Associations between pathological personality traits, functional impairment, and personality disorder: Controlling for basic personality traits and identity disturbance.

IF 4.2 Personality disorders Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1037/per0000731
Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler
{"title":"Associations between pathological personality traits, functional impairment, and personality disorder: Controlling for basic personality traits and identity disturbance.","authors":"Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler","doi":"10.1037/per0000731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"504-515"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病理性人格特征、功能障碍和人格障碍之间的联系:基本人格特征和身份障碍的控制。
当代模型将人格障碍(PD)概念化为人格功能障碍和病态人格特征的结合。然而,一些观点认为病理特征以及功能障碍可能是PD的充分指标。本研究建立在先前研究的基础上,调查身份障碍(定义为自我意识上的连贯性、不一致性和不连续性受损)是否会导致超出基本五因素人格特征的病态人格特征得分。此外,它还研究了在控制身份障碍和基本人格特质时,病理人格特质域、PD诊断和功能障碍之间的联系是否仍然存在。该研究包括两个样本:776名社区个体(344名有精神病史)和77名诊断为PD的精神患者。具有潜在因素的结构方程模型表明,病态人格特征域可以被描述为基本人格特征变异和较小程度的身份障碍的组合。然而,当身份障碍得到控制时,病理特征域不再将PD患者与有精神病史的社区参与者区分开来。此外,除了基本人格特质和身份障碍的贡献外,个体病理特征域在预测功能障碍方面没有显示出增加的有效性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The network structure of personality functioning and maladaptive traits in adolescents. An evaluation and proposed modifications of personality disorder trait diagnostic sets in the alternative model of personality disorders. Psychoeducational interventions for borderline personality disorder: A scoping review. The most influential decision factors for choosing a formal diagnostic classification system for describing personality pathology. Measurement invariance of the Five-Factor Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory in a U.S. census-matched sample: Demographic differences in obsessive-compulsive personality disorder traits across age, gender, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1