Katya Remy, Matthew A DePamphilis, Martin R Buta, Kristyn A Vicente, Krishna Vyas, Dieter Manstein, Katherine H Carruthers
{"title":"Core Innovations in Skin Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review of Microcoring Technology.","authors":"Katya Remy, Matthew A DePamphilis, Martin R Buta, Kristyn A Vicente, Krishna Vyas, Dieter Manstein, Katherine H Carruthers","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microcoring is a novel, minimally invasive technology for skin rejuvenation that uses hollow needles to remove full-thickness skin cores.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the current evidence on the outcomes and safety of microcoring and identify areas for future research.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods/materials: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was conducted using the search strategy \"micro-coring' OR \"microcoring\" across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Risk of bias and quality assessment were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included: three preclinical in vivo porcine studies and five clinical studies involving 112 patients. The studies evaluated various microcoring designs, differing in needle size, depth, number, and treatment density. Current evidence indicates that microcoring improves skin quality through mechanisms involving tissue removal, skin tightening, and epidermal and dermal regeneration/remodeling. Clinically, microcoring has been most commonly investigated to treat facial rhytids, with emerging applications for enlarged facial pores and acne scars. Studies report mild pain and trace-to-moderate bleeding during the procedure, and trace-to-moderate postprocedure adverse skin effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microcoring demonstrates promising outcomes in improving skin quality and seems to be well-tolerated and safe. Studies with larger patient cohorts, longer follow-up, comprehensive histological analyses, and comparisons with other minimally invasive techniques are needed to confirm outcomes and refine strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"696-701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Microcoring is a novel, minimally invasive technology for skin rejuvenation that uses hollow needles to remove full-thickness skin cores.
Objective: To review the current evidence on the outcomes and safety of microcoring and identify areas for future research.
Patients and methods/materials: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was conducted using the search strategy "micro-coring' OR "microcoring" across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Risk of bias and quality assessment were conducted.
Results: Eight studies were included: three preclinical in vivo porcine studies and five clinical studies involving 112 patients. The studies evaluated various microcoring designs, differing in needle size, depth, number, and treatment density. Current evidence indicates that microcoring improves skin quality through mechanisms involving tissue removal, skin tightening, and epidermal and dermal regeneration/remodeling. Clinically, microcoring has been most commonly investigated to treat facial rhytids, with emerging applications for enlarged facial pores and acne scars. Studies report mild pain and trace-to-moderate bleeding during the procedure, and trace-to-moderate postprocedure adverse skin effects.
Conclusion: Microcoring demonstrates promising outcomes in improving skin quality and seems to be well-tolerated and safe. Studies with larger patient cohorts, longer follow-up, comprehensive histological analyses, and comparisons with other minimally invasive techniques are needed to confirm outcomes and refine strategies.
背景:微芯取芯是一种新颖的、微创的皮肤年轻化技术,它使用空心针去除全层皮肤芯。目的:回顾目前关于微取心效果和安全性的证据,并确定未来研究的领域。患者和方法/材料:在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane中使用“micro- core”或“microcore”搜索策略进行符合prisma标准的系统评价。进行偏倚风险和质量评价。结果:纳入8项研究:3项临床前体内猪研究和5项临床研究,涉及112例患者。这些研究评估了不同的微取心设计,不同的取心针尺寸、深度、数量和处理密度。目前的证据表明,微芯通过组织去除、皮肤紧致、表皮和真皮再生/重塑等机制改善皮肤质量。临床上,微孔取芯术最常用于治疗面部心律失常,也用于面部毛孔肿大和痤疮疤痕。研究报告了手术过程中轻度疼痛和轻度至中度出血,以及术后轻度至中度皮肤不良反应。结论:微芯穿刺在改善皮肤质量方面表现出良好的效果,并且似乎具有良好的耐受性和安全性。需要更大的患者队列、更长的随访、全面的组织学分析和与其他微创技术的比较来确认结果和改进策略。
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.