health domain. Neither household members' dispositional optimism nor their domain-specific age stereotypes had significant associations with individual PEAA. Our findings suggest that household members' mindsets and attitudes play a limited role in predicting PEAA of individuals from the same household.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.90%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Ageing: Social, Behavioural and Health Perspectives is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the understanding of ageing in European societies and the world over. EJA publishes original articles on the social, behavioral and population health aspects of ageing and encourages an integrated approach between these aspects. Emphasis is put on publishing empirical research (including meta-analyses), but conceptual papers (including narrative reviews) and methodological contributions will also be considered. EJA welcomes expert opinions on critical issues in ageing. By stimulating communication between researchers and those using research findings, it aims to contribute to the formulation of better policies and the development of better practice in serving older adults. To further specify, with the term ''social'' is meant the full scope of social science of ageing related research from the micro to the macro level of analysis. With the term ''behavioural'' the full scope of psychological ageing research including life span approaches based on a range of age groups from young to old is envisaged. The term ''population health-related'' denotes social-epidemiological and public health oriented research including research on functional health in the widest possible sense.
期刊最新文献
The association between physical multimorbidity and fall-related injury among adults aged ≥ 50 years from low- and middle-income countries. Household members' positive personality traits and age stereotypes do not predict perceived expectations for active aging. Do publicly funded community physical activity programs for middle-aged and older adults in Ireland work? The effect of loneliness on depressive symptoms in the 65+ European population: a longitudinal observational study using SHARE data. Older adults know when they have been left out but they respond rationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1