"Assessing Impact of Hinge Flexibility on Predicted Second Osmotic Virial Coefficients".

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064
Terrance Shoemaker, Brendan R Amer, Vladimir Razinkov, Joon Huh, Yangjie Wei, Wei Qi, Christopher J Roberts
{"title":"\"Assessing Impact of Hinge Flexibility on Predicted Second Osmotic Virial Coefficients\".","authors":"Terrance Shoemaker, Brendan R Amer, Vladimir Razinkov, Joon Huh, Yangjie Wei, Wei Qi, Christopher J Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are a key modality for treating a range of diseases because of their unique biophysical properties, such as high binding affinity and high specificity. However, MAb solutions can have unpredictable behavior that is detrimental to the drug product including aggregation and self-association, and high viscosity at elevated protein concentrations. Coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations provide an opportunity to probe antibody behavior and self-interactions early in development without large experimental or computational burden. Recent work used a 1-bead-per-charge with 1-bead-per-domain (1bC/D) to model a combination of screened electrostatic, steric, and short-ranged non-electrostatic interactions to accurately predict experimental protein self-interactions for MAbs but neglected the influence of MAb hinge flexibility. This work includes the effects of flexibility of the hinge region while maintaining the 1bC/D resolution and computational efficiency. The flexibility is modeled by intramolecular rotations and flexing of antibody fragments about the central hinge to capture literature results for the distribution of internal structures for a single MAb. The difference between flexible and rigid models are analyzed for two body interactions for a reasonably large data set (n = 63) of different MAbs at typical commercial solution conditions. The net behavior showed small differences for the flexible vs. rigid model for most MAbs, within the range of experimental results, with a small number of exceptions. While the overall MAb-MAb self-interactions were not largely dependent on intramolecular degrees of freedom of the hinge region, there were some predicted differences in particular amino acid pairwise interactions from flexible to rigid models, which may indicate the additional computational burden of including hinge flexibility would be useful for future work focused on protein design and extensions to high protein concentration drug development where there are multi-protein spatial correlations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12018,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"107064"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2025.107064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are a key modality for treating a range of diseases because of their unique biophysical properties, such as high binding affinity and high specificity. However, MAb solutions can have unpredictable behavior that is detrimental to the drug product including aggregation and self-association, and high viscosity at elevated protein concentrations. Coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations provide an opportunity to probe antibody behavior and self-interactions early in development without large experimental or computational burden. Recent work used a 1-bead-per-charge with 1-bead-per-domain (1bC/D) to model a combination of screened electrostatic, steric, and short-ranged non-electrostatic interactions to accurately predict experimental protein self-interactions for MAbs but neglected the influence of MAb hinge flexibility. This work includes the effects of flexibility of the hinge region while maintaining the 1bC/D resolution and computational efficiency. The flexibility is modeled by intramolecular rotations and flexing of antibody fragments about the central hinge to capture literature results for the distribution of internal structures for a single MAb. The difference between flexible and rigid models are analyzed for two body interactions for a reasonably large data set (n = 63) of different MAbs at typical commercial solution conditions. The net behavior showed small differences for the flexible vs. rigid model for most MAbs, within the range of experimental results, with a small number of exceptions. While the overall MAb-MAb self-interactions were not largely dependent on intramolecular degrees of freedom of the hinge region, there were some predicted differences in particular amino acid pairwise interactions from flexible to rigid models, which may indicate the additional computational burden of including hinge flexibility would be useful for future work focused on protein design and extensions to high protein concentration drug development where there are multi-protein spatial correlations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
248
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research articles, review articles and scientific commentaries on all aspects of the pharmaceutical sciences with emphasis on conceptual novelty and scientific quality. The Editors welcome articles in this multidisciplinary field, with a focus on topics relevant for drug discovery and development. More specifically, the Journal publishes reports on medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, drug delivery (including gene delivery), drug targeting, pharmaceutical technology, pharmaceutical biotechnology and clinical drug evaluation. The journal will typically not give priority to manuscripts focusing primarily on organic synthesis, natural products, adaptation of analytical approaches, or discussions pertaining to drug policy making. Scientific commentaries and review articles are generally by invitation only or by consent of the Editors. Proceedings of scientific meetings may be published as special issues or supplements to the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board "Assessing Impact of Hinge Flexibility on Predicted Second Osmotic Virial Coefficients". Fluorescent Tools for Imaging Class A G-protein Coupled Receptors. In vitro identification of decreased function genetic variants of ABCB1. Overcoming barriers in formulating practically insoluble loteprednol etabonate in ophthalmic nanoemulsion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1