The Evolution of Emergency Front of Neck Access: A Historical Review.

IF 0.6 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY A&A practice Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001946
Caoimhe C Duffy, Lewis J Kaplan, Rodrigo J Daly Guris, Aron Wahrman, Paul A Baker, Ellen O'Sullivan, Gary A Bass
{"title":"The Evolution of Emergency Front of Neck Access: A Historical Review.","authors":"Caoimhe C Duffy, Lewis J Kaplan, Rodrigo J Daly Guris, Aron Wahrman, Paul A Baker, Ellen O'Sullivan, Gary A Bass","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Airway patency loss causes acute deoxygenation and carbon dioxide clearance failure and requires immediate intervention to prevent death. When less-invasive airway management approaches and technologies fail, the rescue algorithm end point is emergency front of neck access (eFONA), a high-risk, low-frequency intervention necessitating specialized training and regular skill maintenance. The historical evolution of surgical airway rescue reveals a progress arc from initial resistance to neck operations due to fear of complications, through acceptance of tracheal access for life-saving measures despite high complication rates, to the introduction of synthetic devices that maintain tracheal patency and reduce complications. Various civilizations independently and in parallel made significant observations and advancements in eFONA techniques. The evolution of eFONA underscores a balance between technological advancement and the need for a standardized lexicon and skillset that is regularly maintained by training protocols. Emphasizing the importance of eFONA training- akin to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification maintenance-can enhance readiness and proficiency among health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":56372,"journal":{"name":"A&A practice","volume":"19 3","pages":"e01946"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airway patency loss causes acute deoxygenation and carbon dioxide clearance failure and requires immediate intervention to prevent death. When less-invasive airway management approaches and technologies fail, the rescue algorithm end point is emergency front of neck access (eFONA), a high-risk, low-frequency intervention necessitating specialized training and regular skill maintenance. The historical evolution of surgical airway rescue reveals a progress arc from initial resistance to neck operations due to fear of complications, through acceptance of tracheal access for life-saving measures despite high complication rates, to the introduction of synthetic devices that maintain tracheal patency and reduce complications. Various civilizations independently and in parallel made significant observations and advancements in eFONA techniques. The evolution of eFONA underscores a balance between technological advancement and the need for a standardized lexicon and skillset that is regularly maintained by training protocols. Emphasizing the importance of eFONA training- akin to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification maintenance-can enhance readiness and proficiency among health care professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈部急救通道的演变:历史回顾。
气道失畅会导致急性脱氧和二氧化碳清除失败,需要立即干预以防止死亡。当侵入性较低的气道管理方法和技术失效时,抢救算法的终点就是紧急颈前通气(eFONA),这是一种高风险、低频率的干预措施,需要专业培训和定期技能维护。手术气道抢救的历史演变揭示了一个进步的弧线,从最初因害怕并发症而抵制颈部手术,到尽管并发症发生率高但仍接受气管插管以挽救生命,再到引入可保持气管通畅并减少并发症的合成装置。各种文明在 eFONA 技术方面独立和并行地进行了大量观察并取得了重大进展。eFONA 的发展强调了技术进步与通过培训协议定期维护标准化词汇和技能集的需求之间的平衡。强调 eFONA 培训的重要性--类似于心肺复苏术 (CPR) 认证的维护--可以提高医护专业人员的准备程度和熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
A&A practice
A&A practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊最新文献
Advancing Cultures of Organizational Resilience: The Next Chapter in Perioperative Well-Being. Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity-Induced Cardiac Arrest in a Young Patient During Anesthesia Induction: A Case Report. General Anesthesia With Remimazolam in Fontan Procedure: A Case Report. Continuous Quadroiliac Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Postoperative Functional Neurologic Disorder in a Freestanding Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1