Enhancing external cephalic version success: insights from an Israeli tertiary center.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1515/jpm-2024-0546
Nicolas Andre, Ayat Abu Hamad, Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia, Yael Baumfeld, Eyal Sheiner, Eli H Bernstein, Offer Erez, Giuseppe Trojano, Polina Schwarzman
{"title":"Enhancing external cephalic version success: insights from an Israeli tertiary center.","authors":"Nicolas Andre, Ayat Abu Hamad, Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia, Yael Baumfeld, Eyal Sheiner, Eli H Bernstein, Offer Erez, Giuseppe Trojano, Polina Schwarzman","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>With global cesarean delivery rates steadily rising, a more accessible and widely adopted approach to external cephalic version for breech presentations is essential. This study seeks to clarify controversial factors associated with the procedure's success and highlight the favorable fetal-maternal outcomes post-procedure to support its broader, guideline-based application where indicated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study was conducted over 7 years at Soroka University Medical Center, including healthy pregnant women with breech fetal presentation at a minimum of 36 weeks. The procedure was performed by experienced obstetricians with over 10 years of expertise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 262 women who underwent the procedure, a 60 % success rate was achieved. Success was associated with factors such as parity and higher fetal weight, while BMI and placental location did not impact outcomes. Successful procedures were linked to increased rates of vaginal birth (p<0.001), longer gestational age at delivery (p<0.001), and higher birth weight (p<0.02) compared to failed versions. No significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes were noted during or after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>External cephalic version is a safe and effective method for reducing the rate of cesarean deliveries. Additionally, babies born after the procedure tend to have a higher gestational age and birth weight. We recommend factoring physician experience into predictive models and advocate for the widespread inclusion of simulation-based training in residency programs to enhance obstetricians' confidence and skills worldwide, promoting its broader use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: With global cesarean delivery rates steadily rising, a more accessible and widely adopted approach to external cephalic version for breech presentations is essential. This study seeks to clarify controversial factors associated with the procedure's success and highlight the favorable fetal-maternal outcomes post-procedure to support its broader, guideline-based application where indicated.

Methods: This observational study was conducted over 7 years at Soroka University Medical Center, including healthy pregnant women with breech fetal presentation at a minimum of 36 weeks. The procedure was performed by experienced obstetricians with over 10 years of expertise.

Results: Out of 262 women who underwent the procedure, a 60 % success rate was achieved. Success was associated with factors such as parity and higher fetal weight, while BMI and placental location did not impact outcomes. Successful procedures were linked to increased rates of vaginal birth (p<0.001), longer gestational age at delivery (p<0.001), and higher birth weight (p<0.02) compared to failed versions. No significant adverse maternal or fetal outcomes were noted during or after the procedure.

Conclusions: External cephalic version is a safe and effective method for reducing the rate of cesarean deliveries. Additionally, babies born after the procedure tend to have a higher gestational age and birth weight. We recommend factoring physician experience into predictive models and advocate for the widespread inclusion of simulation-based training in residency programs to enhance obstetricians' confidence and skills worldwide, promoting its broader use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing external cephalic version success: insights from an Israeli tertiary center. Maternity staff views on implementing a national perinatal mortality review tool: understanding barriers and facilitators. Trends in gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes in the United States. Prenatal care for twin pregnancies: analysis of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Severe maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies: the impact of body mass index and gestational weight gain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1