Non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis following knee joint replacement: A systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Clinical Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1177/02692155251325624
Michelle C Hall, Benjamin Smith, Katie J Sheehan, Stefanny Guerra, Bushra Abdunour, Melanie Narayanasamy, Joanne Stocks, Fiona Moffatt, Catherine Sackley
{"title":"Non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis following knee joint replacement: A systematic review.","authors":"Michelle C Hall, Benjamin Smith, Katie J Sheehan, Stefanny Guerra, Bushra Abdunour, Melanie Narayanasamy, Joanne Stocks, Fiona Moffatt, Catherine Sackley","doi":"10.1177/02692155251325624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for knee stiffness or arthrofibrosis following knee replacement surgery.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)were searched from database inception to October 2024.Review methodsAll studies of non-surgical interventions (versus any/no comparator) for adults who developed knee stiffness or a diagnosis of arthrofibrosis following knee replacement were included. Selection, quality appraisal and extraction were completed in duplicate. Results were synthesised narratively. The risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE criteria were used to evaluate evidence quality.ResultsSixteen studies were included, comprising two randomised-controlled trials (n = 76), one non-randomised controlled trial (n = 35), seven cohort studies (n = 352) and six case studies (n = seven). Interventions varied widely including exercise, manual therapy, mechanical devices, and education. Improvements in knee range of movement were reported with some demonstrating functional gains >110° of knee flexion, but the evidence was of low quality. Limited reporting of intervention descriptions, patient-relevant outcomes including function and pain, and longer-term follow-up hindered comprehensive evaluation.ConclusionThe review highlights the heterogeneity of interventions, emphasising the need for standardised reporting. While some studies showed promise, the lack of control groups, small sample sizes, and varied follow-up durations limit conclusive findings. There is insufficient evidence to support any specific non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis post-arthroplasty. Further research should be a priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251325624"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251325624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for knee stiffness or arthrofibrosis following knee replacement surgery.Data sourcesOvid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)were searched from database inception to October 2024.Review methodsAll studies of non-surgical interventions (versus any/no comparator) for adults who developed knee stiffness or a diagnosis of arthrofibrosis following knee replacement were included. Selection, quality appraisal and extraction were completed in duplicate. Results were synthesised narratively. The risk of bias was assessed, and GRADE criteria were used to evaluate evidence quality.ResultsSixteen studies were included, comprising two randomised-controlled trials (n = 76), one non-randomised controlled trial (n = 35), seven cohort studies (n = 352) and six case studies (n = seven). Interventions varied widely including exercise, manual therapy, mechanical devices, and education. Improvements in knee range of movement were reported with some demonstrating functional gains >110° of knee flexion, but the evidence was of low quality. Limited reporting of intervention descriptions, patient-relevant outcomes including function and pain, and longer-term follow-up hindered comprehensive evaluation.ConclusionThe review highlights the heterogeneity of interventions, emphasising the need for standardised reporting. While some studies showed promise, the lack of control groups, small sample sizes, and varied follow-up durations limit conclusive findings. There is insufficient evidence to support any specific non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis post-arthroplasty. Further research should be a priority.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
Non-surgical interventions for arthrofibrosis following knee joint replacement: A systematic review. Understanding the activity and participation limitations in adolescents with cleft lip and palate: A mixed design study using the concept of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Children and Youth Version. Exploring the experience of people with shoulder osteoarthritis and their perceptions of non-surgical management: A qualitative study. Group versus individual delivery of upper limb intervention for adults post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Response letter: The only defendable scientific position: A strong case against radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy for insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1