Neighborhood-level income and MRSA infection risk in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22275-5
Sarah Blackmon, Esther E Avendano, Sweta Balaji, Samson Alemu Argaw, Rebecca A Morin, Nanguneri Nirmala, Shira Doron, Maya L Nadimpalli
{"title":"Neighborhood-level income and MRSA infection risk in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sarah Blackmon, Esther E Avendano, Sweta Balaji, Samson Alemu Argaw, Rebecca A Morin, Nanguneri Nirmala, Shira Doron, Maya L Nadimpalli","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-22275-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of neighborhood-level income on community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) risk remains poorly understood, despite established associations between MRSA risk and the social determinants of health. There are conflicting findings in the existing literature and no known systematic reviews based in the U.S. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between neighborhood-level income and CA-MRSA in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley), and Web of Science Core Collection from 2017 to 10 January 2021. An updated search was completed in November 2023. Eligible studies reported stratified CA-MRSA case counts and/or effect measures by neighborhood income level, reported as a categorical or continuous variable. Relevant data were extracted using Covidence following the PRISMA guidelines. A random-effects model meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect measure. Three study design-specific risk of bias assessments and a quality assessment were applied using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and GRADE approach, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six publications met eligibility criteria. Five found that living in a low-income neighborhood was associated with increased CA-MRSA risk. Among the four studies eligible for the meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio for CA-MRSA infection among low vs. high-income neighborhoods (reference group) was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.46), with statistical heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> 73%). Limiting to low risk of bias studies (n = 3), there was no significant relationship between low income and CA-MRSA infection (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33) with heterogeneity of 0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence supports an association between lower neighborhood income and higher CA-MRSA infection risk, albeit with considerable heterogeneity. Future studies should consider evaluating neighborhood-level income as a continuous variable, and at the block-group level to avoid exposure misclassification. Furthermore, researchers should consider adjusting for covariates that could allow for a causal interpretation of the relationship between low neighborhood-level income and CA-MRSA risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1074"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22275-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of neighborhood-level income on community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) risk remains poorly understood, despite established associations between MRSA risk and the social determinants of health. There are conflicting findings in the existing literature and no known systematic reviews based in the U.S. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between neighborhood-level income and CA-MRSA in the U.S.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Daily (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Wiley), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley), and Web of Science Core Collection from 2017 to 10 January 2021. An updated search was completed in November 2023. Eligible studies reported stratified CA-MRSA case counts and/or effect measures by neighborhood income level, reported as a categorical or continuous variable. Relevant data were extracted using Covidence following the PRISMA guidelines. A random-effects model meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled effect measure. Three study design-specific risk of bias assessments and a quality assessment were applied using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and GRADE approach, respectively.

Results: Six publications met eligibility criteria. Five found that living in a low-income neighborhood was associated with increased CA-MRSA risk. Among the four studies eligible for the meta-analysis, the pooled odds ratio for CA-MRSA infection among low vs. high-income neighborhoods (reference group) was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.46), with statistical heterogeneity (I2 73%). Limiting to low risk of bias studies (n = 3), there was no significant relationship between low income and CA-MRSA infection (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33) with heterogeneity of 0%.

Conclusions: Evidence supports an association between lower neighborhood income and higher CA-MRSA infection risk, albeit with considerable heterogeneity. Future studies should consider evaluating neighborhood-level income as a continuous variable, and at the block-group level to avoid exposure misclassification. Furthermore, researchers should consider adjusting for covariates that could allow for a causal interpretation of the relationship between low neighborhood-level income and CA-MRSA risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国邻里收入与 MRSA 感染风险:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
背景:社区收入对社区相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)风险的影响仍然知之甚少,尽管MRSA风险与健康的社会决定因素之间存在既定关联。在现有文献中有相互矛盾的发现,并且没有基于美国的已知系统评价。我们的目标是对美国社区水平收入与CA-MRSA之间的关系进行系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了MEDLINE (Ovid)、MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print、In-Process、In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed citation、Daily (Ovid)、Global Health (Ovid)、Embase (Elsevier)、Cochrane system Reviews Database (Wiley)、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley)和Web of Science核心Collection,检索时间为2017年至2021年1月10日。更新的搜索于2023年11月完成。符合条件的研究报告了分层CA-MRSA病例数和/或邻里收入水平的效果测量,报告为分类或连续变量。按照PRISMA指南使用covid - ence提取相关数据。随机效应模型荟萃分析用于估计合并效应测量。三个研究设计特异性偏倚风险评估和一个质量评估分别采用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表和GRADE方法。结果:6篇出版物符合入选标准。五项研究发现,生活在低收入社区与CA-MRSA风险增加有关。在符合meta分析条件的四项研究中,低收入社区与高收入社区(参照组)CA-MRSA感染的合并优势比为1.28 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.46),具有统计学异质性(I2 73%)。限于低风险偏倚研究(n = 3),低收入与CA-MRSA感染之间无显著关系(OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.96, 1.33),异质性为0%。结论:证据支持较低的社区收入与较高的CA-MRSA感染风险之间的关联,尽管存在相当大的异质性。未来的研究应考虑将社区水平收入作为一个连续变量进行评估,并在街区-群体水平上进行评估,以避免暴露错误分类。此外,研究人员应该考虑调整协变量,以便对低邻里收入和CA-MRSA风险之间的关系进行因果解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
A study on the motivation stratification and behavioral differentiation patterns of sports socializing among Chinese residents: an empirical exploration based on latent profile analysis and random forest models. Factors associated with satisfaction with teledentistry care among patients from a rural and an urban population in Peru during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey. Interruption in physical activity behavior among Chinese adults in 2015 and 2020: trends and multilevel correlates based on two national surveys. Physical activity and sleep quality: exploring the mediating role of depression and the moderating role of physical fitness among adolescents. A quasi-experimental design study on myopia preventive intervention based on the MMHEM health promotion model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1