Symmetric and asymmetric dimethylarginines in healthy and colic horses

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105615
Francesca Bindi , Irene Nocera , Valentina Meucci , Giorgia Vallesi , Giulia Sala , Alessandro Spadari , Riccardo Rinnovati , Francesca Bonelli , Micaela Sgorbini
{"title":"Symmetric and asymmetric dimethylarginines in healthy and colic horses","authors":"Francesca Bindi ,&nbsp;Irene Nocera ,&nbsp;Valentina Meucci ,&nbsp;Giorgia Vallesi ,&nbsp;Giulia Sala ,&nbsp;Alessandro Spadari ,&nbsp;Riccardo Rinnovati ,&nbsp;Francesca Bonelli ,&nbsp;Micaela Sgorbini","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the plasma concentrations of symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in healthy horses and in horses affected by colic in relation to the type of colic and systemic inflammation response syndrome (SIRS) status. Upon admission (T0), horses underwent a physical examination, and the SIRS status was assessed. The horses with colic were divided retrospectively based on the type of colic, SIRS status, treatment, and outcome. SDMA and ADMA levels were measured at T0 and then every 24 h at four time points (T1, T2, T3, T4). Differences between groups (healthy, non-strangulating intestinal obstruction, strangulating intestinal obstruction, SIRS-positive, and SIRS-negative) were analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Changes within groups over time were assessed using Friedman's two-way analysis of variance by ranks. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to analyze SDMA and ADMA levels in colic horses. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, cut-off values, area under the curve analysis, and 95 % confidence intervals. SDMA concentrations were significantly lower in healthy horses compared to colic patients across all sampling times. ADMA levels were significantly higher at T2 in strangulating colic and SIRS-positive horses compared to healthy horses. GLMM analysis revealed no differences in SDMA or ADMA concentrations based on colic type, SIRS status, treatment, or outcome. Neither SDMA nor ADMA appeared to offer clinical utility as biomarkers in distinguishing between strangulating and non-strangulating colic or SIRS-positive and negative horses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 105615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003452882500089X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the plasma concentrations of symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) in healthy horses and in horses affected by colic in relation to the type of colic and systemic inflammation response syndrome (SIRS) status. Upon admission (T0), horses underwent a physical examination, and the SIRS status was assessed. The horses with colic were divided retrospectively based on the type of colic, SIRS status, treatment, and outcome. SDMA and ADMA levels were measured at T0 and then every 24 h at four time points (T1, T2, T3, T4). Differences between groups (healthy, non-strangulating intestinal obstruction, strangulating intestinal obstruction, SIRS-positive, and SIRS-negative) were analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Changes within groups over time were assessed using Friedman's two-way analysis of variance by ranks. Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) were used to analyze SDMA and ADMA levels in colic horses. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, cut-off values, area under the curve analysis, and 95 % confidence intervals. SDMA concentrations were significantly lower in healthy horses compared to colic patients across all sampling times. ADMA levels were significantly higher at T2 in strangulating colic and SIRS-positive horses compared to healthy horses. GLMM analysis revealed no differences in SDMA or ADMA concentrations based on colic type, SIRS status, treatment, or outcome. Neither SDMA nor ADMA appeared to offer clinical utility as biomarkers in distinguishing between strangulating and non-strangulating colic or SIRS-positive and negative horses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对称和不对称二甲基精氨酸在健康马和绞痛马中的含量。
本研究探讨了健康马和绞痛马血浆中对称二甲基精氨酸(SDMA)和不对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA)浓度与绞痛类型和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)状态的关系。入院后(T0),马接受身体检查,并评估SIRS状态。根据绞痛类型、SIRS状态、治疗和结果对绞痛马进行回顾性分类。分别于T0和T1、T2、T3、T4四个时间点每24 h测定SDMA和ADMA水平。用Kruskal-Wallis试验分析各组(健康、非绞窄性肠梗阻、绞窄性肠梗阻、sirs阳性和sirs阴性)之间的差异。组内随时间变化的评估使用弗里德曼的双向分析方差的行列。采用广义线性混合模型(glmm)分析绞痛马的SDMA和ADMA水平。采用受试者工作特征曲线、截止值、曲线下面积分析和95%置信区间评估诊断准确性。在所有采样时间内,健康马的SDMA浓度明显低于绞痛患者。与健康马相比,窒息绞痛和sirs阳性马在T2时的ADMA水平显著较高。GLMM分析显示,在绞痛类型、SIRS状态、治疗或结果的基础上,SDMA或ADMA浓度没有差异。无论是SDMA还是ADMA,似乎都不能作为区分勒死和非勒死绞痛或sirs阳性和阴性马的生物标志物提供临床效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of urinary amylase to creatinine ratio alone and in combination with urinary electrophoresis as a marker of renal damage in dogs with leishmaniosis undergoing conventional anti-Leishmania treatment Can integrated crop-livestock systems reduce tick infestation in cattle? Optimisation of an existing heifer matrix and its association with reproductive performance in nulliparous pasture-based dairy heifers Comprehensive analysis of gene expression profiles revealed increased expression of genes related to proteasome in feline nasal lymphoma Development of an ELISA as a complement to MAT for swine leptospirosis diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1