Redefining macrophage phenotypes after spinal cord injury: An open data approach.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Neurology Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115222
Fernanda Stapenhorst Franca, John C Gensel
{"title":"Redefining macrophage phenotypes after spinal cord injury: An open data approach.","authors":"Fernanda Stapenhorst Franca, John C Gensel","doi":"10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers intraspinal inflammation through an influx of blood-derived inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and monocyte-derived macrophages. Macrophages play a complex role in SCI pathophysiology ranging from potentiating secondary injury to facilitating recovery and wound healing. In vitro, macrophages have been classified as having a pro-inflammatory, M1 phenotype, or a regenerative, M2 phenotype. In vivo, however, studies suggest that macrophages exist in a spectrum of phenotypes and can shift from one phenotype to another. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) allows us to assess immune cell heterogeneity in the spinal cord after injury, and several groups have created publicly available datasets containing valuable data for further exploration. In this study, we compared three different scRNA-seq datasets and analyzed macrophage heterogeneity after SCI based on cell clustering according to gene expression profiles. We analyzed data from 7 days post injury (dpi) in young female mice that received a mid-thoracic SCI contusion. Using the Seurat pipeline, we clustered cells, subsetted macrophages from microglia and other myeloid cells, and identified different macrophage populations. Using SingleR as a cross-dataset cluster comparison tool, we identified similarities in macrophage populations across datasets. To confirm and refine this analysis, we analyzed the top 10 differentially expressed genes for each population in each dataset. Most clusters identified in the SingleR analysis were confirmed to have a unique genetic signature and were consistently present in all datasets analyzed. Taken together, four distinct macrophage populations were consistently identified after SCI at 7 dpi in three datasets from independent research teams. Our identification of biologically conserved macrophage populations after SCI using an unbiased approach highlights the power of data sharing and open data in redefining macrophage heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12246,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"115222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) triggers intraspinal inflammation through an influx of blood-derived inflammatory cells such as neutrophils and monocyte-derived macrophages. Macrophages play a complex role in SCI pathophysiology ranging from potentiating secondary injury to facilitating recovery and wound healing. In vitro, macrophages have been classified as having a pro-inflammatory, M1 phenotype, or a regenerative, M2 phenotype. In vivo, however, studies suggest that macrophages exist in a spectrum of phenotypes and can shift from one phenotype to another. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) allows us to assess immune cell heterogeneity in the spinal cord after injury, and several groups have created publicly available datasets containing valuable data for further exploration. In this study, we compared three different scRNA-seq datasets and analyzed macrophage heterogeneity after SCI based on cell clustering according to gene expression profiles. We analyzed data from 7 days post injury (dpi) in young female mice that received a mid-thoracic SCI contusion. Using the Seurat pipeline, we clustered cells, subsetted macrophages from microglia and other myeloid cells, and identified different macrophage populations. Using SingleR as a cross-dataset cluster comparison tool, we identified similarities in macrophage populations across datasets. To confirm and refine this analysis, we analyzed the top 10 differentially expressed genes for each population in each dataset. Most clusters identified in the SingleR analysis were confirmed to have a unique genetic signature and were consistently present in all datasets analyzed. Taken together, four distinct macrophage populations were consistently identified after SCI at 7 dpi in three datasets from independent research teams. Our identification of biologically conserved macrophage populations after SCI using an unbiased approach highlights the power of data sharing and open data in redefining macrophage heterogeneity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Neurology
Experimental Neurology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
258
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Experimental Neurology, a Journal of Neuroscience Research, publishes original research in neuroscience with a particular emphasis on novel findings in neural development, regeneration, plasticity and transplantation. The journal has focused on research concerning basic mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Lack of effects of Resolvin D1 after spinal cord injury in mice Impact of long-term deltamethrin exposure on Alzheimer's-related neurodegeneration in rats Promotion of remyelination by a thyromimetic drug leading to functional recovery. Neural stem cell-derived exosomes improve neurite outgrowth and cognitive function through transferring miR-132-3p Redefining macrophage phenotypes after spinal cord injury: An open data approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1