Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry and Risk Factors Associated with Discrepancy from Arterial Oxygenation in Asian Patients in the ICU: An Observational Study.
{"title":"Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry and Risk Factors Associated with Discrepancy from Arterial Oxygenation in Asian Patients in the ICU: An Observational Study.","authors":"Toshishige Takagi, Tomoko Fujii, Sae Nakamura, Yusuke Tsutsumi, Shoichi Uezono","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oxygen administration is often guided by pulse oximeter readings. However, inaccuracies have been reported, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. During the COVID-19 pandemic, racial and ethnic disparities in hypoxemia detection emerged, with studies showing a higher incidence of hidden hypoxemia in Black and Hispanic patients. However, limited data exists regarding the Asian population.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>How accurate are SpO<sub>2</sub> readings in Asian patients with critical illness, and what factors contribute to discrepancies with SaO<sub>2</sub>?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center observational study in an ICU at a tertiary care hospital in Japan, including all adult patients admitted from October 2013 through September 2021. We collected data from electronic records and analyzed for agreement between SpO2 and SaO<sub>2</sub> using modified Bland-Altman plots. We performed multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with SpO<sub>2</sub>-SaO<sub>2</sub> differences. We used cubic splines to model associations between the differences and mortality. To further explore potential mechanisms of dissociation, subgroups of patients with chronic dialysis and sepsis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical data from 10,698 patients admitted to the ICU were analyzed. The mean bias between SpO<sub>2</sub> and SaO<sub>2</sub> was -1.23%, with the largest discrepancies occurring 24.7 hours after ICU admission. Hidden hypoxemia (SaO<sub>2</sub> <88%, SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥88%) occurred in 0.8% of patients, and serious hidden hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> ≥92%) occurred in 0.6%. Overestimation of SaO<sub>2</sub> was associated with high creatinine levels, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis, whereas underestimation was associated with sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and signs of impaired systemic perfusion. We observed a U-shaped relation between the SpO<sub>2</sub> and SaO<sub>2</sub> differences and mortality, indicating a non-linear association.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Dissociation between SpO2 and SaO2 in Asian patients in the ICU was small; however, overestimation and underestimation were associated with increased mortality risk, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis or impaired peripheral perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Oxygen administration is often guided by pulse oximeter readings. However, inaccuracies have been reported, particularly in patients with darker skin tones. During the COVID-19 pandemic, racial and ethnic disparities in hypoxemia detection emerged, with studies showing a higher incidence of hidden hypoxemia in Black and Hispanic patients. However, limited data exists regarding the Asian population.
Research question: How accurate are SpO2 readings in Asian patients with critical illness, and what factors contribute to discrepancies with SaO2?
Study design and methods: We conducted a single-center observational study in an ICU at a tertiary care hospital in Japan, including all adult patients admitted from October 2013 through September 2021. We collected data from electronic records and analyzed for agreement between SpO2 and SaO2 using modified Bland-Altman plots. We performed multivariable regression analysis to identify factors associated with SpO2-SaO2 differences. We used cubic splines to model associations between the differences and mortality. To further explore potential mechanisms of dissociation, subgroups of patients with chronic dialysis and sepsis were analyzed.
Results: Clinical data from 10,698 patients admitted to the ICU were analyzed. The mean bias between SpO2 and SaO2 was -1.23%, with the largest discrepancies occurring 24.7 hours after ICU admission. Hidden hypoxemia (SaO2 <88%, SpO2 ≥88%) occurred in 0.8% of patients, and serious hidden hypoxemia (SpO2 ≥92%) occurred in 0.6%. Overestimation of SaO2 was associated with high creatinine levels, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis, whereas underestimation was associated with sepsis, mechanical ventilation, and signs of impaired systemic perfusion. We observed a U-shaped relation between the SpO2 and SaO2 differences and mortality, indicating a non-linear association.
Interpretation: Dissociation between SpO2 and SaO2 in Asian patients in the ICU was small; however, overestimation and underestimation were associated with increased mortality risk, particularly among patients with chronic hemodialysis or impaired peripheral perfusion.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.