Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry and Risk Factors Associated with Discrepancy from Arterial Oxygenation in Asian Patients in the ICU: An Observational Study.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.006
Toshishige Takagi, Tomoko Fujii, Sae Nakamura, Yusuke Tsutsumi, Shoichi Uezono
{"title":"Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry and Risk Factors Associated with Discrepancy from Arterial Oxygenation in Asian Patients in the ICU: An Observational Study.","authors":"Toshishige Takagi, Tomoko Fujii, Sae Nakamura, Yusuke Tsutsumi, Shoichi Uezono","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oxygen administration is often guided by pulse oximeter readings. However, inaccuracies have been reported, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. During the COVID-19 pandemic, racial and ethnic disparities in hypoxemia detection emerged, with studies showing a higher incidence of hidden hypoxemia in Black and Hispanic patients. However, limited data exists regarding the Asian population.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How accurate are SpO<sub>2</sub> readings in Asian patients with critical illness, and what factors contribute to discrepancies with SaO<sub>2</sub>?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center observational study in an ICU at a tertiary care hospital in Japan, including all adult patients admitted from October 2013 through September 2021. We collected data from electronic records and analyzed for agreement between SpO2 and SaO<sub>2</sub> using modified Bland-Altman plots. We performed multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with SpO<sub>2</sub>-SaO<sub>2</sub> differences. We used cubic splines to model associations between the differences and mortality. To further explore potential mechanisms of dissociation, subgroups of patients with chronic dialysis and sepsis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical data from 10,698 patients admitted to the ICU were analyzed. The mean bias between SpO<sub>2</sub> and SaO<sub>2</sub> was -1.23%, with the largest discrepancies occurring 24.7 hours after ICU admission. Hidden hypoxemia (SaO<sub>2</sub> <88%, SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥88%) occurred in 0.8% of patients, and serious hidden hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥92%) occurred in 0.6%. Overestimation of SaO<sub>2</sub> was associated with high creatinine levels, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis, whereas underestimation was associated with sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and signs of impaired systemic perfusion. We observed a U-shaped relation between the SpO<sub>2</sub> and SaO<sub>2</sub> differences and mortality, indicating a non-linear association.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Dissociation between SpO2 and SaO2 in Asian patients in the ICU was small; however, overestimation and underestimation were associated with increased mortality risk, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis or impaired peripheral perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oxygen administration is often guided by pulse oximeter readings. However, inaccuracies have been reported, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. During the COVID-19 pandemic, racial and ethnic disparities in hypoxemia detection emerged, with studies showing a higher incidence of hidden hypoxemia in Black and Hispanic patients. However, limited data exists regarding the Asian population.

Research question: How accurate are SpO2 readings in Asian patients with critical illness, and what factors contribute to discrepancies with SaO2?

Study design and methods: We conducted a single-center observational study in an ICU at a tertiary care hospital in Japan, including all adult patients admitted from October 2013 through September 2021. We collected data from electronic records and analyzed for agreement between SpO2 and SaO2 using modified Bland-Altman plots. We performed multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with SpO2-SaO2 differences. We used cubic splines to model associations between the differences and mortality. To further explore potential mechanisms of dissociation, subgroups of patients with chronic dialysis and sepsis were analyzed.

Results: Clinical data from 10,698 patients admitted to the ICU were analyzed. The mean bias between SpO2 and SaO2 was -1.23%, with the largest discrepancies occurring 24.7 hours after ICU admission. Hidden hypoxemia (SaO2 <88%, SpO2 ≥88%) occurred in 0.8% of patients, and serious hidden hypoxemia (SpO2 ≥92%) occurred in 0.6%. Overestimation of SaO2 was associated with high creatinine levels, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis, whereas underestimation was associated with sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and signs of impaired systemic perfusion. We observed a U-shaped relation between the SpO2 and SaO2 differences and mortality, indicating a non-linear association.

Interpretation: Dissociation between SpO2 and SaO2 in Asian patients in the ICU was small; however, overestimation and underestimation were associated with increased mortality risk, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis or impaired peripheral perfusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室亚裔患者脉搏氧饱和度的准确性以及与动脉氧饱和度不一致相关的风险因素:一项观察性研究。
背景:给氧通常以脉搏血氧仪读数为指导。然而,也有报道称存在误差,尤其是肤色较深的患者。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,低氧血症检测中出现了种族和民族差异,研究显示黑人和西班牙裔患者隐性低氧血症的发生率较高。然而,有关亚裔人口的数据却很有限:研究设计和方法:我们在日本一家三级医院的重症监护室开展了一项单中心观察性研究,研究对象包括 2013 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月期间收治的所有成人患者。我们从电子记录中收集了数据,并使用改良的布兰-阿尔特曼图分析了 SpO2 和 SaO2 之间的一致性。我们进行了多变量回归分析,以确定与 SpO2 和 SaO2 差异相关的因素。我们使用三次样条来模拟差异与死亡率之间的关系。为了进一步探索差异的潜在机制,我们对慢性透析和败血症患者的亚组进行了分析:分析了 10,698 名入住重症监护室患者的临床数据。SpO2和SaO2之间的平均偏差为-1.23%,最大的偏差发生在入住重症监护室24.7小时后。0.8%的患者出现隐性低氧血症(SaO2 2 ≥88%),0.6%的患者出现严重隐性低氧血症(SpO2 ≥92%)。SaO2估计过高与肌酐水平过高有关,尤其是慢性血液透析患者,而估计过低则与败血症、机械通气和全身灌注受损迹象有关。我们观察到 SpO2 和 SaO2 差异与死亡率之间呈 U 型关系,表明两者之间存在非线性关联:重症监护室亚裔患者的SpO2和SaO2之间的差异很小;但是,高估和低估与死亡风险增加有关,尤其是在长期血液透析或外周灌注受损的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
US Physicians' Perceived Impacts of Abortion Bans in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine. Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry and Risk Factors Associated with Discrepancy from Arterial Oxygenation in Asian Patients in the ICU: An Observational Study. Inhaled menthol for dyspnea relief during cycle exercise in COPD: a randomized trial. Factors Associated with No-Show Rates for Lung Cancer Screening CT Appointments. Interventions to improve adherence to clinical guidelines for the management and follow-up of pulmonary nodules: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1