{"title":"Laser Speckle Flowgraphy Can Support Intraoperative Assessment of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Blood Flow With Indocyanine Green.","authors":"Kazuhiro Tsunekawa, Daisuke Yanagisawa, Shunsuke Yuzuriha","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately evaluating cutaneous blood flow during the elevation of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap may reduce postoperative complications in breast reconstruction surgery. This study examined whether laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) could be used to help objectively identify the safe areas of DIEP flaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at Shinshu University Hospital between 2020 and 2024 were prospectively studied. During flap elevation, skin blood flow throughout the flap was measured using LSFG and compared with results obtained by indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The cohort was also divided according to the number and location of perforators, and an intergroup comparison was performed according to LSFG readings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all subjects, relative LSFG blood flow in zones 2 (89.1%) and 3 (87.9%) was comparable, whereas blood flow in zone 4 (72.8%) was significantly lower than in those areas (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). In the lateral row group, blood flow in zone 2 tended to be lower and in zone 3 tended to be higher than in the medial row group (zone 2: 82.6% versus 89.5%, zone 3: 93.6% versus 86.8%). LSFG values did not differ significantly in relation to perforator number. LSFG-determined blood flow in the stained side of the ICG-determined staining border was significantly higher than in the nonstained side (80.6% versus 71.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSFG enables objective, noninvasive evaluation of safety margins in DIEP flaps that may support ICG angiography. Safe zones may vary depending on the location of the selected perforator.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Accurately evaluating cutaneous blood flow during the elevation of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap may reduce postoperative complications in breast reconstruction surgery. This study examined whether laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) could be used to help objectively identify the safe areas of DIEP flaps.
Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at Shinshu University Hospital between 2020 and 2024 were prospectively studied. During flap elevation, skin blood flow throughout the flap was measured using LSFG and compared with results obtained by indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The cohort was also divided according to the number and location of perforators, and an intergroup comparison was performed according to LSFG readings.
Results: In all subjects, relative LSFG blood flow in zones 2 (89.1%) and 3 (87.9%) was comparable, whereas blood flow in zone 4 (72.8%) was significantly lower than in those areas (both P < 0.001). In the lateral row group, blood flow in zone 2 tended to be lower and in zone 3 tended to be higher than in the medial row group (zone 2: 82.6% versus 89.5%, zone 3: 93.6% versus 86.8%). LSFG values did not differ significantly in relation to perforator number. LSFG-determined blood flow in the stained side of the ICG-determined staining border was significantly higher than in the nonstained side (80.6% versus 71.4%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: LSFG enables objective, noninvasive evaluation of safety margins in DIEP flaps that may support ICG angiography. Safe zones may vary depending on the location of the selected perforator.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.