An Integrated Framework of Multidisciplinary Decision Making Under Uncertainty for Sustainable Infrastructure Development

IF 5.2 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2025.3540270
Bin Xue;Kexin Chang;Yufeng Fan;Xingbin Chen;Tae Wan Kim;Bingsheng Liu
{"title":"An Integrated Framework of Multidisciplinary Decision Making Under Uncertainty for Sustainable Infrastructure Development","authors":"Bin Xue;Kexin Chang;Yufeng Fan;Xingbin Chen;Tae Wan Kim;Bingsheng Liu","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3540270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainty management in multidisciplinary decision making (MDM) involving stakeholders with discipline-specific expertise is imperative for the operations of developing urban infrastructure projects with multidimensional sustainability goals. Preference uncertainty and outcome uncertainty must be addressed simultaneously for theorizing and modeling in such MDM processes. Thus, in this article, we formalize an integrated MDM (iMDM) system to consistently mitigate preference uncertainty in decision alternative evaluation and expeditiously manage outcome uncertainty in decision alternative selection. Unlike the existing decision-making methods that often overlook different uncertainty characteristics in multidisciplinary operations management, the proposed system accounts for both uncertainties by specified information representation and integrated information optimization to enlarge decision spaces. Empirical evaluations in three real-world scenarios indicate that the iMDM system can mitigate and manage uncertainty to derive distinguishable alternative rankings and to generate optimized Pareto alternative sets. We further validate the effectiveness of the system using Charrette tests by quantifying the consistency and expeditiousness of both managing uncertainty and deriving desirable decision alternatives. Our contributions build upon the theoretical foundation of MDM under uncertainty and extend sustainable operations management science by clarifying decision information rationales from an uncertainty management perspective. Practically, findings benefit infrastructure operations’ managers and urban planners in making sustainability decisions in visualized, integrated, and automated manners.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"751-767"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10878794/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty management in multidisciplinary decision making (MDM) involving stakeholders with discipline-specific expertise is imperative for the operations of developing urban infrastructure projects with multidimensional sustainability goals. Preference uncertainty and outcome uncertainty must be addressed simultaneously for theorizing and modeling in such MDM processes. Thus, in this article, we formalize an integrated MDM (iMDM) system to consistently mitigate preference uncertainty in decision alternative evaluation and expeditiously manage outcome uncertainty in decision alternative selection. Unlike the existing decision-making methods that often overlook different uncertainty characteristics in multidisciplinary operations management, the proposed system accounts for both uncertainties by specified information representation and integrated information optimization to enlarge decision spaces. Empirical evaluations in three real-world scenarios indicate that the iMDM system can mitigate and manage uncertainty to derive distinguishable alternative rankings and to generate optimized Pareto alternative sets. We further validate the effectiveness of the system using Charrette tests by quantifying the consistency and expeditiousness of both managing uncertainty and deriving desirable decision alternatives. Our contributions build upon the theoretical foundation of MDM under uncertainty and extend sustainable operations management science by clarifying decision information rationales from an uncertainty management perspective. Practically, findings benefit infrastructure operations’ managers and urban planners in making sustainability decisions in visualized, integrated, and automated manners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基础设施可持续发展不确定性下多学科决策集成框架
多学科决策(MDM)中的不确定性管理涉及具有特定学科专业知识的利益相关者,这对于开发具有多维可持续性目标的城市基础设施项目的运营至关重要。在这种MDM过程中,必须同时解决偏好不确定性和结果不确定性,以便进行理论化和建模。因此,在本文中,我们形式化了一个集成的MDM (iMDM)系统,以一致地减轻决策替代评估中的偏好不确定性,并快速管理决策替代选择中的结果不确定性。不同于现有的多学科运营管理决策方法往往忽略了不同的不确定性特征,本文提出的系统通过指定的信息表示和集成的信息优化来考虑不确定性,以扩大决策空间。在三种现实场景下的经验评估表明,iMDM系统可以减轻和管理不确定性,从而得出可区分的备选排名,并生成优化的帕累托备选集。通过量化管理不确定性和得出理想决策方案的一致性和快速性,我们进一步验证了系统的有效性。我们的贡献建立在不确定性下MDM的理论基础之上,并通过从不确定性管理的角度阐明决策信息的基本原理,扩展了可持续运营管理科学。实际上,研究结果有利于基础设施运营经理和城市规划者以可视化、综合和自动化的方式做出可持续发展决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Launch Strategy for Green Innovative Products Considering Recall Risk: Timing and Product Portfolio Decisions Drivers of Social Media Engagement on Organizational Communication on Sustainable Technological Innovation: Insights From Developed and Developing Countries How Dare You Refuse Me? How and When AI Negative Hiring Decision Influences Applicants’ Reactions Combinatorial Network Resilience in Knowledge-Based Supply Chains: Optimal Recovery Strategies Under Targeted Attacks Strategic Platform Configuration: Network Position, Environmental Conditions, and Integration Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1