Closing economical and sustainability gaps for China's wheat, maize, and rice production: A county level energy analysis approach.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125041
Xu Wang, Jie Yan, Thijs Victor Bierman, Xinzhe Dong, Yifei Wu, Wenxin Wang, Minghao Zhuang
{"title":"Closing economical and sustainability gaps for China's wheat, maize, and rice production: A county level energy analysis approach.","authors":"Xu Wang, Jie Yan, Thijs Victor Bierman, Xinzhe Dong, Yifei Wu, Wenxin Wang, Minghao Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China is facing simultaneous challenges in achieving food security, increasing smallholder farmer incomes, and reducing environmental pollution. Conducting spatially explicit analysis of the environmental sustainability and economic benefits of food production systems can assist policymakers in formulating context-specific strategies, yet previous studies have largely been conducted at national and provincial scales or have focused solely on one aspect of the environment or economy. Here, we use Emergy Analysis (EMA) and Energy Efficiency Cost (EEC) assessments to reveal notable spatial variations in the emergy sustainability index (ESI) and EEC for staple crop production at the county level in China, with ESI ranges for wheat, maize, and rice being 0.02-4.53, 0.04-3.57, and 0.05-3.40, and EEC ranges being 0.24-3.04, 0.09-4.38, and 0.12-4.38 CYN MJ<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Counties with high ESI and low EEC are mainly distributed in East, North, and Central China and benefit from higher grain yields and lower chemical inputs. In contrast, counties with low ESI and high EEC, located mainly in the Southwest, Northwest, and South regions, suffer from underutilization of natural resources, abuse of nitrogen fertilizer, and inefficient use of agricultural machinery. Closing these regional ESI and EEC gaps would benefit China as a whole and could likely be achieved the fastest by increasing grain yields and enhancing agricultural machinery efficiency, although improving nitrogen use efficiency (e.g., in Northeast, North, and Northwest China) could also make a notable contribution. In conclusion, our research provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between environmental and economic factors in China's staple crop production, thereby advancing sustainable food production. In addition, our study provides scientific support for policymakers to formulate optimal regional management strategies and offers guidance to farmers on more efficient production practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"380 ","pages":"125041"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is facing simultaneous challenges in achieving food security, increasing smallholder farmer incomes, and reducing environmental pollution. Conducting spatially explicit analysis of the environmental sustainability and economic benefits of food production systems can assist policymakers in formulating context-specific strategies, yet previous studies have largely been conducted at national and provincial scales or have focused solely on one aspect of the environment or economy. Here, we use Emergy Analysis (EMA) and Energy Efficiency Cost (EEC) assessments to reveal notable spatial variations in the emergy sustainability index (ESI) and EEC for staple crop production at the county level in China, with ESI ranges for wheat, maize, and rice being 0.02-4.53, 0.04-3.57, and 0.05-3.40, and EEC ranges being 0.24-3.04, 0.09-4.38, and 0.12-4.38 CYN MJ-1, respectively. Counties with high ESI and low EEC are mainly distributed in East, North, and Central China and benefit from higher grain yields and lower chemical inputs. In contrast, counties with low ESI and high EEC, located mainly in the Southwest, Northwest, and South regions, suffer from underutilization of natural resources, abuse of nitrogen fertilizer, and inefficient use of agricultural machinery. Closing these regional ESI and EEC gaps would benefit China as a whole and could likely be achieved the fastest by increasing grain yields and enhancing agricultural machinery efficiency, although improving nitrogen use efficiency (e.g., in Northeast, North, and Northwest China) could also make a notable contribution. In conclusion, our research provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between environmental and economic factors in China's staple crop production, thereby advancing sustainable food production. In addition, our study provides scientific support for policymakers to formulate optimal regional management strategies and offers guidance to farmers on more efficient production practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Enhancement of volatile fatty acids degradation and rapid methanogenesis in a biochar-assisted anaerobic membrane bioreactor via enhancing direct interspecies electron transfer. How do environmental and operational factors impact particulate matter dynamics in building construction? - Insights from real-time sensing. Can central bank green communication reduce carbon emissions of high-energy-consuming firms? Can sustainable policies drive TOD effectively? Insights from multi-scenario simulations. Local government behavior and green technology innovation under ecological goals incentives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1