Global cardiothoracic surgery: outcomes from a survey on current worldwide training programs.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivaf049
Rebekah Boyd, Justin Robinson, Rajika Jindani, Miia Lehtinen, Fabian Dorr, Alvaro Perazzo, Nqobile Manzini, Maroua Eid, Agneta Odera, Irbaz Hameed, Ahmed Youssef, Sharmil Kanna, Charles Jenkinson, Joseph Turek
{"title":"Global cardiothoracic surgery: outcomes from a survey on current worldwide training programs.","authors":"Rebekah Boyd, Justin Robinson, Rajika Jindani, Miia Lehtinen, Fabian Dorr, Alvaro Perazzo, Nqobile Manzini, Maroua Eid, Agneta Odera, Irbaz Hameed, Ahmed Youssef, Sharmil Kanna, Charles Jenkinson, Joseph Turek","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There are significant disparities in global access to cardiothoracic surgery. Training a diverse cohort of global cardiothoracic surgeons is a critical step. However, little is known about training pathways globally and there is a lack of standardization in training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Global Thoracic Surgery Residents' Association developed a 25-item survey covering the five domains of country of origin, access to cardiothoracic surgical training, variations in training, barriers and facilitators to training, and future plans of cardiothoracic surgery trainees. The survey was disseminated electronically and over social media platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 responses from trainees in 21 countries were received. Wide variations were found in training programs, including length of training, operative autonomy, reliance on simulation, trainee supervision, and minimum case requirements. Common barriers included discrimination, separation from family, and inadequate supervision and volume. Facilitators included participation in global rotations and mentorship. The majority (78%) of trainees plan on additional training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of standardization of trainee experience with extreme variations in global cardiothoracic training programs in terms of length of training, reliance on simulation, supervision, research opportunities, and minimum case requirements. These variations are opportunities to think forwards in terms of collectively working on standardization of trainee experience, developing innovative modalities to increase supervision of trainees, and recognizing trainee interest in research. There is a clear demand for increased global collaboration and the transfer of knowledge and techniques in addition to trainee recognition of need for further training.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: There are significant disparities in global access to cardiothoracic surgery. Training a diverse cohort of global cardiothoracic surgeons is a critical step. However, little is known about training pathways globally and there is a lack of standardization in training.

Methods: The Global Thoracic Surgery Residents' Association developed a 25-item survey covering the five domains of country of origin, access to cardiothoracic surgical training, variations in training, barriers and facilitators to training, and future plans of cardiothoracic surgery trainees. The survey was disseminated electronically and over social media platforms.

Results: A total of 73 responses from trainees in 21 countries were received. Wide variations were found in training programs, including length of training, operative autonomy, reliance on simulation, trainee supervision, and minimum case requirements. Common barriers included discrimination, separation from family, and inadequate supervision and volume. Facilitators included participation in global rotations and mentorship. The majority (78%) of trainees plan on additional training.

Conclusions: There is a lack of standardization of trainee experience with extreme variations in global cardiothoracic training programs in terms of length of training, reliance on simulation, supervision, research opportunities, and minimum case requirements. These variations are opportunities to think forwards in terms of collectively working on standardization of trainee experience, developing innovative modalities to increase supervision of trainees, and recognizing trainee interest in research. There is a clear demand for increased global collaboration and the transfer of knowledge and techniques in addition to trainee recognition of need for further training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global cardiothoracic surgery: outcomes from a survey on current worldwide training programs. Impact of diaphragm paralysis and its surgical interventions on outcomes after the staged Fontan procedure. Role of tricuspid valve repair in pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum: fresh autologous pericardium as a viable option. Usefulness of serial N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide values after biventricular repair in patients with borderline hypoplastic left ventricle. Contribution of cardiac surgeons in transcatheter aortic valve replacement activity in France.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1