The role of uric acid in Parkinson's disease: a UK brain bank pathology-validated case-control study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s10072-025-08112-y
Lazzaro di Biase, Pasquale Maria Pecoraro, Simona Paola Carbone, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
{"title":"The role of uric acid in Parkinson's disease: a UK brain bank pathology-validated case-control study.","authors":"Lazzaro di Biase, Pasquale Maria Pecoraro, Simona Paola Carbone, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08112-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Uric acid has been supposed to have a protective role in Parkinson's disease with controversial findings. This relationship has not been validated with pathology-confirmed diagnoses. This study aims to compare uric acid levels between pathology-confirmed and clinically-misdiagnosed Parkinson's disease patients over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>65 patients with an in-vivo clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease were enrolled from the UK Brain Bank. 33 were confirmed with post-mortem pathology analysis, while 32 were clinically misdiagnosed patients. Chart review explored uric acid levels at two timepoints (NO and N1). A repeated-measures ANOVA evaluated uric acid level variation over time and determined differences between the groups, including timespan between samples, disease duration, age at death, age of onset and sex as covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average uric acid levels at N0 were 5.83 mg/dl (SD ± 1.99) and 5.94 mg/dl (SD ± 1.87) for respectively true and false positives. At N1, the values were 7.61 mg/dl (SD ± 2.35) and 7.36 mg/dl (SD ± 2.86) for respectively true and false positives. A significant main effect of time on uric acid levels was found (F(1, 58) = 4.303, p = 0.042, η<sup>2</sup>_p = 0.069). The interaction between time and the covariates was not significant, suggesting that these variables did not influence uric acid level variation over time. No influence of the diagnostic confirmation and covariates on uric acid levels between groups was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While uric acid levels increase over time in Parkinson's disease patients, this increase does not differ significantly between those with confirmed and unconfirmed diagnoses, nor it is influenced by disease duration, age at death, age of onset or sex.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3117-3126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08112-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Uric acid has been supposed to have a protective role in Parkinson's disease with controversial findings. This relationship has not been validated with pathology-confirmed diagnoses. This study aims to compare uric acid levels between pathology-confirmed and clinically-misdiagnosed Parkinson's disease patients over time.

Methods: 65 patients with an in-vivo clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease were enrolled from the UK Brain Bank. 33 were confirmed with post-mortem pathology analysis, while 32 were clinically misdiagnosed patients. Chart review explored uric acid levels at two timepoints (NO and N1). A repeated-measures ANOVA evaluated uric acid level variation over time and determined differences between the groups, including timespan between samples, disease duration, age at death, age of onset and sex as covariates.

Results: Average uric acid levels at N0 were 5.83 mg/dl (SD ± 1.99) and 5.94 mg/dl (SD ± 1.87) for respectively true and false positives. At N1, the values were 7.61 mg/dl (SD ± 2.35) and 7.36 mg/dl (SD ± 2.86) for respectively true and false positives. A significant main effect of time on uric acid levels was found (F(1, 58) = 4.303, p = 0.042, η2_p = 0.069). The interaction between time and the covariates was not significant, suggesting that these variables did not influence uric acid level variation over time. No influence of the diagnostic confirmation and covariates on uric acid levels between groups was found.

Conclusion: While uric acid levels increase over time in Parkinson's disease patients, this increase does not differ significantly between those with confirmed and unconfirmed diagnoses, nor it is influenced by disease duration, age at death, age of onset or sex.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿酸在帕金森病中的作用:英国脑库病理学验证病例对照研究。
尿酸一直被认为对帕金森病有保护作用,但有争议的发现。这种关系尚未被病理证实的诊断所证实。本研究旨在比较病理确诊和临床误诊帕金森病患者尿酸水平随时间的变化。方法:从英国脑库(UK Brain Bank)收集65例临床诊断为帕金森病的患者,经尸检病理证实33例,临床误诊32例。图表回顾探讨了两个时间点(NO和N1)的尿酸水平。重复测量方差分析评估尿酸水平随时间的变化,并确定组间差异,包括样本间的时间跨度、疾病持续时间、死亡年龄、发病年龄和性别作为协变量。结果:N0时的平均尿酸水平真阳性为5.83 mg/dl (SD±1.99),假阳性为5.94 mg/dl (SD±1.87)。N1时,真阳性和假阳性分别为7.61 mg/dl (SD±2.35)和7.36 mg/dl (SD±2.86)。时间对尿酸水平有显著的主要影响(F(1,58) = 4.303, p = 0.042, η2_p = 0.069)。时间和协变量之间的相互作用不显著,表明这些变量不影响尿酸水平随时间的变化。没有发现诊断确认和协变量对组间尿酸水平的影响。结论:虽然帕金森病患者的尿酸水平随着时间的推移而升高,但在确诊和未确诊的帕金森病患者中,尿酸水平的升高没有显著差异,也不受疾病持续时间、死亡年龄、发病年龄或性别的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Repetitive nerve stimulation findings in iatrogenic botulism compared with myasthenia gravis. Exploring perceived gender disparities in neurology career: insights from an Italian survey. A novel case of compound heterozygous GFPT1 congenital myasthenic syndrome with a coexisting heterozygous DYSF mutation: clinical and pathological insights. The role of exercise and lifestyle factors in fatigue among Parkinson's disease patients: a cross-sectional study. Sex-related differences in the short and long-term outcome of internal pallidus stimulation for dystonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1