Emission Factor Recommendation for Life Cycle Assessments with Generative AI

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL 环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c12667
Bharathan Balaji, Fahimeh Ebrahimi, Nina Gabrielle G Domingo, Venkata Sai Gargeya Vunnava, Abu-Zaher Faridee, Soma Ramalingam, Shikha Gupta, Anran Wang, Harsh Gupta, Domenic Belcastro, Kellen Axten, Jeremie Hakian, Jared Kramer, Aravind Srinivasan, Qingshi Tu
{"title":"Emission Factor Recommendation for Life Cycle Assessments with Generative AI","authors":"Bharathan Balaji, Fahimeh Ebrahimi, Nina Gabrielle G Domingo, Venkata Sai Gargeya Vunnava, Abu-Zaher Faridee, Soma Ramalingam, Shikha Gupta, Anran Wang, Harsh Gupta, Domenic Belcastro, Kellen Axten, Jeremie Hakian, Jared Kramer, Aravind Srinivasan, Qingshi Tu","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c12667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is crucial for organizations to measure and mitigate their environmental impact. Life cycle assessment (LCA) estimates the environmental impacts throughout a product’s entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life. Measuring the emissions outside a product owner’s control is challenging, and practitioners rely on emission factors (EFs)─estimations of GHG emissions per unit of activity─to model and estimate indirect impacts. However, the current practice of manually selecting appropriate EFs from databases is time-consuming and error-prone and requires expertise. We present an AI-assisted method leveraging natural language processing and machine learning to automatically recommend EFs with human-interpretable justifications. Our algorithm can assist experts by providing a ranked list of EFs or operating in a fully automated manner, where the top recommendation is selected as final. Benchmarks across multiple real-world data sets show our method recommends the correct EF with an average precision of 86.9% in the fully automated case and shows the correct EF in the top 10 recommendations with an average precision of 93.1%. By streamlining EF selection, our approach enables scalable and accurate quantification of GHG emissions, supporting organizations’ sustainability initiatives and progress toward net-zero emissions targets across industries.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c12667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is crucial for organizations to measure and mitigate their environmental impact. Life cycle assessment (LCA) estimates the environmental impacts throughout a product’s entire lifecycle, from raw material extraction to end-of-life. Measuring the emissions outside a product owner’s control is challenging, and practitioners rely on emission factors (EFs)─estimations of GHG emissions per unit of activity─to model and estimate indirect impacts. However, the current practice of manually selecting appropriate EFs from databases is time-consuming and error-prone and requires expertise. We present an AI-assisted method leveraging natural language processing and machine learning to automatically recommend EFs with human-interpretable justifications. Our algorithm can assist experts by providing a ranked list of EFs or operating in a fully automated manner, where the top recommendation is selected as final. Benchmarks across multiple real-world data sets show our method recommends the correct EF with an average precision of 86.9% in the fully automated case and shows the correct EF in the top 10 recommendations with an average precision of 93.1%. By streamlining EF selection, our approach enables scalable and accurate quantification of GHG emissions, supporting organizations’ sustainability initiatives and progress toward net-zero emissions targets across industries.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生成式人工智能的生命周期评估的排放因子推荐
准确量化温室气体(GHG)排放对于组织衡量和减轻其环境影响至关重要。生命周期评估(LCA)评估产品从原材料提取到生命周期结束的整个生命周期对环境的影响。测量产品所有者无法控制的排放具有挑战性,从业者依靠排放因子(EFs)──对每单位活动的温室气体排放量的估计──来模拟和估计间接影响。然而,目前从数据库中手动选择合适的EFs的做法既耗时又容易出错,而且需要专业知识。我们提出了一种人工智能辅助方法,利用自然语言处理和机器学习来自动推荐具有人类可解释理由的EFs。我们的算法可以通过提供EFs排名列表或以全自动方式操作来协助专家,其中最重要的推荐被选为最终推荐。跨多个真实世界数据集的基准测试表明,我们的方法在全自动情况下推荐正确的EF,平均精度为86.9%,在前10个推荐中显示正确的EF,平均精度为93.1%。通过简化EF选择,我们的方法可以实现可扩展和准确的温室气体排放量化,支持组织的可持续发展倡议和跨行业实现净零排放目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
期刊最新文献
Temporal Variations in the Association between Short-Term Exposure to PM2.5, Its Components, and Ischemic Stroke Onset: A Nationwide Case-Crossover Study of 1.62 Million Patients Unraveling an Unexpected Trade-Off: The NOx–N2O Evolution and Chemical Mechanism for Co-Combustion of Coal and Biomass Unveiling Halogenated and Nitrogenous DBPs in Chloramination-Ozonation Process: DFT-Driven Formation Pathways from Tyrosine and Toxicity Assessment. Influence of Carbon Dioxide and pH on Influenza Virus in Sessile Saliva Droplets. Colloidal Cd Mobilization during the Dissolution of Cd-Birnessite by Organic Matter: Role of Mineral Transformation and Organic Molecule Fractionation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1