Skilled Nursing Facility Utilization Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105551
Meiling Ying, Zijing Cheng, Richard A Hirth, Brent K Hollenbeck, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Vahakn B Shahinian, Yue Li
{"title":"Skilled Nursing Facility Utilization Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Meiling Ying, Zijing Cheng, Richard A Hirth, Brent K Hollenbeck, Karen E Joynt Maddox, Vahakn B Shahinian, Yue Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the association between skilled nursing facility (SNF) utilization and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>The study included community-dwelling respondents aged 65 or older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from 3 waves of the Health and Retirement Study and employed multivariable, individual-level regressions. The primary outcomes were any SNF stays, the number of SNF stays, and the total number of SNF days, in the past 2 years of the survey. Respondents were classified as cognitively normal, having cognitive impairment but not dementia (CIND), or having ADRD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 23,654 respondent-years, representing 12,529 unique respondents. Before the pandemic, differences in any SNF stays, and the number of SNF stays between the cognitively normal and CIND and ADRD groups were statistically insignificant in multivariable regressions. During the pandemic, compared with respondents with normal cognition, those with CIND had higher odds of any SNF stays (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.06-2.20) and more SNF stays (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.30-4.40); similarly, the ADRD group showed higher odds of any SNF stays (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59) and more SNF stays (IRR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.36-4.47) than cognitively normal older adults. The total number of SNF days for CIND and ADRD respondents remained statistically insignificantly different from those of the cognitively normal group, both before and during the pandemic, in regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This cohort study suggests that the pandemic was associated with increased differences in any SNF stays and number of transitions to SNFs between cognitively normal individuals and those with CIND or ADRD. These findings provide a foundation for understanding the potential impact of a public health emergency on post-acute care utilization among older adults with varying degrees of cognitive impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105551"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the association between skilled nursing facility (SNF) utilization and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: An observational cohort study.

Setting and participants: The study included community-dwelling respondents aged 65 or older.

Methods: This study analyzed data from 3 waves of the Health and Retirement Study and employed multivariable, individual-level regressions. The primary outcomes were any SNF stays, the number of SNF stays, and the total number of SNF days, in the past 2 years of the survey. Respondents were classified as cognitively normal, having cognitive impairment but not dementia (CIND), or having ADRD.

Results: The study included 23,654 respondent-years, representing 12,529 unique respondents. Before the pandemic, differences in any SNF stays, and the number of SNF stays between the cognitively normal and CIND and ADRD groups were statistically insignificant in multivariable regressions. During the pandemic, compared with respondents with normal cognition, those with CIND had higher odds of any SNF stays (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.06-2.20) and more SNF stays (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.30-4.40); similarly, the ADRD group showed higher odds of any SNF stays (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.08-2.59) and more SNF stays (IRR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.36-4.47) than cognitively normal older adults. The total number of SNF days for CIND and ADRD respondents remained statistically insignificantly different from those of the cognitively normal group, both before and during the pandemic, in regression analyses.

Conclusions and implications: This cohort study suggests that the pandemic was associated with increased differences in any SNF stays and number of transitions to SNFs between cognitively normal individuals and those with CIND or ADRD. These findings provide a foundation for understanding the potential impact of a public health emergency on post-acute care utilization among older adults with varying degrees of cognitive impairment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Using Machine Learning to Identify Social Determinants of Health that Impact Discharge Disposition for Hospitalized Patients. Identifying Patient, Care Partner, and Clinician Needs for Functional Recovery Following Hospitalization When Dementia is Present. Sex-Specific Fall Trajectories and Associated Self-Reported Risk Factors: A Prospective Analysis of the 3-Year 5-Country DO-HEALTH Trial. Factors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Consumer-Directed Personal Care in the New York Metropolitan Area: Trends in Use From 2017 to 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1