Closing economical and sustainability gaps for China's wheat, maize, and rice production: A county level energy analysis approach.

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125041
Xu Wang, Jie Yan, Thijs Victor Bierman, Xinzhe Dong, Yifei Wu, Wenxin Wang, Minghao Zhuang
{"title":"Closing economical and sustainability gaps for China's wheat, maize, and rice production: A county level energy analysis approach.","authors":"Xu Wang, Jie Yan, Thijs Victor Bierman, Xinzhe Dong, Yifei Wu, Wenxin Wang, Minghao Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China is facing simultaneous challenges in achieving food security, increasing smallholder farmer incomes, and reducing environmental pollution. Conducting spatially explicit analysis of the environmental sustainability and economic benefits of food production systems can assist policymakers in formulating context-specific strategies, yet previous studies have largely been conducted at national and provincial scales or have focused solely on one aspect of the environment or economy. Here, we use Emergy Analysis (EMA) and Energy Efficiency Cost (EEC) assessments to reveal notable spatial variations in the emergy sustainability index (ESI) and EEC for staple crop production at the county level in China, with ESI ranges for wheat, maize, and rice being 0.02-4.53, 0.04-3.57, and 0.05-3.40, and EEC ranges being 0.24-3.04, 0.09-4.38, and 0.12-4.38 CYN MJ<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Counties with high ESI and low EEC are mainly distributed in East, North, and Central China and benefit from higher grain yields and lower chemical inputs. In contrast, counties with low ESI and high EEC, located mainly in the Southwest, Northwest, and South regions, suffer from underutilization of natural resources, abuse of nitrogen fertilizer, and inefficient use of agricultural machinery. Closing these regional ESI and EEC gaps would benefit China as a whole and could likely be achieved the fastest by increasing grain yields and enhancing agricultural machinery efficiency, although improving nitrogen use efficiency (e.g., in Northeast, North, and Northwest China) could also make a notable contribution. In conclusion, our research provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between environmental and economic factors in China's staple crop production, thereby advancing sustainable food production. In addition, our study provides scientific support for policymakers to formulate optimal regional management strategies and offers guidance to farmers on more efficient production practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"380 ","pages":"125041"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China is facing simultaneous challenges in achieving food security, increasing smallholder farmer incomes, and reducing environmental pollution. Conducting spatially explicit analysis of the environmental sustainability and economic benefits of food production systems can assist policymakers in formulating context-specific strategies, yet previous studies have largely been conducted at national and provincial scales or have focused solely on one aspect of the environment or economy. Here, we use Emergy Analysis (EMA) and Energy Efficiency Cost (EEC) assessments to reveal notable spatial variations in the emergy sustainability index (ESI) and EEC for staple crop production at the county level in China, with ESI ranges for wheat, maize, and rice being 0.02-4.53, 0.04-3.57, and 0.05-3.40, and EEC ranges being 0.24-3.04, 0.09-4.38, and 0.12-4.38 CYN MJ-1, respectively. Counties with high ESI and low EEC are mainly distributed in East, North, and Central China and benefit from higher grain yields and lower chemical inputs. In contrast, counties with low ESI and high EEC, located mainly in the Southwest, Northwest, and South regions, suffer from underutilization of natural resources, abuse of nitrogen fertilizer, and inefficient use of agricultural machinery. Closing these regional ESI and EEC gaps would benefit China as a whole and could likely be achieved the fastest by increasing grain yields and enhancing agricultural machinery efficiency, although improving nitrogen use efficiency (e.g., in Northeast, North, and Northwest China) could also make a notable contribution. In conclusion, our research provides a deeper understanding of the relationship between environmental and economic factors in China's staple crop production, thereby advancing sustainable food production. In addition, our study provides scientific support for policymakers to formulate optimal regional management strategies and offers guidance to farmers on more efficient production practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小中国小麦、玉米和水稻生产的经济和可持续性差距:一个县级能源分析方法。
中国在实现粮食安全、增加小农收入和减少环境污染方面同时面临挑战。对粮食生产系统的环境可持续性和经济效益进行明确的空间分析可以帮助决策者制定具体情况的战略,但以前的研究主要是在国家和省级尺度上进行的,或者只关注环境或经济的一个方面。通过能值分析(EMA)和能效成本(EEC)分析,揭示了中国县域主要作物生产的能值可持续性指数(ESI)和能效成本(EEC)存在显著的空间差异,小麦、玉米和水稻的能值可持续性指数(ESI)范围分别为0.02 ~ 4.53、0.04 ~ 3.57和0.05 ~ 3.40,EEC范围分别为0.24 ~ 3.04、0.09 ~ 4.38和0.12 ~ 4.38 CYN MJ-1。高ESI和低EEC的县主要分布在中国东部、北部和中部,受益于较高的粮食产量和较低的化学品投入。相比之下,低ESI和高EEC的县主要分布在西南、西北和南部地区,自然资源利用不足,氮肥滥用,农业机械使用效率低下。缩小这些区域ESI和EEC差距将使中国整体受益,通过提高粮食产量和提高农业机械效率可能最快实现,尽管提高氮利用效率(如东北、华北和西北地区)也可能做出显著贡献。综上所述,我们的研究有助于更深入地了解中国主要作物生产中环境和经济因素之间的关系,从而促进可持续粮食生产。此外,本研究为决策者制定最优区域管理策略提供了科学支持,并为农民提供了更有效的生产实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Impact of various microalgal-bacterial populations on municipal wastewater bioremediation and its energy feasibility for lipid-based biofuel production' [J. Environ. Manag., Volume 249 (2019), 109384]. A comparative assessment of human entrapment and instability risks in flash floods. Heat integrated stripper for amine-based CO2 capture: Pilot and simulation study with AMP/Pz solvent. Co-smouldering combustion of food waste and coal gasification slag: Synergistic effects on reaction characteristics and fuel gas properties. FinTech and the sustainable development goals: Global evidence from economic, environmental, and social dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1