Evaluation of a Fluorescence Immunoassay for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin Antigens.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1093/jalm/jfaf010
Elizabeth M Garrett, Meng Pu, April M Bobenchik
{"title":"Evaluation of a Fluorescence Immunoassay for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin Antigens.","authors":"Elizabeth M Garrett, Meng Pu, April M Bobenchik","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States, causing longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Accurate CDI diagnosis is essential for timely treatment and infection control. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI commonly involves the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and/or toxins A and B by immunoassays or the toxin genes by nucleic acid amplification. This study assesses the performance of a new commercial test, the Sofia® 2 C. difficile Fluorescent Immunoassay (Sofia 2; FIA; QuidelOrtho), for detecting C. difficile GDH and toxins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sofia 2 was compared to enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Techlab Inc.) and Immunocard (Meridian Bioscience) using remnant stool samples from 262 patients with suspected CDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sofia 2 demonstrated high agreement with the EIA methods for GDH (positive percentage agreement (PPA): 100%, negative percentage agreement (NPA): 94%, overall percentage of agreement (OPA): 95%) and toxins (PPA: 100%, NPA: 99%, OPA: 99%) detection. Compared to standard-of-care (SOC) testing including toxin gene PCR with the following toxin antigen test, Sofia 2 demonstrates strong PPA (100%), NPA (98%), positive predictive value (71%), and negative predictive value (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sofia 2 C. difficile FIA generates rapid results that are comparable to other commercial immunoassays with a simple workflow, supporting its use for CDI diagnosis in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"671-678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States, causing longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Accurate CDI diagnosis is essential for timely treatment and infection control. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI commonly involves the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and/or toxins A and B by immunoassays or the toxin genes by nucleic acid amplification. This study assesses the performance of a new commercial test, the Sofia® 2 C. difficile Fluorescent Immunoassay (Sofia 2; FIA; QuidelOrtho), for detecting C. difficile GDH and toxins.

Methods: Sofia 2 was compared to enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Techlab Inc.) and Immunocard (Meridian Bioscience) using remnant stool samples from 262 patients with suspected CDI.

Results: Sofia 2 demonstrated high agreement with the EIA methods for GDH (positive percentage agreement (PPA): 100%, negative percentage agreement (NPA): 94%, overall percentage of agreement (OPA): 95%) and toxins (PPA: 100%, NPA: 99%, OPA: 99%) detection. Compared to standard-of-care (SOC) testing including toxin gene PCR with the following toxin antigen test, Sofia 2 demonstrates strong PPA (100%), NPA (98%), positive predictive value (71%), and negative predictive value (100%).

Conclusions: Sofia 2 C. difficile FIA generates rapid results that are comparable to other commercial immunoassays with a simple workflow, supporting its use for CDI diagnosis in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荧光免疫法检测艰难梭菌谷氨酸脱氢酶及毒素抗原的评价。
背景:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是美国院内感染的主要原因,导致住院时间更长,发病率高,医疗费用增加。准确的CDI诊断对于及时治疗和控制感染至关重要。CDI的实验室诊断通常包括通过免疫分析检测谷氨酸脱氢酶(GDH)和/或毒素A和B,或通过核酸扩增检测毒素基因。本研究评估了一种新的商业测试的性能,Sofia®2艰难梭菌荧光免疫测定(Sofia 2;FIA;QuidelOrtho),用于检测艰难梭菌GDH和毒素。方法:对262例疑似CDI患者的残余粪便样本进行Sofia 2与酶免疫测定法(EIAs)、C. diff quick check Complete (Techlab Inc.)和Immunocard (Meridian Bioscience)进行比较。结果:Sofia 2与EIA方法在GDH(阳性一致百分比(PPA): 100%,阴性一致百分比(NPA): 94%,总体一致百分比(OPA): 95%)和毒素(PPA: 100%, NPA: 99%, OPA: 99%)检测方面具有很高的一致性。与标准护理(SOC)检测(包括毒素基因PCR和以下毒素抗原检测)相比,Sofia 2具有很强的PPA(100%)、NPA(98%)、阳性预测值(71%)和阴性预测值(100%)。结论:Sofia 2艰难梭菌FIA产生的快速结果与其他商业免疫测定方法相当,工作流程简单,支持其在临床实践中用于CDI诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
期刊最新文献
GFAP/UCH-L1 Assay for mTBI: Preanalytical Factors and Levels in Healthy Individuals-A Study on Danish Adults. A New IgG-λ Band during Therapy in Light-Chain Myeloma. Commentary on A New IgG-λ Band during Therapy in Light-Chain Myeloma. Current State and Needs of Clinical Laboratories in Latin America: A Cross-Country Assessment. Current Challenges and Needs of Clinical Laboratories in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Cross-Country Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1