Preferences for Selecting and Initiating Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia: Results From the US DECIDE Survey.

Schizophrenia bulletin open Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf001
Dawn Velligan, Gregory D Salinas, Emily Belcher, Kelli R Franzenburg, Mark Suett, Stephen Thompson, Rolf T Hansen
{"title":"Preferences for Selecting and Initiating Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia: Results From the US DECIDE Survey.","authors":"Dawn Velligan, Gregory D Salinas, Emily Belcher, Kelli R Franzenburg, Mark Suett, Stephen Thompson, Rolf T Hansen","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) improve adherence and reduce schizophrenia relapse rates. Data on which LAI attributes drive clinician preference are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the DECIDE survey, 380 psychiatric clinicians (psychiatrists, psychiatric nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) were surveyed regarding preferences when selecting and initiating LAIs for patients with schizophrenia. Responses were analyzed by clinician use of LAIs (high [≥ 31% of their patients using LAIs] or low [≤ 14% of their patients using LAIs]) and mindset toward LAI use (early, severity reserved, adherence reserved, and LAI hesitant).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall and across subgroups, side effects were the most important consideration when selecting a particular LAI, with 33% of clinicians ranking this as most important (26%-46% across subgroups). Clinician preference for the molecule was most often ranked least important (47% overall; 39%-59% across subgroups). A significantly higher proportion of clinicians with high vs low LAI use ranked product attributes as the most important consideration (26% vs 13%; <i>P</i> < .01). Across subgroups, multiple injection site options, small/on par needle, and price made at least two-thirds of clinicians somewhat/much more likely to use a particular LAI, and 63%-82% of clinicians reported being somewhat/much more likely to select an LAI dosed once monthly or less often vs 6%-11% being somewhat/much more likely to select an LAI dosed once every 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, results from DECIDE provide insight into the decision-making process of psychiatric clinicians when selecting an LAI and highlight opportunities to help clinicians deliver optimal care for patients with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94380,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","volume":"6 1","pages":"sgaf001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia bulletin open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgaf001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) improve adherence and reduce schizophrenia relapse rates. Data on which LAI attributes drive clinician preference are limited.

Methods: In the DECIDE survey, 380 psychiatric clinicians (psychiatrists, psychiatric nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) were surveyed regarding preferences when selecting and initiating LAIs for patients with schizophrenia. Responses were analyzed by clinician use of LAIs (high [≥ 31% of their patients using LAIs] or low [≤ 14% of their patients using LAIs]) and mindset toward LAI use (early, severity reserved, adherence reserved, and LAI hesitant).

Results: Overall and across subgroups, side effects were the most important consideration when selecting a particular LAI, with 33% of clinicians ranking this as most important (26%-46% across subgroups). Clinician preference for the molecule was most often ranked least important (47% overall; 39%-59% across subgroups). A significantly higher proportion of clinicians with high vs low LAI use ranked product attributes as the most important consideration (26% vs 13%; P < .01). Across subgroups, multiple injection site options, small/on par needle, and price made at least two-thirds of clinicians somewhat/much more likely to use a particular LAI, and 63%-82% of clinicians reported being somewhat/much more likely to select an LAI dosed once monthly or less often vs 6%-11% being somewhat/much more likely to select an LAI dosed once every 2 weeks.

Conclusions: Overall, results from DECIDE provide insight into the decision-making process of psychiatric clinicians when selecting an LAI and highlight opportunities to help clinicians deliver optimal care for patients with schizophrenia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-life Affective Forecasting in Young Adults with High Social Anhedonia: An Experience Sampling Study. A Review of Reviews of Patient-Reported Measures in Psychosis: Need to Consider Factors Affecting Equity and the Involvement of Patients. Preferences for Selecting and Initiating Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Agents for the Treatment of Patients With Schizophrenia: Results From the US DECIDE Survey. The Startle Response and Prepulse Inhibition in Psychosis and Violence: A Combined Electromyography and Electroencephalography Study. Associations Between Klotho Levels, KL-VS Heterozygosity and Cognition in Schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1