[Diagnostic performance evaluation of artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic systems in cervical cytopathological examination].

Z C Ye, Y H Yang, L Xu, R G Wei, X L Ruan, P Xue, Y Jiang, Y L Qiao
{"title":"[Diagnostic performance evaluation of artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic systems in cervical cytopathological examination].","authors":"Z C Ye, Y H Yang, L Xu, R G Wei, X L Ruan, P Xue, Y Jiang, Y L Qiao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20240711-00412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic systems in cervical cytopathological examination. <b>Methods:</b> Cervical cytology slide data were retrospectively collected from four hospitals for the external validation of the developed artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system. Subsequently, prospective data collection was conducted for human-machine assisted studies. <b>Results:</b> In the retrospective study, a total of 3 162 valid samples were collected as external validation data. The system showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.890 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.878-0.902), accuracy of 0.885 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.873-0.896), sensitivity of 0.928 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.914-0.941), and specificity of 0.852 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.834-0.867). In the prospective study, 212 valid samples were collected, and five junior cytologists participated in the human-machine assisted study. Without artificial intelligence assistance, the average AUC for the five cytologists was 0.686 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.650-0.722), the accuracy was 0.699 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.671-0.727), the sensitivity was 0.653 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.599-0.703), the specificity was 0.719 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.685-0.750), the Fleiss <i>κ</i> value was 0.510, and the reading time was 223 seconds. With artificial intelligence assistance, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity increased by 0.166, 0.143, 0.225, and 0.107, respectively. Additionally, Fleiss <i>κ</i> was 0.730 and the reading time decreased by 188 seconds. All differences were statistically significant (all <i>P</i><0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis system shows excellent performance and good generalizability, significantly improving the diagnostic accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of junior cytologists. It can be an effective auxiliary tool for junior cytologists in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23968,"journal":{"name":"中华流行病学杂志","volume":"46 3","pages":"499-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华流行病学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20240711-00412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic systems in cervical cytopathological examination. Methods: Cervical cytology slide data were retrospectively collected from four hospitals for the external validation of the developed artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostic system. Subsequently, prospective data collection was conducted for human-machine assisted studies. Results: In the retrospective study, a total of 3 162 valid samples were collected as external validation data. The system showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.890 (95%CI: 0.878-0.902), accuracy of 0.885 (95%CI: 0.873-0.896), sensitivity of 0.928 (95%CI: 0.914-0.941), and specificity of 0.852 (95%CI: 0.834-0.867). In the prospective study, 212 valid samples were collected, and five junior cytologists participated in the human-machine assisted study. Without artificial intelligence assistance, the average AUC for the five cytologists was 0.686 (95%CI: 0.650-0.722), the accuracy was 0.699 (95%CI: 0.671-0.727), the sensitivity was 0.653 (95%CI: 0.599-0.703), the specificity was 0.719 (95%CI: 0.685-0.750), the Fleiss κ value was 0.510, and the reading time was 223 seconds. With artificial intelligence assistance, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity increased by 0.166, 0.143, 0.225, and 0.107, respectively. Additionally, Fleiss κ was 0.730 and the reading time decreased by 188 seconds. All differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). Conclusions: Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis system shows excellent performance and good generalizability, significantly improving the diagnostic accuracy, consistency, and efficiency of junior cytologists. It can be an effective auxiliary tool for junior cytologists in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[人工智能辅助诊断系统在宫颈细胞病理学检查中的诊断性能评估]。
目的:评价人工智能辅助诊断系统在宫颈细胞病理学检查中的诊断效果。方法:回顾性收集4家医院宫颈细胞学切片资料,对所开发的人工智能辅助诊断系统进行外部验证。随后,前瞻性数据收集进行人机辅助研究。结果:回顾性研究共收集有效样本3 162份作为外部验证资料。该系统的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.890 (95%CI: 0.878 ~ 0.902),准确度为0.885 (95%CI: 0.873 ~ 0.896),灵敏度为0.928 (95%CI: 0.914 ~ 0.941),特异性为0.852 (95%CI: 0.834 ~ 0.867)。在前瞻性研究中,收集了212份有效样本,并有5名初级细胞学家参与了人机辅助研究。在无人工智能辅助的情况下,5位细胞学家的平均AUC为0.686 (95%CI: 0.650-0.722),准确率为0.699 (95%CI: 0.671-0.727),灵敏度为0.653 (95%CI: 0.599-0.703),特异性为0.719 (95%CI: 0.685-0.750), Fleiss κ值为0.510,读取时间为223秒。在人工智能辅助下,AUC、准确度、灵敏度和特异性分别提高了0.166、0.143、0.225和0.107。此外,Fleiss κ为0.730,阅读时间缩短188秒。结论:人工智能辅助诊断系统具有优异的性能和良好的通用性,可显著提高初级细胞学家的诊断准确性、一致性和效率。它可以成为初级细胞学家在临床实践中有效的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华流行病学杂志
中华流行病学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8981
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1981, is an advanced academic periodical in epidemiology and related disciplines in China, which, according to the principle of integrating theory with practice, mainly reports the major progress in epidemiological research. The columns of the journal include commentary, expert forum, original article, field investigation, disease surveillance, laboratory research, clinical epidemiology, basic theory or method and review, etc.  The journal is included by more than ten major biomedical databases and index systems worldwide, such as been indexed in Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Europe PubMed Central, Embase, Chemical Abstract, Chinese Science and Technology Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese core journal essentials overview, Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) core database, Chinese Biological Medical Disc (CBMdisc), and Chinese Medical Citation Index (CMCI), etc. It is one of the core academic journals and carefully selected core journals in preventive and basic medicine in China.
期刊最新文献
[A nested case-control study on the impact of hepatitis B virus infection in men on in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes]. [Analysis of mpox cases co-infected with HIV in Zhejiang Province]. [Analysis of the referral time difference and related factors from newly confirmed HIV-infected cases to antiretroviral treatment in 10 cities of Shandong Province]. [Analysis of regional differences in the indirect economic burden of cancer in populations in China, 2020]. [Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in the population of Baoding City in 2023].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1