Intuitive physical reasoning is not mediated by linguistic nor exclusively domain-general abstract representations

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Neuropsychologia Pub Date : 2025-07-04 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109125
Hope H. Kean , Alexander Fung , R.T. Pramod , Jessica Chomik-Morales , Nancy Kanwisher , Evelina Fedorenko
{"title":"Intuitive physical reasoning is not mediated by linguistic nor exclusively domain-general abstract representations","authors":"Hope H. Kean ,&nbsp;Alexander Fung ,&nbsp;R.T. Pramod ,&nbsp;Jessica Chomik-Morales ,&nbsp;Nancy Kanwisher ,&nbsp;Evelina Fedorenko","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The ability to reason about the physical world is a critical tool in the human cognitive toolbox, but the nature of the representations that mediate physical reasoning remains debated. Here, we use fMRI to illuminate this question by investigating the relationship between the physical-reasoning system and two well-characterized systems: a) the domain-general Multiple Demand (MD) system, which supports abstract reasoning, including mathematical and logical reasoning, and b) the language system, which supports linguistic computations and has been hypothesized to mediate some forms of thought. We replicate prior findings of a network of frontal and parietal areas that are robustly engaged by physical reasoning and identify an additional physical-reasoning area in the left frontal cortex, which also houses components of the MD and language systems. Critically, direct comparisons with tasks that target the MD and the language systems reveal that the physical-reasoning system overlaps with the MD system, but is dissociable from it in fine-grained activation patterns, which replicates prior work. Moreover, the physical-reasoning system does not overlap with the language system. These results suggest that physical reasoning does not rely on linguistic representations, nor exclusively on the domain-general abstract reasoning that the MD system supports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 109125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393225000600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to reason about the physical world is a critical tool in the human cognitive toolbox, but the nature of the representations that mediate physical reasoning remains debated. Here, we use fMRI to illuminate this question by investigating the relationship between the physical-reasoning system and two well-characterized systems: a) the domain-general Multiple Demand (MD) system, which supports abstract reasoning, including mathematical and logical reasoning, and b) the language system, which supports linguistic computations and has been hypothesized to mediate some forms of thought. We replicate prior findings of a network of frontal and parietal areas that are robustly engaged by physical reasoning and identify an additional physical-reasoning area in the left frontal cortex, which also houses components of the MD and language systems. Critically, direct comparisons with tasks that target the MD and the language systems reveal that the physical-reasoning system overlaps with the MD system, but is dissociable from it in fine-grained activation patterns, which replicates prior work. Moreover, the physical-reasoning system does not overlap with the language system. These results suggest that physical reasoning does not rely on linguistic representations, nor exclusively on the domain-general abstract reasoning that the MD system supports.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直观的物理推理并不以语言为中介,也不完全是一般领域的抽象表征。
对物理世界进行推理的能力是人类认知工具箱中的一个关键工具,但调解物理推理的表征的本质仍存在争议。在这里,我们使用fMRI通过研究物理推理系统和两个特征良好的系统之间的关系来阐明这个问题:a)域通用多需求(MD)系统,它支持抽象推理,包括数学和逻辑推理;b)语言系统,它支持语言计算,并被假设为调解某些形式的思维。我们重复了先前的研究结果,即前额叶和顶叶区域的网络与物理推理密切相关,并在左额叶皮层中发现了一个额外的物理推理区域,该区域也包含MD和语言系统的组成部分。关键的是,与针对MD和语言系统的任务的直接比较表明,物理推理系统与MD系统重叠,但在细粒度的激活模式中与之分离,这复制了先前的工作。此外,物理推理系统并不与语言系统重叠。这些结果表明,物理推理不依赖于语言表征,也不完全依赖于MD系统支持的领域一般抽象推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
期刊最新文献
Aphantasia and visual working memory: No direct evidence of impaired visual working memory in aphantasics, either in behavioral performance or the accuracy of a multivoxel pattern classifier Challenging dual-coding theory: Picture superiority effects persist in aphantasia Sparsity and memory constraints interact with training sequence to bias learning of associative maps Instantaneous emotion sharing: Early brain signatures of understanding expressive communicative actions An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: Conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1