[Comparison of clinical outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and Mckeown esophagectomy for middle or lower esophageal cancer].

L G Yuan, Y S Mao
{"title":"[Comparison of clinical outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and Mckeown esophagectomy for middle or lower esophageal cancer].","authors":"L G Yuan, Y S Mao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230713-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the short-term and long-term clinical effects of Ivor-Lewis and Mckeown esophagectomy in the treatment of middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical data of 716 patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical resection of Ivor Lewis or McKeown esophageal cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science from March 2015 to October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and the perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and survival of the two surgical methods were compared. <b>Results:</b> Among 716 patients, 135 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and 581 patients underwent McKeown esophagectomy. Mckeown group was significantly superior to Ivor Lewis group in terms of total number of lymph node dissection [median number was 27 (19~37) vs 25(18~33)], total number of lymph node dissection stations [median number was 5(4~7) vs 5(4~5)], and number of lymph nodes dissection along recurrent laryngeal nerve [median number was 3 (1~6) vs 0 (0~3), <i>P</i><0.05]. However, the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in Mckeown group was significantly higher than that in Ivor Lewis group [10.7% (62/581) vs 1.5%(2/135), <i>P</i><0.001]. There was no significant difference in the 1 -, 3 -, 5-year overall survival between the Ivor Lewis group(91.0%, 70.5%, 52.9%) and the Mckeown group (89.7%, 68.4%, 62.4%, <i>P</i>>0.05), and there was also no significant difference in the 1 -, 3 -, 5-year disease free survival between the Ivor Lewis group(77.0%, 54.1%, 44.0%) and the Mckeown group (78.3%, 59.0%, 52.8%, <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and Mckeown esophagectomy are feasible, safe, good short-term efficacy and similar survival rate for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Ivor Lewis surgery has lower incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Mckeown operation has more advantages in lymph node dissection, especially in lymph node dissection beside the recurrent laryngeal nerve.</p>","PeriodicalId":39868,"journal":{"name":"中华肿瘤杂志","volume":"47 3","pages":"262-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华肿瘤杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230713-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short-term and long-term clinical effects of Ivor-Lewis and Mckeown esophagectomy in the treatment of middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Methods: The clinical data of 716 patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent radical resection of Ivor Lewis or McKeown esophageal cancer in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science from March 2015 to October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and the perioperative indicators, postoperative complications and survival of the two surgical methods were compared. Results: Among 716 patients, 135 patients underwent Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and 581 patients underwent McKeown esophagectomy. Mckeown group was significantly superior to Ivor Lewis group in terms of total number of lymph node dissection [median number was 27 (19~37) vs 25(18~33)], total number of lymph node dissection stations [median number was 5(4~7) vs 5(4~5)], and number of lymph nodes dissection along recurrent laryngeal nerve [median number was 3 (1~6) vs 0 (0~3), P<0.05]. However, the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in Mckeown group was significantly higher than that in Ivor Lewis group [10.7% (62/581) vs 1.5%(2/135), P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in the 1 -, 3 -, 5-year overall survival between the Ivor Lewis group(91.0%, 70.5%, 52.9%) and the Mckeown group (89.7%, 68.4%, 62.4%, P>0.05), and there was also no significant difference in the 1 -, 3 -, 5-year disease free survival between the Ivor Lewis group(77.0%, 54.1%, 44.0%) and the Mckeown group (78.3%, 59.0%, 52.8%, P>0.05). Conclusions: Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and Mckeown esophagectomy are feasible, safe, good short-term efficacy and similar survival rate for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Ivor Lewis surgery has lower incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Mckeown operation has more advantages in lymph node dissection, especially in lymph node dissection beside the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华肿瘤杂志
中华肿瘤杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10433
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[Cancer incidence, mortality and trends among elderly in Hebei province, 2011-2020]. [Clinicopathological features of primary pulmonary epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a study of 7 cases]. [Comparison of clinical outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and Mckeown esophagectomy for middle or lower esophageal cancer]. [Epidemiological characteristics of cancer mortality in the elderly in Qidong, 1972-2021]. [Evolution of grading for solitary fibrous tumors of the central nervous system: a clinical pathological and prognostic analysis].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1