A Technology System to Help People With Multiple Disabilities Increase Contact With Objects and Control Environmental Stimulation: Single-Case Research Design.

Giulio E Lancioni, Gloria Alberti, Chiara Filippini, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Valeria Chiariello, Oriana Troccoli
{"title":"A Technology System to Help People With Multiple Disabilities Increase Contact With Objects and Control Environmental Stimulation: Single-Case Research Design.","authors":"Giulio E Lancioni, Gloria Alberti, Chiara Filippini, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O'Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Valeria Chiariello, Oriana Troccoli","doi":"10.2196/70378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with severe-to-profound intellectual disability and sensory-motor impairment tend to be passive and detached from their immediate context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed a new technology system using a webcam to detect participants' responses (ie, hand contact with objects) and to trigger computer delivery of preferred environmental stimulation, such as music, contingent on (immediately after) the occurrence of those responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 8 adults with severe to profound intellectual disability and extensive motor and visual impairments participated in the study. Each participant was exposed to an ABACB design. The technology system did not provide stimulation during the A (baseline) phases, provided stimulation contingent on the responses during the B (intervention) phases, and provided stimulation throughout the sessions during the C (control) phase. Sessions lasted 5 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the first baseline phase, the participants' mean frequency of responses per session was between about 3 and 6.5. During the first intervention phase, it increased to between about 10 and 18. It showed a clear decline during the second baseline phase, remained low during the control phase, and increased again during the second intervention phase. During this phase, it ranged from about 13 to 19.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The new technology system might be a useful tool to help people with intellectual and sensory-motor disabilities increase object contact and stimulation control.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"12 ","pages":"e70378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with severe-to-profound intellectual disability and sensory-motor impairment tend to be passive and detached from their immediate context.

Objective: This study assessed a new technology system using a webcam to detect participants' responses (ie, hand contact with objects) and to trigger computer delivery of preferred environmental stimulation, such as music, contingent on (immediately after) the occurrence of those responses.

Methods: In total, 8 adults with severe to profound intellectual disability and extensive motor and visual impairments participated in the study. Each participant was exposed to an ABACB design. The technology system did not provide stimulation during the A (baseline) phases, provided stimulation contingent on the responses during the B (intervention) phases, and provided stimulation throughout the sessions during the C (control) phase. Sessions lasted 5 minutes.

Results: During the first baseline phase, the participants' mean frequency of responses per session was between about 3 and 6.5. During the first intervention phase, it increased to between about 10 and 18. It showed a clear decline during the second baseline phase, remained low during the control phase, and increased again during the second intervention phase. During this phase, it ranged from about 13 to 19.5.

Conclusions: The new technology system might be a useful tool to help people with intellectual and sensory-motor disabilities increase object contact and stimulation control.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种帮助多重残疾人士增加与物体接触和控制环境刺激的技术系统:单案例研究设计。
背景:有严重到深度智力障碍和感觉运动障碍的人往往是被动的,脱离他们的直接环境。目的:本研究评估了一种新的技术系统,该系统使用网络摄像头来检测参与者的反应(即,手与物体的接触),并触发计算机根据这些反应的发生(立即)提供首选的环境刺激,如音乐。方法:共8例重度至重度智力障碍和广泛的运动和视觉障碍的成年人参与研究。每个参与者都接触到ABACB设计。该技术系统在A(基线)阶段不提供增产措施,在B(干预)阶段根据反应提供增产措施,在C(控制)阶段在整个过程中提供增产措施。每节课持续5分钟。结果:在第一个基线阶段,参与者每次会话的平均反应频率在3到6.5之间。在第一个干预阶段,它增加到大约10到18之间。在第二个基线阶段明显下降,在对照阶段保持较低水平,在第二个干预阶段再次上升。在这个阶段,它的范围在13到19.5之间。结论:新技术系统可能是一个有用的工具,帮助智力和感觉运动障碍的人增加物体接触和刺激控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using a Co-Designed Digital Self-Management Program to Prepare Patients for Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery: Pragmatic Pilot Study. Telephone Administration of the Human Activity Profile Questionnaire in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Methodological Study. AI-Based Gait Analysis System for Rehabilitation: Usability Evaluation of Human-Technology Interaction. Essential Requirements and Relevant Technologies for Load-Bearing 3D-Printed Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets and Their Components: State-of-the-Art Review. Telerehabilitation in Postoperative Breast Cancer Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1