Digital Technologies for Social Supply Chain Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis Through the Lens of Dynamic Capabilities and Complexity Theory

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3524896
Prerna Malakar;Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan;Angappa Gunasekaran;Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik
{"title":"Digital Technologies for Social Supply Chain Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis Through the Lens of Dynamic Capabilities and Complexity Theory","authors":"Prerna Malakar;Sharfuddin Ahmed Khan;Angappa Gunasekaran;Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3524896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies (DTs) have fundamentally transformed business landscapes, particularly supply chain (SC) management. This study aims to explore the role of Industry 4.0 DTs in advancing social sustainability in SCs, focusing on transparency, visibility, and traceability as key mediators. The study draws its theoretical foundation from dynamic capabilities theory and complexity theory, providing a dual perspective on the role of DTs in SC sustainability. The study employs survey data collected from 250 experts from the manufacturing sector in Pakistan to evaluate these relationships. The study utilizes partial least squares-structural equation modeling for hypothesis testing. Key findings indicate that Industry 4.0 technologies positively impact social SC sustainability, both directly and indirectly, through enhanced traceability, transparency, and visibility. Notably, traceability emerged as the strongest mediator, highlighting the critical role of tracking in ensuring ethical labor practices and preventing social issues such as modern slavery and unsafe working conditions. The research further suggests that adopting Industry 4.0 technologies can drive improvements in labor standards, environmental practices, and overall SC responsibility. The study contributes to the growing body of literature by demonstrating how Industry 4.0 technologies can serve as strategic tools for addressing social issues within SCs, thereby promoting compliance with global ethical standards and enhancing sustainability.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"664-675"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10833677/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital technologies (DTs) have fundamentally transformed business landscapes, particularly supply chain (SC) management. This study aims to explore the role of Industry 4.0 DTs in advancing social sustainability in SCs, focusing on transparency, visibility, and traceability as key mediators. The study draws its theoretical foundation from dynamic capabilities theory and complexity theory, providing a dual perspective on the role of DTs in SC sustainability. The study employs survey data collected from 250 experts from the manufacturing sector in Pakistan to evaluate these relationships. The study utilizes partial least squares-structural equation modeling for hypothesis testing. Key findings indicate that Industry 4.0 technologies positively impact social SC sustainability, both directly and indirectly, through enhanced traceability, transparency, and visibility. Notably, traceability emerged as the strongest mediator, highlighting the critical role of tracking in ensuring ethical labor practices and preventing social issues such as modern slavery and unsafe working conditions. The research further suggests that adopting Industry 4.0 technologies can drive improvements in labor standards, environmental practices, and overall SC responsibility. The study contributes to the growing body of literature by demonstrating how Industry 4.0 technologies can serve as strategic tools for addressing social issues within SCs, thereby promoting compliance with global ethical standards and enhancing sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字技术促进社会供应链可持续发展:基于动态能力和复杂性理论的实证分析
数字技术已经从根本上改变了商业格局,尤其是供应链管理。本研究旨在探讨工业4.0技术在推动社会可持续发展方面的作用,重点关注透明度、可见性和可追溯性作为关键中介。本研究以动态能力理论和复杂性理论为理论基础,从双重视角研究了dt在供应链可持续性中的作用。这项研究采用了从巴基斯坦制造业的250名专家那里收集的调查数据来评估这些关系。本研究采用偏最小二乘-结构方程模型进行假设检验。主要研究结果表明,工业4.0技术通过增强可追溯性、透明度和可见性,直接或间接地对社会供应链的可持续性产生积极影响。值得注意的是,可追溯性成为最强的中介,突出了跟踪在确保道德劳动实践和防止现代奴隶制和不安全工作条件等社会问题方面的关键作用。研究进一步表明,采用工业4.0技术可以推动劳动标准、环境实践和整体供应链责任的改善。该研究通过展示工业4.0技术如何作为解决社会问题的战略工具,从而促进遵守全球道德标准并提高可持续性,为越来越多的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Launch Strategy for Green Innovative Products Considering Recall Risk: Timing and Product Portfolio Decisions Drivers of Social Media Engagement on Organizational Communication on Sustainable Technological Innovation: Insights From Developed and Developing Countries How Dare You Refuse Me? How and When AI Negative Hiring Decision Influences Applicants’ Reactions Combinatorial Network Resilience in Knowledge-Based Supply Chains: Optimal Recovery Strategies Under Targeted Attacks Strategic Platform Configuration: Network Position, Environmental Conditions, and Integration Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1