EFFECT OF DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES ON VENTILATION DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation Pub Date : 2025-03-19 DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110584
N Segond, M Fischer, J Fontecave-Jallon, P Podsiadlo, K Lurie, A Bellier, G Debaty
{"title":"EFFECT OF DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES ON VENTILATION DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION.","authors":"N Segond, M Fischer, J Fontecave-Jallon, P Podsiadlo, K Lurie, A Bellier, G Debaty","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared face mask, supraglottic airway device (SGA), and endotracheal tube (ETT) ventilation with mechanical ventilation (MV) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the flat position and with head and thorax elevation (HTE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using thawed, fresh-frozen human cadavers this randomized cross-over study compared face mask, SGA, and ETT ventilation using an automated ventilator in the flat and HTE positions. Tidal volume (TV) was set to 8 mL/kg ideal predicted body weight, and expiratory TV (VTe) (mL/kg) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included inspiratory TV (VTi), maximal inspiratory airway pressure (Pmax), and leakage between inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes (VTi-VTe).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 8 cadavers and 2302 ventilation cycles were analyzed. In the flat position, VTe was 7.66 ± 3.75 with ETT, 5.01 ± 3.14 with SGA, and 5.63 ± 2.83 with face mask, respectively. A mixed linear model showed the airway device significantly impacted VTe, VTi, Pmax, and VTi-VTe (p<0.001 for each). Compared with intubation, both face mask and SGA ventilation resulted in lower VTe, lower Pmax, and higher VTi-VTe (p<0.001 for each). No significant differences were observed between face mask and SGA ventilation. There were higher VTe and lower VTi-VTe values (p<0.001 for each) with HTE versus the flat position (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In human cadavers undergoing CPR, mechanical ventilation through a face mask or SGA versus an ETT was associated with lower VTe, higher Pmax, and higher leakage values in human cadavers during CPR. Head and thorax elevation reduce face mask and SGA airway leakage during CPR and increase VTe.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110584"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110584","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared face mask, supraglottic airway device (SGA), and endotracheal tube (ETT) ventilation with mechanical ventilation (MV) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the flat position and with head and thorax elevation (HTE).

Methods: Using thawed, fresh-frozen human cadavers this randomized cross-over study compared face mask, SGA, and ETT ventilation using an automated ventilator in the flat and HTE positions. Tidal volume (TV) was set to 8 mL/kg ideal predicted body weight, and expiratory TV (VTe) (mL/kg) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included inspiratory TV (VTi), maximal inspiratory airway pressure (Pmax), and leakage between inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes (VTi-VTe).

Results: Data from 8 cadavers and 2302 ventilation cycles were analyzed. In the flat position, VTe was 7.66 ± 3.75 with ETT, 5.01 ± 3.14 with SGA, and 5.63 ± 2.83 with face mask, respectively. A mixed linear model showed the airway device significantly impacted VTe, VTi, Pmax, and VTi-VTe (p<0.001 for each). Compared with intubation, both face mask and SGA ventilation resulted in lower VTe, lower Pmax, and higher VTi-VTe (p<0.001 for each). No significant differences were observed between face mask and SGA ventilation. There were higher VTe and lower VTi-VTe values (p<0.001 for each) with HTE versus the flat position (p<0.001).

Conclusions: In human cadavers undergoing CPR, mechanical ventilation through a face mask or SGA versus an ETT was associated with lower VTe, higher Pmax, and higher leakage values in human cadavers during CPR. Head and thorax elevation reduce face mask and SGA airway leakage during CPR and increase VTe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
期刊最新文献
Eye movement detection using electrooculography and machine learning in cardiac arrest patients. From surviving to thriving: A call for comprehensive cardiac arrest survivor care EFFECT OF DIFFERENT AIRWAY DEVICES ON VENTILATION DURING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION. Population-based longitudinal cardiac arrest and resuscitation registry - the added value of NORCAR. What is the optimal prehospital blood pressure level after cardiac arrest? A retrospective cohort study on the association of blood pressure and mortality among patients treated with vasoactive medication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1