Which carbon footprint for my ICU? Benchmark, hot spots and perspectives.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s13613-025-01445-z
Pierre Bardoult, Elodie Cadic, Olivier Brichory, Véronique Marie, Caroline Rouxel, Christophe Millet, Magalie Daudin, Elodie Peguet, Nicolas Massart
{"title":"Which carbon footprint for my ICU? Benchmark, hot spots and perspectives.","authors":"Pierre Bardoult, Elodie Cadic, Olivier Brichory, Véronique Marie, Caroline Rouxel, Christophe Millet, Magalie Daudin, Elodie Peguet, Nicolas Massart","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01445-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify the main greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting activities or products among the medical devices (MD) and medicines used in a polyvalent Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pragmatic eco-audit was conducted in a 21-beds polyvalent ICU, in Saint-Brieuc, Bretagne, France. It consisted of estimating GHG emissions of products or activities, considering process-based life cycle analysis (LCA), economic input-output analysis (EIO) and hybrid-LCA. Results were expressed as Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) emissions per patient-day considering each medication and MD (including personal protective equipment).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With remaining uncertainty, GHG emissions were estimated at 61.1 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day. Two hundred and two individual MD were used per patient-day, equivalent to 5.1 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day (process-based LCA). Gloves accounted for the main part of kgCO<sub>2</sub>e emissions (representing 1.8 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day). Then, syringes (1.1 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day), perfusion tubings (1.0 per patient-day) and gauze pads (0.4 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day) were the most important sources of MD related GHG emissions. Forty-seven individual medicines were used per patient-day. Most consumed medications were sterile water for injection, propofol, and sodium chlorure. The GHG emissions of medications were estimated with EIO-LCA at 21.5 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day, mostly due to injectable medicines (15.3 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e per patient-day).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upcoming studies focusing on actions on these particular hot spots would be of interest in order to significantly decrease GHG emissions but also to increase resilience of critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01445-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify the main greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting activities or products among the medical devices (MD) and medicines used in a polyvalent Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods: A pragmatic eco-audit was conducted in a 21-beds polyvalent ICU, in Saint-Brieuc, Bretagne, France. It consisted of estimating GHG emissions of products or activities, considering process-based life cycle analysis (LCA), economic input-output analysis (EIO) and hybrid-LCA. Results were expressed as Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) emissions per patient-day considering each medication and MD (including personal protective equipment).

Results: With remaining uncertainty, GHG emissions were estimated at 61.1 kgCO2e per patient-day. Two hundred and two individual MD were used per patient-day, equivalent to 5.1 kgCO2e per patient-day (process-based LCA). Gloves accounted for the main part of kgCO2e emissions (representing 1.8 kgCO2e per patient-day). Then, syringes (1.1 kgCO2e per patient-day), perfusion tubings (1.0 per patient-day) and gauze pads (0.4 kgCO2e per patient-day) were the most important sources of MD related GHG emissions. Forty-seven individual medicines were used per patient-day. Most consumed medications were sterile water for injection, propofol, and sodium chlorure. The GHG emissions of medications were estimated with EIO-LCA at 21.5 kgCO2e per patient-day, mostly due to injectable medicines (15.3 kgCO2e per patient-day).

Conclusion: Upcoming studies focusing on actions on these particular hot spots would be of interest in order to significantly decrease GHG emissions but also to increase resilience of critical care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICU的碳足迹是多少?基准、热点和前景。
背景:本研究的目的是确定多价重症监护病房(ICU)使用的医疗器械(MD)和药物中主要的温室气体(GHG)排放活动或产物。方法:对法国布列塔尼圣布里厄的21张床位的多价ICU进行实用生态审计。它包括产品或活动的温室气体排放估算,考虑了基于过程的生命周期分析(LCA)、经济投入产出分析(EIO)和混合生命周期分析。考虑到每种药物和MD(包括个人防护装备),结果以每个患者每天的二氧化碳当量(CO2e)排放量表示。结果:考虑到剩余的不确定性,估计每位患者每天的温室气体排放量为61.1 kgCO2e。每个患者每天使用202个个体MD,相当于每个患者每天5.1千克二氧化碳当量(基于流程的LCA)。手套占二氧化碳排放量的主要部分(每病人每天排放1.8公斤二氧化碳)。然后,注射器(1.1 kgCO2e /患者日)、灌注管(1.0 kgCO2e /患者日)和纱布垫(0.4 kgCO2e /患者日)是MD相关温室气体排放的最重要来源。每个病人每天使用47种药物。消耗最多的药物是无菌注射用水、异丙酚和氯酸钠。根据EIO-LCA估计,药物的温室气体排放量为每患者每天21.5千克二氧化碳当量,主要是由于注射药物(每患者每天15.3千克二氧化碳当量)。结论:为了显著减少温室气体排放,并提高重症监护的恢复能力,未来的研究将关注这些特定热点的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Applied physiology at the bedside: using invasive blood pressure as a true monitoring tool. Contact precautions prevent cross-contamination of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in an intensive care unit: a prospective observational study. Choosing wisely: comparing the carbon footprint of three respiratory sampling techniques for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Spectrum, dose, and duration of antibiotic exposure and risk of intensive care unit-acquired carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a prospective cohort study. Bedside ventilatory settings guided by respiratory mechanics in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1