Julia Mo, Daniel Maeng, Mark C Hornbrook, Virginia Sun, Ruth C McCorkle, Ronald S Weinstein, Robert S Krouse
{"title":"A Bootstrap Method to Estimate Cost of Behavioral Intervention Implementation: A Proof of Concept.","authors":"Julia Mo, Daniel Maeng, Mark C Hornbrook, Virginia Sun, Ruth C McCorkle, Ronald S Weinstein, Robert S Krouse","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a bootstrapping method to augment time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis intended to allow more realistic cost estimates.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Secondary data from a multisite clinical trial conducted from 2016 to 2018 on an ostomy self-management telehealth intervention for cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The intervention cost was newly estimated by incorporating expected patient participation rates calculated via bootstrapping. This cost was compared against the cost estimate obtained via traditional TDABC.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Study personnel self-reported the time spent on each activity associated with the intervention. We also utilized patient participation data collected from the trial.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The total cost of the telehealth intervention estimated via the bootstrapping method was $210,052.62 (95% CI: 208,652.13, 211,402.51), with an average cost per participant of $1981.63 (95% CI: 1968.42, 1994.36). Traditional TDABC analysis yielded $186,363 or $1758 per participant. Further adjusting assumptions about the cost of the postintervention monitoring phase, our approach yielded an alternative estimate of $176,362.56 (95% CI: 174,962.07, 177,712.45) and an average cost per participant of $1663.80 (95% CI: 1650.59, 1676.53) suggesting both methods yielded similar bottom-line results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating bootstrapping into traditional TDABC methodology is feasible and is likely to capture variance in clinical trial data.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14608"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14608","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop a bootstrapping method to augment time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis intended to allow more realistic cost estimates.
Data sources: Secondary data from a multisite clinical trial conducted from 2016 to 2018 on an ostomy self-management telehealth intervention for cancer survivors.
Study design: The intervention cost was newly estimated by incorporating expected patient participation rates calculated via bootstrapping. This cost was compared against the cost estimate obtained via traditional TDABC.
Data collection: Study personnel self-reported the time spent on each activity associated with the intervention. We also utilized patient participation data collected from the trial.
Principal findings: The total cost of the telehealth intervention estimated via the bootstrapping method was $210,052.62 (95% CI: 208,652.13, 211,402.51), with an average cost per participant of $1981.63 (95% CI: 1968.42, 1994.36). Traditional TDABC analysis yielded $186,363 or $1758 per participant. Further adjusting assumptions about the cost of the postintervention monitoring phase, our approach yielded an alternative estimate of $176,362.56 (95% CI: 174,962.07, 177,712.45) and an average cost per participant of $1663.80 (95% CI: 1650.59, 1676.53) suggesting both methods yielded similar bottom-line results.
Conclusions: Incorporating bootstrapping into traditional TDABC methodology is feasible and is likely to capture variance in clinical trial data.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.