Reliability between sarcopenia diagnosis by EWGSOP 1 and EWGSOP 2 criteria and association with clinical parameters in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Renal Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1053/j.jrn.2025.03.005
Laura Tavares Guimarães, Maryanne Zilli Canedo da Silva, Nayrana do Carmo Soares Reis, Jacqueline Costa Teixeira Caramori, Barbara Perez Vogt
{"title":"Reliability between sarcopenia diagnosis by EWGSOP 1 and EWGSOP 2 criteria and association with clinical parameters in maintenance hemodialysis patients.","authors":"Laura Tavares Guimarães, Maryanne Zilli Canedo da Silva, Nayrana do Carmo Soares Reis, Jacqueline Costa Teixeira Caramori, Barbara Perez Vogt","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the reliability between the sarcopenia criteria proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) 1 and 2, and to verify the association of clinical parameters with sarcopenia diagnosis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis including adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis. The assessment of lean mass was performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and the appendicular lean mass index was calculated. The assessment of muscle strength was performed using a handgrip dynamometer. The cutoff values considered for sarcopenia diagnosis were proposed by the EWGSOP 1 and EWGSOP 2 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>124 patients were included. The frequency of sarcopenia diagnosis was higher according to EWGSOP 1 (25.8%) than according to EWGSOP 2 (12.9%). The frequency of sarcopenia diagnoses diminished in both sexes. The reliability between the two criteria was moderate (κ = 0.597; p<0.001), and 87.1% of patients were classified equally by both criteria. In EWGSOP 1, the presence of diabetes and serum iron were significantly higher in the group with sarcopenia, and in EWGSOP 2 there was no such difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frequency of sarcopenia diagnosis in patients on hemodialysis was higher by EWGSOP 1 compared to EWGSOP 2, and the reliability between the criteria was moderate. Sarcopenia diagnosed by EWGSOP 1 was associated with diabetes and serum iron, which are factors that may be associated with sarcopenia pathogenesis. EWGSOP 2 was not associated with the clinical parameters assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2025.03.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the reliability between the sarcopenia criteria proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) 1 and 2, and to verify the association of clinical parameters with sarcopenia diagnosis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis including adult patients on maintenance hemodialysis. The assessment of lean mass was performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and the appendicular lean mass index was calculated. The assessment of muscle strength was performed using a handgrip dynamometer. The cutoff values considered for sarcopenia diagnosis were proposed by the EWGSOP 1 and EWGSOP 2 criteria.

Results: 124 patients were included. The frequency of sarcopenia diagnosis was higher according to EWGSOP 1 (25.8%) than according to EWGSOP 2 (12.9%). The frequency of sarcopenia diagnoses diminished in both sexes. The reliability between the two criteria was moderate (κ = 0.597; p<0.001), and 87.1% of patients were classified equally by both criteria. In EWGSOP 1, the presence of diabetes and serum iron were significantly higher in the group with sarcopenia, and in EWGSOP 2 there was no such difference.

Conclusion: The frequency of sarcopenia diagnosis in patients on hemodialysis was higher by EWGSOP 1 compared to EWGSOP 2, and the reliability between the criteria was moderate. Sarcopenia diagnosed by EWGSOP 1 was associated with diabetes and serum iron, which are factors that may be associated with sarcopenia pathogenesis. EWGSOP 2 was not associated with the clinical parameters assessed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Journal of Renal Nutrition 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Nutrition is devoted exclusively to renal nutrition science and renal dietetics. Its content is appropriate for nutritionists, physicians and researchers working in nephrology. Each issue contains a state-of-the-art review, original research, articles on the clinical management and education of patients, a current literature review, and nutritional analysis of food products that have clinical relevance.
期刊最新文献
Reliability between sarcopenia diagnosis by EWGSOP 1 and EWGSOP 2 criteria and association with clinical parameters in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Response letter to Comment on: The Effect of Antihypertensive Therapy on Skeletal Muscle Mass and Bone Mineral Density in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease. Nutritional intake and diet quality in hemodialysis patients: Scope for improvement. Navigating Nutrition Therapy for Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD). Plant-based Diet and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1