Sample preparation procedures for elemental analysis of critical raw materials in lithium-ion battery black mass: Challenges responding to the supplementary battery recycling regulation.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124973
Alessandra Zanoletti, Antonella Cornelio, Laura Borgese, Giacomo Siviero, Amedeo Cinosi, Elisa Galli, Elza Bontempi
{"title":"Sample preparation procedures for elemental analysis of critical raw materials in lithium-ion battery black mass: Challenges responding to the supplementary battery recycling regulation.","authors":"Alessandra Zanoletti, Antonella Cornelio, Laura Borgese, Giacomo Siviero, Amedeo Cinosi, Elisa Galli, Elza Bontempi","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of black mass (BM) composition is critical for implementing the European Commission's proposed methodology for calculating and verifying recycling efficiency and material recovery from waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). BM, derived from spent LIBs, presents analytical challenges due to its complex matrix and high-carbon content, which can impede complete dissolution and bias recovery calculations. Incomplete BM digestion and inconsistencies in analytical methods can lead to overestimated recycling efficiencies. This study evaluates and optimizes sample preparation strategies, including digestion protocols and analytical techniques, to reliably extract and quantify critical metals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and manganese. To address these issues, we propose standardized digestion procedures and highlight the suitability of techniques like TXRF, which mitigate matrix effects and enhance data reliability. This research underscores the importance of defining clear standards and methodologies in the regulatory framework, ensuring that reported recovery rates accurately reflect true recycling efficiencies. Finally, this work proposes some regulatory and policy improvements, intending to better align with the EU's sustainability goals, promoting reliable data, advancing circular economy objectives, and supporting the broader energy transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"380 ","pages":"124973"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of black mass (BM) composition is critical for implementing the European Commission's proposed methodology for calculating and verifying recycling efficiency and material recovery from waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). BM, derived from spent LIBs, presents analytical challenges due to its complex matrix and high-carbon content, which can impede complete dissolution and bias recovery calculations. Incomplete BM digestion and inconsistencies in analytical methods can lead to overestimated recycling efficiencies. This study evaluates and optimizes sample preparation strategies, including digestion protocols and analytical techniques, to reliably extract and quantify critical metals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and manganese. To address these issues, we propose standardized digestion procedures and highlight the suitability of techniques like TXRF, which mitigate matrix effects and enhance data reliability. This research underscores the importance of defining clear standards and methodologies in the regulatory framework, ensuring that reported recovery rates accurately reflect true recycling efficiencies. Finally, this work proposes some regulatory and policy improvements, intending to better align with the EU's sustainability goals, promoting reliable data, advancing circular economy objectives, and supporting the broader energy transition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锂离子电池黑质量中关键原材料元素分析的样品制备程序:应对电池补充回收法规的挑战
准确评估黑质量(BM)成分对于实施欧盟委员会提出的计算和验证废旧锂离子电池(lib)的回收效率和材料回收率的方法至关重要。BM来自废lib,由于其复杂的基质和高碳含量,可能会阻碍完全溶解和偏置回收率的计算,因此在分析上存在挑战。BM消化不完全和分析方法不一致可能导致高估回收效率。本研究评估和优化了样品制备策略,包括消化方案和分析技术,以可靠地提取和量化锂、钴、镍和锰等关键金属。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了标准化的消化程序,并强调了TXRF等技术的适用性,以减轻矩阵效应并提高数据可靠性。这项研究强调了在监管框架中定义明确标准和方法的重要性,以确保报告的回收率准确反映真正的回收效率。最后,本工作提出了一些监管和政策改进,旨在更好地与欧盟的可持续发展目标保持一致,促进可靠的数据,推进循环经济目标,并支持更广泛的能源转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Performance-informed life cycle assessment of waste-derived asphalt mixtures for full aggregate replacement Antimicrobial resistance genes in biosolid-amended pasture soils: Insights from a pilot study on a sheep farm Response strategies of bacterial and micro-eukaryotic communities to environmental changes: Evidence from alpine lakes sedimentary DNA in Southwest China Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification microbial fuel cells (SND-MFC) for nitrogen removal and bioelectricity recovery: a review of performances, mechanisms, microorganisms, and applications Response of microbial nitrogen removal to sinuosity in river bends: mechanisms and development of physics-informed neural networks model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1