Machine Learning Predicts 30-Day Readmission and Mortality After Surgical Resection of Head and Neck Cancer.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70100
Daniel Fu, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Andrey Filimonov, Ghayoour S Mir
{"title":"Machine Learning Predicts 30-Day Readmission and Mortality After Surgical Resection of Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Daniel Fu, Aman M Patel, Lucy Revercomb, Andrey Filimonov, Ghayoour S Mir","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a machine learning model to identify patients at high risk of 30-day mortality and hospital readmission using routinely collected health care data.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prognostic predictive modeling and retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted in 2024 using data from 2006 to 2018, with at least a 30-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The 2006 to 2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used deidentified NCDB data on 103,891 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who underwent surgical resection. Machine learning models were trained on 80% of the data, tested on the remaining 20%, and evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify key predictors for 30-day mortality and readmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 103,891 patients, 5838 (5.6%) were readmitted, and 829 (0.8%) died within 30 days. The median age was 62, 69% male, and 89% white. Predictors included demographic and clinical data from the NCDB. Five machine learning models were combined and achieved an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83) for mortality prediction and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.65-0.68) for readmission prediction. SHAP analysis identified sex and urban-rural index as key predictors of mortality and readmission, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning models can accurately predict mortality and readmission risks, offering insights into the most influential factors. With further validation, these models may enhance clinical decision-making in postsurgical care for HNSCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e70100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model to identify patients at high risk of 30-day mortality and hospital readmission using routinely collected health care data.

Study design: Prognostic predictive modeling and retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted in 2024 using data from 2006 to 2018, with at least a 30-day follow-up.

Setting: The 2006 to 2018 National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods: The study used deidentified NCDB data on 103,891 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients who underwent surgical resection. Machine learning models were trained on 80% of the data, tested on the remaining 20%, and evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to identify key predictors for 30-day mortality and readmission.

Results: Among 103,891 patients, 5838 (5.6%) were readmitted, and 829 (0.8%) died within 30 days. The median age was 62, 69% male, and 89% white. Predictors included demographic and clinical data from the NCDB. Five machine learning models were combined and achieved an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83) for mortality prediction and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.65-0.68) for readmission prediction. SHAP analysis identified sex and urban-rural index as key predictors of mortality and readmission, respectively.

Conclusion: Machine learning models can accurately predict mortality and readmission risks, offering insights into the most influential factors. With further validation, these models may enhance clinical decision-making in postsurgical care for HNSCC patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习预测头颈癌手术切除后30天再入院和死亡率。
研究目的利用日常收集的医疗数据,开发并验证一种机器学习模型,以识别30天死亡率和再入院风险较高的患者:预后预测建模和回顾性队列研究。研究于2024年进行,使用2006年至2018年的数据,至少随访30天:2006年至2018年全国癌症数据库(NCDB):研究使用了103891名接受手术切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的去身份化NCDB数据。在80%的数据上训练了机器学习模型,在其余20%的数据上进行了测试,并使用曲线下面积(AUC)和SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)分析进行了评估,以确定30天死亡率和再入院率的关键预测因素:在 103,891 名患者中,5838 人(5.6%)再次入院,829 人(0.8%)在 30 天内死亡。中位年龄为 62 岁,69% 为男性,89% 为白人。预测因素包括国家疾病分类数据库中的人口统计学和临床数据。五个机器学习模型相结合,死亡率预测的 AUC 为 0.80(95% CI:0.77-0.83),再入院预测的 AUC 为 0.67(95% CI:0.65-0.68)。SHAP分析发现,性别和城乡指数分别是预测死亡率和再入院率的关键因素:结论:机器学习模型可以准确预测死亡率和再入院风险,并提供对最有影响因素的见解。结论:机器学习模型能准确预测死亡率和再入院风险,并能深入分析最有影响的因素。通过进一步验证,这些模型可提高 HNSCC 患者术后护理的临床决策水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predicting Behavior of Cutaneous Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Transplant Recipients. Impact of Limited English Proficiency on the Presentation and Management of Vestibular Schwannomas. Age-Related Differences in Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis: A Real-World Study. Addressing Perioperative Needs in Head and Neck Cancer: Piloting a Nurse Practitioner-Led Preoperative Virtual Visit. Prognostic Determinants in De Novo Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1