Express your feelings in words when you get sick of others' pain: Effects of word labeling on pain empathy in phase-amplitude coupling.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING NeuroImage Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121161
Jiahe Sun, Wenguang He, Hongfei Ji, Jie Li, Jie Zhuang
{"title":"Express your feelings in words when you get sick of others' pain: Effects of word labeling on pain empathy in phase-amplitude coupling.","authors":"Jiahe Sun, Wenguang He, Hongfei Ji, Jie Li, Jie Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Revealing the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying pain empathy has profound implications for the understanding of social emotions and pain regulation. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms by which pain empathy modulates individual experiences, focusing on two primary questions: When individuals empathize with pain, do they attend more to the emotional content associated with pain or the nociceptive experience itself? How does lexical labeling modulate negative affect during pain empathy? In this EEG study, we employed a labeling paradigm divided into pain labeling, affect labeling and tool labeling to distinguish emotional content from the nociceptive experience of pain stimuli. We collected data from 39 participants and analyzed their EEG components and frequency-specific brain activity across the experimental conditions. Cross-frequency coupling analyses were conducted to uncover the mechanisms by which pain empathy modulates emotional responses. Our findings revealed that compared to pain labeling and tool labeling, affect labeling more effectively reduces the negative affect associated with pain empathy. This was evidenced by the decreased amplitude of the P300 component and lower theta-band activity within the prefrontal cortex, predominantly during the later stages of labeling. Additionally, affect labeling was associated with enhanced theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling, with theta phase modulation in the posterior parietal and sensorimotor cortices influencing prefrontal gamma-band activity. These results suggest that, during pain empathy, individuals allocate greater attentional and cognitive resources to the emotional aspects of pain. Thus, implicit regulation of pain empathy involves coordinated interactions across multiple brain regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":" ","pages":"121161"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revealing the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying pain empathy has profound implications for the understanding of social emotions and pain regulation. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms by which pain empathy modulates individual experiences, focusing on two primary questions: When individuals empathize with pain, do they attend more to the emotional content associated with pain or the nociceptive experience itself? How does lexical labeling modulate negative affect during pain empathy? In this EEG study, we employed a labeling paradigm divided into pain labeling, affect labeling and tool labeling to distinguish emotional content from the nociceptive experience of pain stimuli. We collected data from 39 participants and analyzed their EEG components and frequency-specific brain activity across the experimental conditions. Cross-frequency coupling analyses were conducted to uncover the mechanisms by which pain empathy modulates emotional responses. Our findings revealed that compared to pain labeling and tool labeling, affect labeling more effectively reduces the negative affect associated with pain empathy. This was evidenced by the decreased amplitude of the P300 component and lower theta-band activity within the prefrontal cortex, predominantly during the later stages of labeling. Additionally, affect labeling was associated with enhanced theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling, with theta phase modulation in the posterior parietal and sensorimotor cortices influencing prefrontal gamma-band activity. These results suggest that, during pain empathy, individuals allocate greater attentional and cognitive resources to the emotional aspects of pain. Thus, implicit regulation of pain empathy involves coordinated interactions across multiple brain regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示疼痛共情的神经生理学机制对于理解社会情绪和疼痛调节具有深远的意义。本研究旨在阐明疼痛共鸣调节个体体验的机制,主要关注两个问题:当个体对疼痛产生移情时,他们更关注的是与疼痛相关的情感内容还是痛觉体验本身?词汇标签如何调节疼痛共鸣过程中的负面情绪?在这项脑电图研究中,我们采用了一种标签范式,分为疼痛标签、情感标签和工具标签,以区分疼痛刺激的情感内容和痛觉体验。我们收集了 39 名参与者的数据,分析了他们在不同实验条件下的脑电图成分和特定频率的大脑活动。我们还进行了跨频率耦合分析,以揭示疼痛移情调节情绪反应的机制。我们的研究结果表明,与疼痛标签和工具标签相比,情感标签能更有效地减少与疼痛共情相关的负面情感。这主要表现在贴标签的后期阶段,前额叶皮层的 P300 分量振幅降低,θ 波段活动减少。此外,情感标记与θ-γ相位-振幅耦合增强有关,后顶叶和感觉运动皮层的θ相位调制影响了前额叶γ波段活动。这些结果表明,在对疼痛产生移情时,个体会将更多的注意力和认知资源分配到疼痛的情感方面。因此,疼痛移情的内隐调节涉及多个脑区的协调互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
期刊最新文献
Parsimonious EBM: generalising the event-based model of disease progression for simultaneous events. The neural representation of body orientation and emotion from biological motion. Theta oscillations between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala support dynamic representations of threat and safety: Theta Modulation of Dynamic Threat Representation. Visual sensory discrimination of threatening stimuli presenting different durations: a magnetoencephalographic and behavioral study. White matter integrity of hearing and cognitive impairments in healthy aging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1