Laser Speckle Flowgraphy Can Support Intraoperative Assessment of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Blood Flow With Indocyanine Green.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006627
Kazuhiro Tsunekawa, Daisuke Yanagisawa, Shunsuke Yuzuriha
{"title":"Laser Speckle Flowgraphy Can Support Intraoperative Assessment of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Blood Flow With Indocyanine Green.","authors":"Kazuhiro Tsunekawa, Daisuke Yanagisawa, Shunsuke Yuzuriha","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately evaluating cutaneous blood flow during the elevation of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap may reduce postoperative complications in breast reconstruction surgery. This study examined whether laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) could be used to help objectively identify the safe areas of DIEP flaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at Shinshu University Hospital between 2020 and 2024 were prospectively studied. During flap elevation, skin blood flow throughout the flap was measured using LSFG and compared with results obtained by indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The cohort was also divided according to the number and location of perforators, and an intergroup comparison was performed according to LSFG readings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all subjects, relative LSFG blood flow in zones 2 (89.1%) and 3 (87.9%) was comparable, whereas blood flow in zone 4 (72.8%) was significantly lower than in those areas (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). In the lateral row group, blood flow in zone 2 tended to be lower and in zone 3 tended to be higher than in the medial row group (zone 2: 82.6% versus 89.5%, zone 3: 93.6% versus 86.8%). LSFG values did not differ significantly in relation to perforator number. LSFG-determined blood flow in the stained side of the ICG-determined staining border was significantly higher than in the nonstained side (80.6% versus 71.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSFG enables objective, noninvasive evaluation of safety margins in DIEP flaps that may support ICG angiography. Safe zones may vary depending on the location of the selected perforator.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 3","pages":"e6627"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurately evaluating cutaneous blood flow during the elevation of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap may reduce postoperative complications in breast reconstruction surgery. This study examined whether laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) could be used to help objectively identify the safe areas of DIEP flaps.

Methods: Forty-eight patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at Shinshu University Hospital between 2020 and 2024 were prospectively studied. During flap elevation, skin blood flow throughout the flap was measured using LSFG and compared with results obtained by indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. The cohort was also divided according to the number and location of perforators, and an intergroup comparison was performed according to LSFG readings.

Results: In all subjects, relative LSFG blood flow in zones 2 (89.1%) and 3 (87.9%) was comparable, whereas blood flow in zone 4 (72.8%) was significantly lower than in those areas (both P < 0.001). In the lateral row group, blood flow in zone 2 tended to be lower and in zone 3 tended to be higher than in the medial row group (zone 2: 82.6% versus 89.5%, zone 3: 93.6% versus 86.8%). LSFG values did not differ significantly in relation to perforator number. LSFG-determined blood flow in the stained side of the ICG-determined staining border was significantly higher than in the nonstained side (80.6% versus 71.4%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: LSFG enables objective, noninvasive evaluation of safety margins in DIEP flaps that may support ICG angiography. Safe zones may vary depending on the location of the selected perforator.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Treatment With Skin Graft or Secondary Healing for Nasal Wound Defects After Tumor Excision: A Randomized Study. Childbearing and Pregnancy Trends Among Female Plastic and Orthopedic/Trauma Surgeons in German-speaking Countries. Effect of Different Body and Hand Postures on Microsurgical Tremor. Evolution of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery and the Pursuit for Consensus on Standardized Algorithms of Care. Investigation of Cranial Bone Changes Indicative of Increased Intracranial Pressure in Diverse Phenotypes of Craniosynostosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1